User talk:Ergo Sum/Archive 5

Your GA nomination of Robert Molyneux
The article Robert Molyneux you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Robert Molyneux for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 08:41, 2 April 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Robert Molyneux
The article Robert Molyneux you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Robert Molyneux for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 14:42, 3 April 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Giovanni Antonio Grassi
— Maile (talk) 00:01, 21 April 2020 (UTC)

DYK for John Early (educator)
Vanamonde (Talk) 12:01, 22 April 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Robert Molyneux
&mdash; Amakuru (talk) 12:02, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

Your help desk question
Did you ever get help with this? The heading was "Help_with_" and it's the first question. No one answered. I have been kind of slow reading the Help Desk archives lately.— Vchimpanzee  •  talk  •  contributions  •  21:12, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
 * No, I didn't. I tried to tinker around with it myself, but couldn't get it working.  Ergo Sum  22:55, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
 * The only thing I can suggest is WP:VPT. I used to see Help Desk archives a lot faster, but they changed how the Teahouse is archived.— Vchimpanzee  •  talk  •  contributions  •  15:06, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

Samuel Mulledy scheduled for TFA
This is to let you know that Samuel Mulledy has been scheduled as WP:TFA for 31 May 2020. Please check that the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Today's featured article/May 31, 2020. Thanks! Ealdgyth (talk) 16:48, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

James A. Ryder scheduled for TFA
This is to let you know that James A. Ryder has been scheduled as WP:TFA for 1 May 2020. Please check that the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Today's featured article/May 1, 2020. Thanks! Ealdgyth (talk) 14:59, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for the article "about a 19th-century Jesuit who was president of three universities four times. He was a major figure in Jesuit academia in the United States, helping start up two of the universities"! - and the next one to come, great! - I want to nominate Monteverdi's Vespro for FAC on his birthday, in the month of Mary, - peer review is over, but informal improvements and suggestions are welcome. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:39, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – May 2020
News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2020). Administrator changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Gnangarra • Kaisershatner • Malcolmxl5

CheckUser changes
 * Gnome-colors-view-refresh.svg Callanecc

Oversight changes
 * Gnome-colors-view-refresh.svg HJ Mitchell

Guideline and policy news
 * Discretionary sanctions have been authorized for all pages and edits related to COVID-19, to be logged at WP:GS/COVID19.
 * Following a recent discussion on Meta-Wiki, the edit filter maintainer global group has been created.
 * A request for comment has been proposed to create a new main page editor usergroup.
 * A request for comment has been proposed to make the bureaucrat activity requirements more strict.

Technical news
 * The Editing team has been working on the talk pages project. You can review the proposed design and share your thoughts on the talk page.
 * created a script that will show a link to the proper Special:Undelete page when viewing a since-deleted revision, see User:Enterprisey/link-deleted-revs.

Miscellaneous
 * A request for comment closed with consensus to create a Village Pump-style page for communication with the Wikimedia Foundation.

Discuss this newsletter

Subscribe

Archive Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:19, 2 May 2020 (UTC)

