User talk:Ergo Sum/Archive 2

Review
Tony can be tough, but in my experience is almost always right on specifics, and I think the changes he's suggested have greatly helped the page. Hang on in there - the higher the bar the more rewarding the outcome. Ceoil (talk) 08:35, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
 * You're right about that. I feel my ability to anticipate the criticisms he identifies running thin, seeing as I wrote most of the prose and would not have if I thought it were unclear at the outset. That being said, I'm going to try to set aside my own bias and give the article a look through fresh eyes.  Ergo Sum  15:30, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Even though you are going through the riggrs with this, your writing is obviously highly polished and substantially above par. I think ye are coming close to agreement now, and we may be down to mere matters of style. One thing thats easy to forget; a single oppose doesn't sink a candidacy, and its ok to disagree and let some matters unresolved; happens all the time, just answer to a point, and then leave a case, and let the review continue. The delegates are very experienced. Ceoil (talk) 15:36, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Got it. Thanks.  Ergo Sum  15:47, 29 September 2018 (UTC)

Our Lady of Pompeii Church (Manhattan)
Hello:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Our Lady of Pompeii Church (Manhattan) has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Best of luck with the GA review.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 18:32, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Thank you.  Ergo Sum  20:56, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

DYK for Our Lady of Pompeii Church (Manhattan)
Alex Shih (talk) 00:02, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Our Lady of Pompeii Church (Manhattan)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Our Lady of Pompeii Church (Manhattan) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Vami IV -- Vami IV (talk) 01:21, 6 October 2018 (UTC)

DYK for Pietro Bandini
Alex Shih (talk) 00:03, 10 October 2018 (UTC)

Page mover granted
Hello, Ergo Sum. Your account has been [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=rights&user=&page=User%3AErgo_Sum granted] the "extendedmover" user right, either following a request for it or demonstrating familiarity with working with article names and moving pages. You are now able to rename pages without leaving behind a redirect, and move subpages when moving the parent page(s).

Please take a moment to review Page mover for more information on this user right, especially the criteria for moving pages without leaving redirect. Please remember to follow post-move cleanup procedures and make link corrections where necessary, including broken double-redirects when  is used. This can be done using Special:WhatLinksHere. It is also very important that no one else be allowed to access your account, so you should consider taking a few moments to secure your password. As with all user rights, be aware that if abused, or used in controversial ways without consensus, your page mover status can be revoked.

Useful links:
 * Requested moves
 * Category:Articles to be moved, for article renaming requests awaiting action.

If you do not want the page mover right anymore, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Thank you, and happy editing! Primefac (talk) 14:00, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

DYK for Adam Marshall (priest)
Alex Shih (talk) 00:01, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

Georgetown
Nice to see someone keeping Georgetown-adjacent articles up to snuff. Are you an alum as well?  ceran  thor 16:07, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
 * I am, and much of my editing is about Georgetown-related articles. Always good to meet another alumnus on Wikipedia. A while back, I toyed with the idea of creating a WikiProject Georgetown University. I've recently been considering it again, if for no other reason than to keep track of the Georgetown-related content and to keep a running list of editors who are open to contributing. I know Patrickneil does a bit of work in this area. I'm curious what you think of the idea.  Ergo Sum  17:43, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
 * I support it. Though I'm not sure I would be a very active help in the project (little interest in writing Jesuit history/education articles, unless they're related to science or pop culture), I did found a WikiProject years and years ago, so I could try to help out if you want any insight.  ceran  thor 18:34, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Would you be interested in improving articles that specifically cover the university?  Ergo Sum  19:07, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Possibly, though I can't think of any off the top of my head.  ceran  thor 19:43, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Okay.  Ergo Sum  20:38, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

If both or either of you are interested, I've proposed the wikiproject here.  Ergo Sum  22:31, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
 * I added my support! But I'd say we already have WP:UNI for standardization, and I'd want to fall back on their policies on when there's an argument about something like the infobox, or which rankings to include. Either way, I support more involvement!-- Patrick, o Ѻ ∞ 19:08, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
 * I agree. Thanks for the support. Do you know of any other editors who have been contributors to Georgetown articles?  Ergo Sum  21:33, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
 * You might touch base with, they've done a ton of work improving Georgetown basketball articles.-- Patrick, o Ѻ ∞ 16:08, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

DYK nomination of St. Peter's Pro-Cathedral
Hello! Your submission of St. Peter's Pro-Cathedral at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! SL93 (talk) 17:40, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

Editing News #2—2018
Read this in another language •  Subscription list for this multilingual newsletter  •  Subscription list on the English Wikipedia

Did you know?

