User talk:Erc

Hello and welcome to my talk page. Feel free to leave me a message.

SWAT article
I didn't make up that lead on my own. Discussion and compromise went into it. Reverting back to a consensus version isn't "ownership". Is there some reason you choose to ignore the previous work and refuse to discuss proposed changes? Niteshift36 (talk) 03:04, 20 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Looking at my talk page, I am absolutely astounded that I've had this same discussion with you eight years ago. And I still have the same problems with your editing of the SWAT article that I had with you then. I will prepare a response in the talk section later, as I have to organize my thoughts. erc talk/contribs 03:08, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Actually, it's not the same discussion at all. As I said, those aren't MY edits, they are a collaboration. For you to sweep in and ignore them without even the courtesy is participating in the discussion is a little disrespectful. I ask again, why do you feel you should refuse to join the discussion? Niteshift36 (talk) 03:15, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:17, 30 November 2015 (UTC)