Coronavirus move discussion
Hello Ergo Sum! I do agree with you that "Coronavirus pandemic" would be a good name to the page 2019–20 coronavirus pandemic page. However, the current proposal is to move to "COVID-19 pandemic". I'm afraid your comment will too easily be counted as a "support" to the current proposal. Since you seem to oppose that proposal, I'm very tempted to edit your comment to start with "Oppose" instead of "support". However, that might be illegal... St.nerol (talk) 16:25, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Apt advice.  Ergo Sum  18:13, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Blocking IP's indefinitely
Why are you blocking IP addresses indefinitely? That's almost never called for. Sro23 (talk) 02:21, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
 * My general disposition is to block for the shortest amount of time that I think will resolve the issue. In this case, I have noticed a pattern in which multiple IP addresses are engaging in the same repeated vandalism over a long period of time (weeks) on multiple articles. As a result, I have opened a sockpuppet investigation. Given these circumstances, I believe an indefinite block is warranted pending the outcome of the investigation.  Ergo Sum  02:32, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
 * I'm not the most knowledgeable when it comes to proxy detection, but they appear to be Webhosts or open proxies, so they probably should remain blocked for a while, but it's likely that at some point in the future they will no longer be open proxies. So as long as you do unblock them eventually I guess I don't have a problem with that. BTW, the SPI you're looking for is Sockpuppet investigations/CGSFH. Sro23 (talk) 02:43, 20 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Hmm, wanted to drop a note about this. IPs should typically not be indefinitely soft-blocked, a medium-duration hardblock makes more sense. The only way IPs are retained for a long-time is when organizations (ISPs/institutions/companies) directly lease it for an indefinite period and even then, it will show up as attached to that organization - this vandalism is using closed proxies which means that the proxy might be used genuinely at a certain point of time or it might cease to be a proxy, making indefinite bans pointless. -- qedk ( t  愛  c ) 16:09, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the heads up. I assumed that the sockmaster was using a VPN to bounce around different IPs and that those IP addresses would have to be unblocked at some point. I just implemented an indefinite block as a quick fix to a time-sensitive problem. I intend to unblock them.  Ergo Sum  22:06, 20 May 2020 (UTC)

A request
Hello, we haven't interacted before but I've been following your writing for some time and it's a great source of inspiration. I'm chasing my first FA at FAC right now, and it's a biography of the judge Lord Goff of Chieveley. I read in your bio that you enjoy law, and I thought I'd ask whether you would be willing to weigh in? I'd be very grateful. No worries if not, of course. If you're able, though, the page is linked here. Kohlrabi Pickle (talk) 15:31, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Sure, I'm rather busy at the moment off-wiki, but please remind me in a few days if I forget.  Ergo Sum  16:50, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
 * It's kind of you to help. There's no rush (as far as I know?) and I will be sure to remind you in a few days if that's necessary. Thanks again. Kohlrabi Pickle (talk) 17:06, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Hello again, this is just a friendly reminder, if you still have the time, to have a look at the article, please. Many thanks. Kohlrabi Pickle (talk) 03:42, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Will do,  Ergo Sum   13:14, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Thank you for taking the time to write down those helpful comments, . I am very appreciative and will work on them over the next couple of days. Could I ask that you reproduce them (really just copy and paste?) onto the FAC nomination page, linked here? I'm new to this but I understand that FA nominations can fail for a lack of commenters, and it would probably be helpful to the nomination if the closing admin saw that I've received comments from you and addressed them. Again, though, thank you for your time - I understand that you're busy off-wiki. Kohlrabi Pickle (talk) 01:21, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Not a problem. I've gone ahead and just moved them entirely to the FAC subpage, to keep the conversation streamlined.  Ergo Sum  01:48, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Thank you! Kohlrabi Pickle (talk) 02:24, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
 * If you feel like taking a look at another pending FAC for comparison (and also giving me a hand with one that seems to be stalled), you can see Featured article candidates/Joseph A. Lopez/archive1. Completely optional, of course.  Ergo Sum  01:33, 21 May 2020 (UTC)

I'd be delighted to return the favour, and this is especially interesting to me because I have family currently studying at Georgetown. Another newbie question: when does it need to be done by? I've stupidly put up an article at FAC while I have exams going on. Kohlrabi Pickle (talk) 02:21, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Much appreciated, . Well, it's been up over 3 weeks, so I'd say within a week or so the FAC coordinators will begin to look at whether it's likely a doomed nom. Between now and then would be ideal. Edit: or were you referring to when the Goff FAC will close?  Ergo Sum  02:39, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Okay then, I'll get it done within the next week. I was referring to the Lopez one, but it's also useful to know that the Goff one has a lifespan of about a month. Do you know how many reviews it needs for the FAC coordinators to approve it? I know you've said the Lopez one has stalled, but it seems like it already has 2 sets of comments, and I'm not sure what you mean by "stalled". Kohlrabi Pickle (talk) 03:49, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
 * In my experience, with 3 supports, an article is good to go. With 2, it's on the fence.  Ergo Sum  04:00, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks! Also, I've written some comments on the Lopez article's FAC subpage. Kohlrabi Pickle (talk) 06:29, 21 May 2020 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Basilica of Sant'Alessandro
Hello! Your submission of Basilica of Sant'Alessandro at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 19:46, 20 May 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Basilica of Sant'Alessandro
Vanamonde (Talk) 00:01, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