Did you know that you can use the visual editor on a mobile device?

Tap on the pencil icon to start editing. The page will probably open in the wikitext editor.

You will see another pencil icon in the toolbar. Tap on that pencil icon to the switch between visual editing and wikitext editing.



Remember to publish your changes when you're done.

You can read and help translate the user guide, which has more information about how to use the visual editor.

Since the last newsletter, the Editing Team has wrapped up most of their work on the 2017 wikitext editor and the visual diff tool. The team has begun investigating the needs of editors who use mobile devices. Their work board is available in Phabricator. Their current priorities are fixing bugs and improving mobile editing.

Recent changes

 * The Editing team has published an initial report about mobile editing.
 * The Editing team has begun a design study of visual editing on the mobile website. New editors have trouble doing basic tasks on a smartphone, such as adding links to Wikipedia articles.  You can read the report.
 * The Reading team is working on a separate mobile-based contributions project.
 * The 2006 wikitext editor is no longer supported. If you used that toolbar, then you will no longer see any toolbar.  You may choose another editing tool in your editing preferences, local gadgets, or beta features.
 * The Editing team described the history and status of VisualEditor in this recorded public presentation (starting at 29 minutes, 30 seconds).
 * The Language team released a new version of Content Translation (CX2) last month, on International Translation Day. It integrates the visual editor to support templates, tables, and images.  It also produces better wikitext when the translated article is published.

Let's work together

 * The Editing team wants to improve visual editing on the mobile website.  Please read their ideas and tell the team what you think would help editors who use the mobile site.
 * The Community Wishlist Survey begins next week.
 * If you aren't reading this in your preferred language, then please help us with translations! Subscribe to the Translators mailing list or contact us directly.  We will notify you when the next issue is ready for translation.

— Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 17:11, 1 November 2018 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Jesuit Community Cemetery (Georgetown University)
Hello! Your submission of Jesuit Community Cemetery (Georgetown University) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 00:17, 2 November 2018 (UTC)

Our Lady of Pompeii Church (Manhattan)
Well done! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 03:12, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Thank you!  Ergo Sum  05:07, 3 November 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Our Lady of Pompeii Church (Manhattan)
The article Our Lady of Pompeii Church (Manhattan) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Our Lady of Pompeii Church (Manhattan) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Vami IV -- Vami IV (talk) 03:21, 3 November 2018 (UTC)

Canvassing at Trump
Hello. In this edit you selected two editors to summon because their earlier positions on the issue agreed with your current position. As I understand it, that's a vio of WP:CANVASS, which can result in a sanction. Please don't do it again. Acceptable ways to increase participation there would have been to (1) ping everybody who participated in the earlier discussion, or (2) start an RfC. &#8213; Mandruss  &#9742;  07:51, 5 November 2018 (UTC) I chose not to make a big issue of the canvassing. Your denial that it was canvassing is of more concern to me. &#8213; Mandruss  &#9742;  15:44, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
 * I didn't select them because they agreed with my position. I selected them because they were the only ones who mentioned Queens in their responses. The discussion I raised did not have to do with including 'United States' or 'New York State' in the infobox, but specifically Queens vs. New York City. That's not canvassing.  Ergo Sum  14:55, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
 * You appear to be reasoning that those who didn't !vote for Queens didn't have an opinion on Queens, which is clearly wrong. We can assume they considered Queens because it was in the list of options that was posted just before start of !voting, and they decided against it.

DYK for Georgetown Car Barn
Alex Shih (talk) 00:02, 15 November 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Bishop John Carroll (statue)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Bishop John Carroll (statue) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 21:21, 16 November 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Georgetown Car Barn
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Georgetown Car Barn you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 21:01, 18 November 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Georgetown Car Barn
The article Georgetown Car Barn you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Georgetown Car Barn for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 21:41, 18 November 2018 (UTC)

DYK for St. Peter's Pro-Cathedral
Alex Shih (talk) 00:03, 20 November 2018 (UTC)

DYK for Jesuit Community Cemetery
— Maile (talk) 00:01, 27 November 2018 (UTC)

