User talk:Erdelyiek

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia.

I write this message to you to let you know that I find your attitude very disturbing. First of all, you should check Wikipedia's policy regarding Neutral Point Of Vue for the articles. You have made lots of edits on a problematic issue and all your edits were POV. Also, it is advisable to behave in a civil manner and to refrain from making insults on the Wikipedia pages. If not, you will be considered either a vandal or you can be banned for a period of time or indefinetley from editing on Wikipedia.

Thank you, and I hope you'll take into consideration my advices. Mihai -talk 23:31, 18 January 2006 (UTC) -- Please tell me who you are, and where can I object against your decisions, if I think so?

All my edits were made in the spirit of respect for truth, so I do not accept your threats and intimidation. Regards, Erdelyiek 00:12, 19 January 2006 (UTC)

The medieval Székely society
Could you please have a look at the new paragraph I wrote in Székelyföld. If there are no objections I will translate it into English, too. --KIDB 08:44, 23 January 2006 (UTC)

Hungarian minority in Romania
Hi! I saw some of your recent edits that have been removed as uncited and possibly POV. I think they were quite valuable so please try and find sources and cite them so they can safely remain in the article.--Tamas 11:56, 29 January 2006 (UTC)

The more precise the citation the better: if you can provide page numbers etc., do provide them.--Tamas 15:47, 29 January 2006 (UTC)

Bukovina
Why don't you believe that Bukovina had 86.000 people? And why do people call you an irridentist?Constantzeanu 22:57, 29 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Yeah but this is exactly the years in which the population all over Europe grew 10 fold if not 15 fold. Don't forget that Ukrainians, Germans and Poles were being brought into the province so it should not come to any surprise to you that the population grew by so much.Constantzeanu 23:05, 29 January 2006 (UTC)

Whom to quote
Hi! I don't think it is a good idea to quote Raffay here. Even if his figures etc. are correct, he won't be trusted because he is known for his far-right political views. You should quote mainstream historians who are reliable and widely respected: e.g. Ignac Romsics, to name just one. His has many good and well-researched books on 20th century Hungarian history, many of them have even been translated into English: e.g. Magyarország története a huszadik században [A History of Hungary in the 20st century], A trianoni békeszerződés [The Peace Treaty of Trianon]. These have many of the data you might need and they are perfectly respectable, non-nationalist, trustworthy, academic books on history. --Tamas 22:35, 30 January 2006 (UTC)

Isten hozta!
Jó napot kívánok, I noticed you never received a full welcome, so here's one - better late than never:

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Wikipedia Boot Camp, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Here are a few more good links to help you get started:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!

Latinus 18:56, 31 January 2006 (UTC)

Transylvania
Hi, about Transylvania, edits like this aren't the way to go. What is it exactly that you want to change about the article? --Latinus (talk (el:)) 13:06, 5 February 2006 (UTC)

Picture
The Vienna Awards picture should correctly say "Czecho-Slovakia" (not Slovakia). Juro 05:18, 7 February 2006 (UTC)

And you should probably tag it with PD-self; also, could you please answer my question at Image talk:ViennaAwards.GIF? Thanks. - Jmabel | Talk 21:14, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

Transylvania
Hello

Could you explain this edit??? I've just made a rolback, and blocked an annon user and when I looked at the article I saw that you made the same edit as him. Shoul I try and suspect you of being the anon user?

Thx Mihai -talk 17:23, 8 February 2006 (UTC)


 * OK, I thaught it was that. I've protected the page and spread some blocks. Mihai -talk 17:30, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

Image:ViennaAwards.GIF
Please provide proper source and tag for Image:ViennaAwards.GIF, otherwise it may be deleted soon. `'mikka (t) 00:25, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * If it's your original work, or came from a public domain source, please say so on the image page, it's up for deletion right now.- Jmabel | Talk 07:06, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

File source problem with File:IILajos.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:IILajos.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 22:07, 3 January 2011 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 22:07, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference
Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to  in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being 'minor'. The only thing that's changed is that you will no longer have them marked as minor by default.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you are familiar with the contents of WP:MINOR, and believe that it is still beneficial to the encyclopedia to have all your edits marked as such by default, then this discussion will give you the details you need to continue with this functionality indefinitely. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 20:15, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 23 November 2015 (UTC)