May 2020
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. ElKevbo (talk) 22:41, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
 * Thank you,, but that is not an edit war. I made two reverts. One of another editor, and one of you. Happy to have you join the discussion that is already ongoing on the talkpage (here).  Ergo Sum  00:59, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

TFA
Thank you today for Samuel Mulledy, "about a Catholic priest who had a less-than-stellar track record as a Jesuit. He became the president of Georgetown University, but was relieved after just a few months and then was booted from the Jesuit order. He drifted around and then was re-admitted on his death bed."! - I am in the process of collecting hymns for Pentecost, many relying on Veni Creator Spiritus, and the question came up if that hymn needs quotation marks. Nunc dimittis doesn't. What do you think? - I was surprised how few English hymns have an article. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:55, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Thank you, . Interesting question. I really don't know; my instinct would be to place it in quotes, since I can't think of a reason why the English should not be in quotes when other languages are, but I don't have a good justification beyond that. Do you know of any reason?  Ergo Sum  17:40, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
 * I really don't where the line is between a one-word term such as Requiem and Magnificat, two words Nunc dimittis, and three words. I'd understand "Veni creator spiritus", but the capitals English uses clearly mark it as not the normal prose. - In the TFA, I believe that most people would know what Catholic means, but Priesthood in the Catholic Church is really something special ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:02, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – June 2020
News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2020). Administrator changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-add.svg CaptainEek • Creffett • Cwmhiraeth
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Anna Frodesiak • Buckshot06 • Ronhjones • SQL

CheckUser changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg SQL

Guideline and policy news
 * A request for comment asks whether the Unblock Ticket Request System (UTRS) should allowed any unblock request or just private appeals.
 * The Wikimedia Foundation that they will develop a universal code of conduct for all WMF projects. There is an open local discussion regarding the same.

Arbitration
 * A motion was passed to enact a 500/30 restriction on articles related to the history of Jews and antisemitism in Poland during World War II (1933–45), including the Holocaust in Poland. Article talk pages where disruption occurs may also be managed with the stated restriction.

Discuss this newsletter

Subscribe

Archive Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:27, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

Editing news 2020 #2 – Quick updates
Read this in another language • Subscription list



This edition of the Editing newsletter includes information the Talk pages project, an effort to help contributors communicate on wiki more easily. The central project page is on MediaWiki.org.


 * Reply tool : This is available as a Beta Feature at the four partner wikis (Arabic, Dutch, French, and Hungarian Wikipedias). The Beta Feature will get new features soon.  The new features include writing comments in a new visual editing mode and pinging other users by typing  . You can test the new features on the Beta Cluster.  Some other wikis will have a chance to try the Beta Feature in the coming months.
 * New requirements for user signatures : Soon, users will not be able to save invalid custom signatures in Special:Preferences. This will reduce signature spoofing, prevent page corruption, and make new talk page tools more reliable.  Most editors will not be affected.
 * New discussion tool : The Editing team is beginning work on a simpler process for starting new discussions.   You can see the initial design on the project page.
 * Research on the use of talk pages : The Editing team worked with the Wikimedia research team to study how talk pages help editors improve articles.  We learned that new editors who use talk pages make more edits to the main namespace than new editors who don't use talk pages.

– Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 18:11, 15 June 2020 (UTC)

David Hillhouse Buel (priest) scheduled for TFA
This is to let you know that the David Hillhouse Buel (priest) article has been scheduled as today's featured article for July 19, 2020. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Today's featured article/July 19, 2020, but note that a coordinator will trim the lead to around 1000 characters anyway, so you aren't obliged to do so.

For Featured Articles promoted recently, there will be an existing blurb linked from the FAC talk page, which is likely to be transferred to the TFA page by a coordinator at some point.

We suggest that you watchlist Main Page/Errors from the day before this appears on Main Page. Thanks! Jimfbleak - talk to me?  13:19, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

O'Donovan
If you would like one of the >25 other photographs better, or would like to have one cropped, don't hesitate to change the picture or ask me. Vysotsky (talk) 21:12, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – July 2020
News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2020).

Administrator changes
 * Gnome-colors-view-refresh.svg Malcolmxl5
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg John • TheCoffee • Tim!
 * Pictogram voting rename.png →
 * Pictogram voting rename.png →

CheckUser changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Bbb23

Interface administrator changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-add.svg TonyBallioni

Guideline and policy news
 * A request for comment is in progress to remove the T2 (template that misrepresents established policy) speedy deletion criterion.

Technical news
 * Protection templates on mainspace pages are now automatically added by User:MusikBot II (BRFA).

Arbitration
 * Following the banning of an editor by the WMF last year, the Arbitration Committee resolved to hold an RfC regarding on-wiki harassment. The RfC has been posted at Arbitration Committee/Anti-harassment RfC and is open to comments from the community.
 * The Medicine case was closed, with a remedy authorizing standard discretionary sanctions for all discussions about pharmaceutical drug prices and pricing and for edits adding, changing, or removing pharmaceutical drug prices or pricing from articles.

Discuss this newsletter

Subscribe

Archive Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:25, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

Editing news 2020 #3


Seven years ago this week, the Editing team made the visual editor available by default to all logged-in editors using the desktop site at the English Wikipedia. Here's what happened since its introduction:


 * The 50 millionth edit using the visual editor on desktop was made this year. More than 10 million edits have been made here at the English Wikipedia.
 * More than 2 million new articles have been created in the visual editor. More than 600,000 of these new articles were created during 2019.
 * Almost 5 million edits on the mobile site have been made with the visual editor. Most of these edits have been made since the Editing team started improving the mobile visual editor in 2018.
 * The proportion of all edits made using the visual editor has been increasing every year.
 * Editors have made more than 7 million edits in the 2017 wikitext editor, including starting 600,000 new articles in it. The 2017 wikitext editor is VisualEditor's built-in wikitext mode.  You can enable it in your preferences.
 * On 17 November 2019, the first edit from outer space was made in the mobile visual editor.
 * In 2019, 35% of the edits by newcomers, and half of their first edits, were made using the visual editor. This percentage has been increasing every year since the tool became available.

Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 02:05, 3 July 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:National Italian American Foundation logo.png
Thanks for uploading File:National Italian American Foundation logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:42, 5 July 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Robert Plunkett
—valereee (talk) 00:02, 7 July 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Robert Plunkett
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Robert Plunkett you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Coffeeandcrumbs -- Coffeeandcrumbs (talk) 12:41, 7 July 2020 (UTC)

Many thanks
Just thought I would write to tell you that the Lord Goff page has been promoted to FA. It's a very proud milestone for me. Thank you for your help with the review. Kohlrabi Pickle (talk) 11:52, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Great to hear that. Congratulations.  Ergo Sum  14:35, 8 July 2020 (UTC)

Category:Pastors has been nominated for merging
Category:Pastors has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 08:21, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Anthony Kohlmann
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Anthony Kohlmann you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Whiteguru -- Whiteguru (talk) 06:40, 12 July 2020 (UTC)