Bishop John Carroll (statue)
Hello:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Bishop John Carroll (statue) has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 20:10, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Thank you.  Ergo Sum  00:02, 7 December 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Bishop John Carroll (statue)
The article Bishop John Carroll (statue) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Bishop John Carroll (statue) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 20:21, 17 November 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Bishop John Carroll (statue)
The article Bishop John Carroll (statue) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Bishop John Carroll (statue) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 13:21, 18 November 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Georgetown Car Barn
The article Georgetown Car Barn you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Georgetown Car Barn for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 22:02, 21 November 2018 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Bernard A. Maguire
Hello! Your submission of Bernard A. Maguire at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 04:04, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

DYK for Bishop John Carroll (statue)
Gatoclass (talk) 00:01, 14 December 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Tom MacDonald (rapper)


The article Tom MacDonald (rapper) has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. HC7 (talk) 02:53, 16 December 2018 (UTC)

DYK for Stephen L. Dubuisson
Gatoclass (talk) 00:02, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

School of Foreign Service
FYI, I tried very hard to find a replacement source referring to SFS as "the West Point of..." but was unable to; the only sources available link back to the wikipedia page.--Sargentpeale (talk) 22:02, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
 * I have not yet had a chance to look at the content with the broken link. I will see if archives of it are available. You may very well be right that no such recovery is possible.  Ergo Sum  00:38, 28 December 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Tom MacDonald (rapper)


A tag has been placed on Tom MacDonald (rapper) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the.  SITH   (talk)   20:22, 30 December 2018 (UTC)

DYK for Alphonsus J. Donlon
— Maile (talk) 00:01, 1 January 2019 (UTC)

DYK nomination of James A. Doonan
Hello! Your submission of James A. Doonan at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Kim Post (talk) 15:19, 3 January 2019 (UTC)

Potential collab
Would you be interested in working on John J. DeGioia at some point later this year? Or maybe another Georgetown-related article?  ceran  thor 22:45, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
 * I have a big backlog of Georgetown-related articles that I'm working my way through. For example, I intend to create an article for each president and, ideally promote it to FA (ambitious, I know). I've compiled a weighty trove of sources for almost all of the presidents and am now just working my way through it. My main constraint is real-life commitments. I also have a number of Georgetown articles pending at GAN, which have been there for a few months (if you happen to be interested in reviewing some, that would be fantastic). Since DeGioia will fall outside my corpus of sources that I've collected, I don't know if I'd be a huge help at the moment, but if you want to take the lead, I can certainly do some support work.  Ergo Sum  00:34, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
 * An idea, I've been meaning to get around to promoting Healy Hall to FA. Is that something you'd be interested in working on?  Ergo Sum  00:35, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Potentially. I'll let you know - when it comes to non-scientific articles, I tend to prefer writing biographies, but that could be an interesting challenge.  ceran  thor 00:48, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Making a note of it on my todo list on my userpage. Definitely give me a heads up when you're planning to tackle Healy Hall or have some time to start that project.  ceran  thor 15:56, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Sounds good. I probably won't be able to give it a good look for another month or so.  Ergo Sum  20:07, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
 * I just undertook an improvement of the DeGioia article, and remembered you asking me about collaborating. I've nominated it for GAN now. Would you be interesting in giving it a look to seee if there's anything you would like to add, or potentially doing a GAN review?  Ergo Sum  05:04, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Bernard A. Maguire
Alex Shih (talk) 00:02, 4 January 2019 (UTC)

Editor of the Week
User:MX submitted the following nomination for Editor of the Week:
 * I nominate Ergo Sum to be Editor of the Week for his outstanding contributions to WikiProject Catholicism, National Register of Historic Places WikiProject, and WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases. In less than four years, this editor has promoted 5 articles to GA, 2 to FA, and has received 2 Four Awards. Ergo Sum has over 25 contributions at DYK, and this is where this editor caught my attention. The first article Ergo Sum created that I read was Angelo De Donatis, which appeared at DYK. This is when I became a fan of his work and began reading more of his articles. My favorite article Ergo Sum wrote is William Matthews, which achieved the following milestones: Did You Know, On This Day, Good Article, and now Featured status. He works in an underrepresented area of Wikipedia and has great attention to detail. We haven't worked together before, but I hope I cross paths with him in the near future. I'd definitely learn a lot from him.

