User talk:EraserGirl/Archive 3

Service badge
I noticed your edit summary re the service award EG; exactly my own thoughts when Snowman informed me that I was entitled to one, but in actual fact it just denotes that you have made a certain number of edits over a particular period of time so there is no need to feel it is gauche. Maybe it's my sick sense of humour (sorry, humor), but I had to laugh when I saw your mention of "Dorothy Hale – a fallen woman"! Do you know, there are so many times I've wanted to add a ridiculous comical little something to an article, such as:
 * "She later adopted 'Peg' (Entwistle) for the stage and held to that name for the remainder of her life. This was a natural choice of name since she had been born with a wooden leg."
 * "No longer able to maintain her high-society lifestyle and penchant for naked skydiving, Hale began to accept the largess of rich lovers and generous friends to supplement the meagre income from her part-time position in the drive-through booth at her local branch of McDonald's.

Feel free to delete the above EG. --Red Su ns et    20:36, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Well I had "a red spot on the pavement" but I decided it was impolitic and thought Fallen Woman more descriptive. The more I examine her life, the more appropriate I think it is.EraserGirl (talk) 21:00, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
 * "Entwistle? Isn't it Entwhistle? With an H? :-) Dekkappai (talk) 20:51, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Don't even GO there. EraserGirl (talk) 21:00, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Request
Hi, EraserGirl. If you have time, would you want to take a look at Kim Ki-young for editorial improvements? It's an article on a prominent Korean film director which I helped up to GA a while ago, and would like to put through FA eventually. Thanks! Dekkappai (talk) 22:47, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks, EG. The sentence you've marked as unclear means that Kim's full, complete, recognizable style first became apparent in the film The Housemaid. The title character of the film is a femme fatale-- a character type which Kim would feature in most of his mature work, and Korean critics (and international critics also, since Kim's discovery by the international community in 1997) consider one of the best Korean films ever made. I guess it's a lot packed into one sentence. Thanks for the copy-edit! Dekkappai (talk) 01:26, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Sorry, I got caught up in LIFE stuff and didn't get back right away. I think what bothers me about the sentence is that the 'STYLE' is slightly anthropomorphised. The STYLE performs the action, instead of the subject performing the action. I feel awkward about rewriting sentences on an article already accepted as good. I'm afraid to break something. EraserGirl (talk) 02:06, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
 * OK-- I see your point-- the style expresses itself. Feel free to work on it, or I'll rewrite it next week. I'm just online for a few minutes this weekend. Cheers! Dekkappai (talk) 02:08, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
 * You may also want to add a citation to it as it sounds overly subjective. I mean is IS an opinion. EraserGirl (talk) 02:50, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
 * OK-- I reworded it a little. I'll try to source the "first expression of mature style" thing-- I read this assertion so often while researching him, I guess I forgot that it is an opinion which needs sourcing. :-) Thanks again. Dekkappai (talk) 00:04, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry I am dogging it, I haven't had more than a few minutes at a time to do WP and editing takes concentration. I will attend. EraserGirl (talk) 00:53, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
 * No problem-- this isn't a "fine-toothed comb" request, just a once-over for any awkward prose before I put it through the next step in FA. Dekkappai (talk) 15:50, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
 * I've had to take time out to deal with that "Life" thing now & then too. Then I get back to the important stuff! Dekkappai (talk) 02:38, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Thanks
I have to say that editing the Anna May Wong article was a prime example of collaborative work with some very talented writers, but I am grateful for the fortune cookie. FWiW Bzuk (talk) 02:03, 3 May 2008 (UTC).
 * I guess I am fortunate enough to see it work. I would have not thought it possible. It seems the primary ingredient is civility - everything else can be compensated for. EraserGirl (talk) 02:42, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
 * There goes my diet! Thanks EG, but my role was a minor one – jumping in from the wings and interfering occasionally. The honours (there I go again) honors really belong to those who spent significant amounts of time and effort researching and then adding material to the article, you being one of them! As Bill says, it was a team effort and the outcome was the result of collaboration between talented editors, each having their own strengths while recognising those of others. --Red Su ns et    07:50, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Your talk page
You may well know this but I thought I'd drop in and let you know just in case. You link to Category:Women screenwriters can we written in wiki syntax as such Women screenwriters producing Women screenwriters. You external link works just as well and hope this helps. §hep  •   ¡Talk to me!  23:21, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
 * I think people expect wikilinks in text to go to articles. The category link should be at the bottom of the page and people will look for it there. What the context of this link? Snowman (talk) 21:29, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Guys can we just leave it alone? its just a link to my category of choice on my userpage. EraserGirl (talk) 22:08, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
 * The link is out of place, It is a bit like seeing an exhaust pipe emerging from the pavement (or sidewalk). Snowman (talk) 22:34, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Don't look. EraserGirl (talk) 23:27, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

June Mathis
Nice pic EG, good composition and you did a great job of cleaning it up. To top it all, it's a public domain image so there should be no probs with over-zealous editors wanting to remove it. --Red Su ns et    19:11, 6 May 2008 (UTC) Thanks. There's this lovely script that works with Photoshop and other programs. Works great for reclaiming images from old newspapers and magazines. EraserGirl (talk) 01:02, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Going "Dotty"
If you're on a roll keep going, especially if it's worthwhile material that you're adding or making other improvements. "Impecuniousness" eh, that'll get a few dictionaries dusted off EG! I'll wait for you to take a break before sticking my nose in. --Red Su ns et    20:11, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Films May 2008 Newsletter
The May 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:55, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Films June 2008 Newsletter
The June 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 23:51, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Chanduthemagician1932 titlecard.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Chanduthemagician1932 titlecard.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:43, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Films July 2008 Newsletter
The July 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:09, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Films roll call and coordinator elections
Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 04:01, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Films August 2008 Newsletter
The August 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:53, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Claraberanger.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Claraberanger.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:00, 18 September 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Thirdship (talk) 01:00, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

Suzan-Lori Parks screenplays
Why did you remove Girl 6 from the Suzan-Lori Parks category back in March? There wasn't any explanation on the talk page. DionysosProteus (talk) 12:41, 10 November 2008 (UTC)'
 * I barely remember, someone had confused categories with lists. So a film by a director would be on a list of that director's films; there would be no 'category' of films by that director, especially someone so unimportant. I don't remember anything other than that, we were cleaning up the film category labels. EraserGirl (talk) 16:49, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

WP:FILMS Questionnaire
As a member of WikiProject Films, you are invited to take part in the project's first questionnaire. It is intended to gauge your participation and views on the project. At the conclusion of the questionnaire, the project's coordinators will use the gathered feedback to find new ways to improve the project and reach out to potential members. The results of the questionnaire will be published in next month's newsletter. If you know of any editors who have edited film articles in the past, please invite them to take part in the questionnaire. Please stop by and take a few minutes to answer the questions so that we can continue to improve our project. Happy editing! This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:27, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

Help needed: Sitakunda Upazila
The article failed an FAC mostly because of irregularities in citation format. I found you at the ciitation cleanup project, and I am really hoping that you can help the article. Would you consider helping it, please? Aditya (talk • contribs) 12:43, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Elaine May.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Elaine May.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the media description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Angr 14:28, 5 March 2009 (UTC)