TFA
Thank you today for David Hillhouse Buel (priest), about "a President of Georgetown University at the turn of the 20th century who was very unpopular there, left for New England, quit the Jesuits, left the Catholic Church, caused a scandal by marrying, became an Episcopal minister, and died in poverty"! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:10, 19 July 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Thomas H. Stack
— Wug·a·po·des​ 19:19, 21 July 2020 (UTC) 12:02, 24 July 2020 (UTC)

John W. Beschter scheduled for TFA
This is to let you know that John W. Beschter has been scheduled as WP:TFA for 22 August 2020. Please check that the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Today's featured article/August 22, 2020. Thanks! Ealdgyth (talk) 14:20, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Robert Plunkett
The article Robert Plunkett you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Robert Plunkett for issues which need to be addressed. --- C &amp; C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 17:18, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Robert Plunkett
The article Robert Plunkett you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Robert Plunkett for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Coffeeandcrumbs -- Coffeeandcrumbs (talk) 00:02, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – August 2020
News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2020). Administrator changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-add.svg Red Phoenix
 * Gnome-colors-view-refresh.svg Euryalus • SQL
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Jujutacular • Monty845 • Rettetast • Madchester

Oversight changes
 * Gnome-colors-view-refresh.svg GB fan
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Keegan • Opabinia regalis • Premeditated Chaos

Guideline and policy news
 * There is an open request for comment to decide whether to increase the minimum duration a sanction discussion has to remain open (currently 24 hours).
 * Speedy deletion criterion T2 (template that misrepresents established policy) has been repealed following a request for comment.
 * Speedy deletion criterion X2 (pages created by the content translation tool) has been repealed following a discussion.
 * There is a proposal to restrict proposed deletion to confirmed users.

Discuss this newsletter

Subscribe

Archive Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:20, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Anthony Kohlmann
The article Anthony Kohlmann you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Anthony Kohlmann for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Whiteguru -- Whiteguru (talk) 01:02, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Edward B. Bunn
— Maile (talk) 00:01, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Anthony Kohlmann
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:01, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

Elizabeth Willing Powel
Hi friend, I am planning on nominating my first FA (Elizabeth Willing Powel) with (if they have the time). Since you have so many FAs under your belt and gave the article its GA review, I thought I would ask your advise for any thing I should address before jumping into FAC. --- C &amp; C ( Coffeeandcrumbs ) 16:42, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Hi . Having just giving another cursory look, I can't say I see anything that should hold it up. It looks like a quality article (and an interesting subject!). Let me know when you nominate it at FAC so that I can give it a closer look and presumably support.  Ergo Sum  16:52, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Featured article candidates/Elizabeth Willing Powel/archive1. Thanks! --- C &amp; C ( Coffeeandcrumbs ) 18:51, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Timothy S. Healy
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:02, 6 August 2020 (UTC)

Vatican ecclesiastical court
Hi Ergo Sum

Curious why you've reinstated a term which simply doesn't appear in the sources or in any of the articles (including the body of the article in question)... Perhaps by some interpretations the Vatican uses "ecclesiastical courts", but as far as I can tell they're not generally called that, and we shouldn't introduce some concept in the lead which is not then backed up or substantiated in the body. Google gives a total of 14 non-Wikipedia hits. I think my change was definitely more clear and more true to what the source says, and was an improvement to the article. Cheers &mdash; Amakuru (talk) 15:02, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Hi, I don't consider it a "term," but just a phrase made up of two adjectives and a noun. All of Catholic canon law is administered by ecclesiastical courts. Indeed, by definition, any court that is run by a church and decides questions pertaining to religion is an ecclesiastical court (as opposed to a civil court). The Vatican part just describes where the church was located (and also suggests that the case was likely decided from an appellate posture). It would less accurate to simply say a Vatican court or that the case was heard by the Vatican since the Vatican does have non-canon law courts (e.g. that handle petty crime inside Vatican City) and because the Vatican is a county; countries don't hear cases, but their courts do. I really don't see how the phrase "Vatican ecclesiastical court" is inaccurate at all. It was a lawsuit, heard by an ecclesiastical court, in the Vatican.  Ergo Sum  15:38, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
 * OK, thanks for the explanation, and not a massive deal then. &mdash; Amakuru (talk) 15:45, 9 August 2020 (UTC)