You can copy the following text to your user page to display a user box proclaiming your selection as Editor of the Week: Thanks again for your efforts! &#8213; Buster7  &#9742;   13:55, 11 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Thank you! That's very nice and unexpected of you to nominate me.  Ergo Sum  14:22, 11 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Don't mention it! This is well deserved. I hope you have a great weekend. Congrats again! MX ( ✉  •  ✎  ) 19:52, 11 May 2019 (UTC)

File:Archbishop Stepinac High School seal.jpg
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:10, 9 January 2019 (UTC)

DYK for James A. Ryder
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:01, 10 January 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of James A. Doonan
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article James A. Doonan you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ImmortalWizard -- ImmortalWizard (talk) 19:41, 10 January 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Thomas F. Mulledy
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:01, 11 January 2019 (UTC)

GAR feedback
Congratulations on writing a good article, hard work paid off! This is optional, but I would very much appreciate if you could leave your GAR feedback for my GAR on my talk page. AS long as it's constructive, you could talk about what you liked/disliked about my style, my well being, its effectiveness etc. Thanks again and keep up the good work!  Immortal  Wizard  (chat) 20:27, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

DYK for James A. Doonan
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of James A. Doonan
The article James A. Doonan you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:James A. Doonan for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ImmortalWizard -- ImmortalWizard (talk) 19:41, 12 January 2019 (UTC)

Navboxes
Franchise navboxes do not include things like filming locations or similar.★Trekker (talk) 06:48, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of James A. Doonan
The article James A. Doonan you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:James A. Doonan for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ImmortalWizard -- ImmortalWizard (talk) 20:21, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Joseph A. Sellinger
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 19:28, 17 February 2019 (UTC)

Georgetown Car Barn TFA
Hi, this is to let you know that the above article will appear as Today's Featured Article on March 31, 2019. The blurb to be used can be found here. You are free to edit the blurb, and may want to watchlist that page, as well as WP:ERRORS in case there are queries about it on the day it runs, as well as the previous day. If you have questions or concerns, feel free to post on my talk. Thanks for building quality content! (same advice applies to the priest!)--Wehwalt (talk) 19:33, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Great! I will take a look at it momentarily.  Ergo Sum  23:10, 17 February 2019 (UTC)

DYK for St. John the Evangelist Catholic Church (Frederick, Maryland)
— Maile (talk) 12:02, 25 February 2019 (UTC)

DYK for William McSherry
— Maile (talk) 12:01, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

DYK nomination of John W. Beschter
Hello! Your submission of John W. Beschter at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 22:48, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

"Luxemborg" in John W. Beschter
Hi there, Ergo Sum. I don't think I have had the pleasure of communicating with you before. With a user name like yours, I would certainly have remembered. Thank you for your interesting article on Beschter. You have obviously spent a lot of time and effort researching it. I was a little surprised to see that you had changed the spelling of Luxembourg back to Luxemborg, especially as you had maintained the correct spelling of Luxembourg in all your edits until 11 March when you removed the "u" to "standardize spelling". I think perhaps you intended to remove the "o" to bring the spelling in line with you source where it is indeed spelled "Luxemburg". Luxemburg is in fact the German spelling and has been used as an alternate in English but today the accepted spelling is Luxembourg. Your "Luxemborg" is sometimes used in Danish and other Scandinavian languages but never in English. I would therefore suggest that you now correct the spelling back to Luxembourg. (By the way, when you changed the spelling to Luxemborg, you said it was for consistency throughout the article but as far as I can see, this is the only occurance.) Perhaps I should also ping who checked for typos. I look forward to seeing the article on DYK shortly and hope it soon makes the grade to GA.--Ipigott (talk) 14:44, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
 * John W. Beschter currently does not error by WP:AWB/T (AWB typo checks; it does not detect so not check for 'Luxemburg'). Glancing at article Luxembourg, it seems that -burg is German only and so not English. Maybe there are WP:ENGVAR ties. I only can do automated typo checks, so here ends my contribution. -DePiep (talk) 14:53, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your message. I had in mind the "ou"/"u" distinction, and was trying to keep it consistent with the Duchy of Luxemburg spelling. I now notice that I had misspelled the word altogether as Luxemborg in the instance in question. I also didn't realize that the conventional English spelling is with the "ou." I'll go ahead and correct the spelling accordingly. Thanks for pointing this out.  Ergo Sum  15:07, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
 * I thought that must have been your intention. Thanks for changing it back, together with Duchy of Luxembourg. While I'm here, I should perhaps also inform you that there is no such person as a Luxembourgian (mentioned in your DYK discussion). The correct term is a Luxembourger, rhyming with Hamburger. When we need a qualifier for a person from Luxembourg, we simply use Luxembourg. (In the same way as you would say a New Zealand politician, we would say a Luxembourg politician.) As far as I can see, Luxembourgian as a qualifier is a Wikipedia (Wikipedian??) invention although it is occasionally used as a synonym for the language Luxembourgish. For that reason, I changed the DYK hook. It must be difficult for an American to become familiar with all these European idiosyncrasies.--Ipigott (talk) 16:11, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Okay, good to know. The states of the former HRE are by no means my speciality, so guidance from others is always appreciated.  Ergo Sum  20:09, 27 March 2019 (UTC)

On a separate note, I have a question and you might be the person who knows the answer. While most sources say that Beschter was born in Luxembourg, I have one reliable source that says he was born in "Limbourg, Luxemburg." I'm not sure how to reconcile this, because what research I have done has told me that Limbourg was never part of the Duchy of Luxembourg. So, I'm wondering if "Luxemburg" does not refer to the duchy, but to some other entity with duchy, county or some other status. Frankly, without undertaking a thorough history of the region, I'm not sure what to make of this claim.  Ergo Sum  20:51, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
 * I can understand the confusion. At the time of Beschter's birth, both Limburg and Luxembourg formed parts of the Austrian Netherlands. In 1763, Limburg bordered on Luxembourg. If Beschter came from the north of Luxembourg or the south of Limburg, it might not be clear if he was born a Limburger or a Luxembourger. In either case, he would probably have been simply an Austrian. This article shows the geographical boundaries at the time. I would guess, by the way, that the original spelling of his name was Bechter which is a common name in Austria and Germany. It was probably changed to Beschter on his arrival in America.--Ipigott (talk) 08:32, 28 March 2019 (UTC)

Wait, what century is _this_?
It is my unfortunate fate that the long overlooked just pops out and pokes me in the eye. I never know why other people don't notice.

In the second paragraph of William_Matthews_(priest) it says
 * ... enabling the construction of a larger school on G Street in 1857. The school endured into the nineteenth century, ...

introduced by this edit Feb 2018

Now I did check carefully (WP!) that the current century is the 21st, and the 19th century covered all the 1800's but one. Further I peeked at Google which showed me a LoCongress picture of the place from 1901. So I'm'a thinking you meant "into the twentieth century"?

Hey, it shows I read all the way to the end. Must be a good article! :-) Shenme (talk) 04:56, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
 * I'm not quite sure what you mean by your reference to the 21st century, but in my view, to say it endured into the 20th century, when it closed down in 1901 is a bit misleading. I've rephrased the sentence to read "through the nineteenth century," which I suspect you would agree is clearer.  Ergo Sum  05:32, 28 March 2019 (UTC)


 * Ah, good. I'd thought I'd seen a mention through 1910 but that could have been a year range of photographs. The 21st century was because I always have to think "is it plus one or minus one", which may be _why_ I took a second look at the phrase to begin with. Shenme (talk) 18:06, 29 March 2019 (UTC)

TFA
Thank you for the Georgetown Car Barn, "a historic building in the Georgetown neighborhood of Washington, D.C. that once served as a hub station and storage facility for the city's trolley cars. Construction of the building required excavation of a massive amount of earth, leading to the construction of the Exorcist steps. Gradually, it was converted into office space, housing the International Police Academy, and is now used by Georgetown University. Today, it is one of the most prominent buildings of the Georgetown skyline."! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:46, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Thank you, Gerda Arendt, for your kind words.  Ergo Sum  14:12, 31 March 2019 (UTC)

DYK for John W. Beschter
DYKUpdateBot (talk) 00:01, 2 April 2019 (UTC)

Luxembourgish is a language
Today's hook reads "John W. Beschter, a Luxembourgish Jesuit". Luxembourgish cannot be used to describe people. It should read "John W. Beschter, a Luxembourg Jesuit".--Ipigott (talk) 06:31, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
 * I did not make that change, but I will mention this on the Main Page errors page.  Ergo Sum  12:21, 2 April 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Bowen v. Georgetown University Hospital
&mdash; Amakuru (talk) 00:01, 13 May 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Georgetown Neighborhood Library
&mdash; Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 15 May 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of William McSherry
The article William McSherry you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:William McSherry for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 17:43, 21 May 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Thomas F. Mulledy
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Thomas F. Mulledy you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 15:02, 24 May 2019 (UTC)