Four Award
This is also your tenth Four Award, making you one of only thirteen users listed on the leaderboard. Congratulations! epicgenius (talk) 15:57, 10 August 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Leo J. O'Donovan
&mdash; Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 12 August 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Robert J. Henle
&mdash; Amakuru (talk) 12:02, 12 August 2020 (UTC)

Editing news 2020 #4
Read this in another language • Subscription list for this newsletter

Reply tool


The Reply tool  has been available as a Beta Feature at the Arabic, Dutch, French and Hungarian Wikipedias since 31 March 2020. The first analysis showed positive results.


 * More than 300 editors used the Reply tool at these four Wikipedias. They  posted more than 7,400 replies during the study period.
 * Of the people who posted a comment with the Reply tool, about 70% of them used the tool multiple times. About 60% of them used it on multiple days.
 * Comments from Wikipedia editors are positive. One said, أعتقد أن الأداة تقدم فائدة ملحوظة؛ فهي تختصر الوقت لتقديم رد بدلًا من التنقل بالفأرة إلى وصلة تعديل القسم أو الصفحة، التي تكون بعيدة عن التعليق الأخير في الغالب، ويصل المساهم لصندوق التعديل بسرعة باستخدام الأداة.  ("I think the tool has a significant impact; it saves time to reply while the classic way is to move with a mouse to the Edit link to edit the section or the page which is generally far away from the comment. And the user reaches to the edit box so quickly to use the Reply tool.")

The Editing team released the Reply tool as a Beta Feature at eight other Wikipedias in early August. Those Wikipedias are in the Chinese, Czech, Georgian, Serbian, Sorani Kurdish, Swedish, Catalan, and Korean languages. If you would like to use the Reply tool at your wiki, please tell User talk:Whatamidoing (WMF).

The Reply tool is still in active development. Per request from the Dutch Wikipedia and other editors, you will be able to customize the edit summary. (The default edit summary is "Reply".) A "ping" feature is available in the Reply tool's visual editing mode. This feature searches for usernames. Per request from the Arabic Wikipedia, each wiki will be able to set its own preferred symbol for pinging editors. Per request from editors at the Japanese and Hungarian Wikipedias, each wiki can define a preferred signature prefix in the page MediaWiki:Discussiontools-signature-prefix. For example, some languages omit spaces before signatures. Other communities want to add a dash or a non-breaking space.

New requirements for user signatures

 * The new requirements for custom user signatures began on 6 July 2020. If you try to create a custom signature that does not meet the requirements, you will get an error message.
 * Existing custom signatures that do not meet the new requirements will be unaffected temporarily . Eventually, all custom signatures will need to meet the new requirements. You can check your signature and see lists of active editors whose custom signatures need to be corrected.  Volunteers have been contacting editors who need to change their custom signatures.  If you need to change your custom signature, then please read the help page.

Next: New discussion tool
Next, the team will be working on a tool for quickly and easily starting a new discussion section to a talk page. To follow the development of this new tool, please put the New Discussion Tool project page on your watchlist.

Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 18:48, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

TFA
Thank you today for John W. Beschter, "about a Luxembourg Jesuit who became a missionary to the rural United States, and did a brief stint as president of Georgetown University"! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:11, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks .  Ergo Sum  16:45, 22 August 2020 (UTC)


 * Every once in a while, I have a TFA as well, happy that it was also a tribute to Brian, in great collaboration, fine Main page, and see also. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:45, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
 * I was wondering who wrote that FA. A nice job and a nice tribute.  Ergo Sum  14:01, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – September 2020
News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2020). Administrator changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-add.svg Eddie891
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Angela • Jcw69 • Just Chilling • Philg88 • Viajero

CheckUser changes
 * Gnome-colors-view-refresh.svg SQL

Guideline and policy news
 * Following a request for comment, the minimum length for site ban discussions was increased to 72 hours, up from 24.
 * A request for comment is ongoing to determine whether paid editors must or should use the articles for creation process.
 * A request for comment is open to resolve inconsistencies between the draftification and alternative to deletion processes.

Arbitration
 * A request for comment is open to provide an opportunity to amend the structure, rules, and procedures of the 2020 English Wikipedia Arbitration Committee election and to resolve any issues not covered by existing rules.
 * An open request for comment asks whether active Arbitrators may serve on the Trust and Safety Case Review Committee or Ombudsman commission.

Discuss this newsletter

Subscribe

Archive Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:56, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Kenosha RfC
I commented out your RfC. I think your version of the lead is better than what was restored but I don't think that was a good RfC. It was very nebulous and open ended. I would suggest trying to refine it into a specific difference(s) and say current vs proposed or similar. As posed I think that RfC was going to fail and likely piss off some people. I don't want you to think I was trying to silence your version. Springee (talk) 15:51, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Appreciate the feedback. I thought about how I could best word it but concluded that leaving it open ended would be the most neutral way of framing the issue. I might go back and refine it.  Ergo Sum  23:45, 5 September 2020 (UTC)

Georgetown presidents
I am very excited by the prospect of you getting around to Patrick Francis Healy. Please ping me, profusely. --- C &amp; C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 06:30, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
 * I'm excited to get that one up to FA too. I've already done 95% of my work on it. (See the version before I started working on it for comparison). Sadly, it's been sitting untouched at GAN for a while (along with a whole bunch of other GANs on my list). By all means, if you have any interest in doing the GAN review, it'd be much appreciated.  Ergo Sum  14:02, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Looks like that time has come. I've just nominated Healy as a FAC. Your comments there would be much appreciated.  Ergo Sum  13:51, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
 * , exciting! I will do a review sometime this weekend. --- C &amp; C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 16:09, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Thank you, . I'm fearful that this nom might fail for lack of input, as my last FAC did. I hope not, since Healy was such an interesting person.  Ergo Sum  17:19, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

For the record
I apologize for having wasted your time with my pitiful attempts at humor/humour – unless, of course, you did "get" my email. Anyway, here ya go (edit conflict just now from the article's talk page).


 * The students (we don't know or care how many) and the Jesuits (again, nobody's counting) were all objects of his discipline (the subject) – reading left to right, "...{nbs}}both the students..." causes us (me, anyway) to stumble right into some{?!) non-Jesuit students. I give up. --Brogo13 (talk) 22:51, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
 * You are quite right. Turns out it was my obtuseness after all. I've restored your last edit.  Ergo Sum  23:58, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – September 2020
News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2020). Administrator changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-add.svg Ajpolino • LuK3
 * Gnome-colors-view-refresh.svg Jackmcbarn
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Ad Orientem • Harej • Lid • Lomn • Mentoz86 • Oliver Pereira • XJaM
 * Pictogram voting rename.png →

Guideline and policy news
 * A request for comment found consensus that incubation as an alternative to deletion should generally only be recommended when draftification is appropriate, namely 1) if the result of a deletion discussion is to draftify; or 2) if the article is newly created.

Technical news
 * The filter log now provides links to view diffs of deleted revisions (T261630).

Arbitration
 * The 2020 CheckUser and Oversight appointment process has begun. The community consultation period will take place from September 27th to October 7th.
 * Following a request for comment, sitting Committee members may not serve on either the Ombuds Commission or the WMF Case Review Committee. The Arbitration Committee passed a motion implementing those results into their procedures.

Miscellaneous
 * The Universal Code of Conduct draft is open for community review and comment until October 6th, 2020.
 * Office actions may now be appealed to the Interim Trust & Safety Case Review Committee.