DYK for St. John's Episcopal Church, Georgetown
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 2 June 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of John W. Beschter
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article John W. Beschter you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 19:42, 2 June 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Alphonsus J. Donlon
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Alphonsus J. Donlon you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 20:02, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Thomas F. Mulledy
The article Thomas F. Mulledy you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Thomas F. Mulledy for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 21:21, 25 May 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of John W. Beschter
The article John W. Beschter you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:John W. Beschter for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 19:02, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Alphonsus J. Donlon
The article Alphonsus J. Donlon you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Alphonsus J. Donlon for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 19:01, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

Four Award

 * I was about to award you this award (I just saw your post at my talkpage). Congratulations! I look forward to more articles from you on the Main Page. MX ( ✉  •  ✎  ) 15:12, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the thought. I hate to put in a shameless plug, but I do have articles pending at GAN that I’d like to eventually get to FA, as well as one article that is already at FAC. The biggest obstacle is the months that go by before a review is done (if ever). If you’re at all interested in GAN or FAC reviewing, I’d very much appreciate any attention you gave those nominations.  Ergo Sum  18:53, 2 July 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Thomas F. Mulledy
The article Thomas F. Mulledy you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Thomas F. Mulledy for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 13:22, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

DYK for William Feiner
Gatoclass (talk) 00:02, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of John W. Beschter
The article John W. Beschter you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:John W. Beschter for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 13:22, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

Editing News #1—July 2019
Read this in another language • Subscription list for this multilingual newsletter

Did you know?

Did you know that you can use the visual editor on a mobile device?

Every article has a pencil icon at the top. Tap on the pencil icon to start editing.

 Edit Cards 



This is what the new Edit Cards for editing links in the mobile visual editor look like. You can try the prototype here: 📲 Try Edit Cards.

Welcome back to the Editing newsletter.

Since the last newsletter, the team has released two new features for the mobile visual editor and has started developing three more. All of this work is part of the team's goal to make editing on mobile web simpler.

Before talking about the team's recent releases, we have a question for you:

Are you willing to try a new way to add and change links?

If you are interested, we would value your input! You can try this new link tool in the mobile visual editor on a separate wiki.

Follow these instructions and share your experience:

📲 Try Edit Cards.

Recent releases
The mobile visual editor is a simpler editing tool, for smartphones and tablets using the mobile site. The Editing team has recently launched two new features to improve the mobile visual editor:


 * 1) Section editing
 * 2) * The purpose is to help contributors focus on their edits.
 * 3) * The team studied this with an A/B test. This test showed that contributors who could use section editing were 1% more likely to publish the edits they started than people with only full-page editing.
 * 4) Loading overlay
 * 5) * The purpose is to smooth the transition between reading and editing.

Section editing and the new loading overlay are now available to everyone using the mobile visual editor.

New and active projects
This is a list of our most active projects. Watch these pages to learn about project updates and to share your input on new designs, prototypes and research findings.


 * Edit cards: This is a clearer way to add and edit links, citations, images, templates, etc. in articles. You can try this feature now.  Go here to see how: 📲Try Edit Cards.
 * Mobile toolbar refresh: This project will learn if contributors are more successful when the editing tools are easier to recognize.
 * Mobile visual editor availability: This A/B test asks: Are newer contributors more successful if they use the mobile visual editor?  We are collaborating with 20 Wikipedias to answer this question.
 * Usability improvements: This project will make the mobile visual editor easier to use.  The goal is to let contributors stay focused on editing and to feel more confident in the editing tools.

Looking ahead

 * Wikimania: Several members of the Editing Team will be attending Wikimania in August 2019.  They will lead a session about mobile editing in the Community Growth space.  Talk to them about how editing can be improved.
 * Talk Pages: In the coming months, the Editing Team will begin improving talk pages and communication on the wikis.

Learning more
The VisualEditor on mobile is a good place to learn more about the projects we are working on. The team wants to talk with you about anything related to editing. If you have something to say or ask, please leave a message at Talk:VisualEditor on mobile.

PPelberg (WMF) (talk) and Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 21:25, 15 July 2019 (UTC)