Discuss this newsletter

Subscribe

Archive Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:42, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Thomas H. Stack
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Thomas H. Stack you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 13:42, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Thomas H. Stack
The article Thomas H. Stack you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Thomas H. Stack for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 14:02, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Edward B. Bunn
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Edward B. Bunn you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 04:21, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of W. Coleman Nevils
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article W. Coleman Nevils you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 15:01, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of W. Coleman Nevils
The article W. Coleman Nevils you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:W. Coleman Nevils for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 03:42, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

Joseph A. Lopez scheduled for TFA
This is to let you know that the Joseph A. Lopez article has been scheduled as today's featured article for October 4, 2020. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Today's featured article/October 4, 2020, but note that a coordinator will trim the lead to around 1000 characters anyway, so you aren't obliged to do so.

For Featured Articles promoted recently, there will be an existing blurb linked from the FAC talk page, which is likely to be transferred to the TFA page by a coordinator at some point.

We suggest that you watchlist Main Page/Errors from the day before this appears on Main Page. Thanks! Jimfbleak - talk to me?  13:10, 8 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Thank you for the article, a good harvest! (in Germany, it's Thanksgiving today) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:10, 4 October 2020 (UTC)


 * A happy Thanksgiving to you!  Ergo Sum  14:39, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Thank you! I heard music the night before, - enchanting, said a critic about the Mendelssohn, - this video is older, and the YT in the article comes with a Bach encore, as she played for us. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:03, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Beautiful.  Ergo Sum  20:15, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
 * 16 October memories --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:19, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
 * I appreciate your steady supply of esoteric and fascinating factoids. Don't you miss the days when ballets could cause riots?  Ergo Sum  20:37, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
 * More of half of my "topics" are supplied by LouisAlain who supplies many more, - I just pick what I find fascinating, such as this bio, - not remembered because he refused to record, more or less. Musing about banning ballet and editors at the bottom of the page, under the DYK. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:48, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Thomas H. Stack
The article Thomas H. Stack you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Thomas H. Stack for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 12:22, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Edward B. Bunn
The article Edward B. Bunn you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Edward B. Bunn for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 15:42, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Francis Neale
The article Francis Neale you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Francis Neale for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Governor Sheng -- Governor Sheng (talk) 21:41, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – November 2020
News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2020).

Administrator changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-add.svg John M Wolfson
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Bduke • Nilfanion • Philosopher • Rspeer • Yunshui

Interface administrator changes
 * Gnome-colors-view-refresh.svg Ragesoss
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg TonyBallioni

CheckUser changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-add.svg EdJohnston • Oshwah • Yamla
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Yunshui

Oversight changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-add.svg Anarchyte
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Yunshui

Guideline and policy news
 * Community sanctions now authorize administrators to place under indefinite semiprotection any article on a beauty pageant, or biography of a person known as a beauty pageant contestant, which has been edited by a sockpuppet account or logged-out sockpuppet, to be logged at WP:GS/PAGEANT.

Technical news
 * Sysops will once again be able to view the deleted history of JS/CSS pages; this was restricted to interface administrators when that group was introduced.
 * Twinkle's block module now includes the ability to note the specific case when applying a discretionary sanctions block and/or template.
 * Sysops will be able to use Special:CreateLocalAccount to create a local account for a global user that is prevented from auto-creation locally (such as by a filter or range block). Administrators that are not sure if such a creation is appropriate should contact a checkuser.

Arbitration
 * The 2020 Arbitration Committee Elections process has begun. Eligible editors will be able to nominate themselves as candidates from November 8 through November 17. The voting period will run from November 23 through December 6.
 * The Anti-harassment RfC has concluded with a summary of the feedback provided.

Miscellaneous
 * A reminder that standard discretionary sanctions are authorized for all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. (American Politics 2 Arbitration case).

Discuss this newsletter

Subscribe

Archive Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:51, 1 November 2020 (UTC)