User talk:Ergononassumpsit

January 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions, including your edits to Kevin Trudeau. However, please be aware of Wikipedia's policy that biographical information about living persons must not be libelous. Any controversial statements about a living person added to an article, or any other Wikipedia page, must include proper sources. Thank you. Momo san Gespräch 15:42, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Kevin Trudeau. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Momo san Gespräch 15:49, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Kevin Trudeau, you will be blocked from editing. Momo san Gespräch 16:14, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

A message from me to the world: It has come to my attention that various pages are either derogatory or inaccurate in their statements. Additionally they are using terms in which their meanings are misleading in there context which they are used.

It is sad that when I try to offer clarity and reasonable doubt to the accusations which they proclaim, I’m blocked from the editing of those errors.

So much for free speech in America, another infringement has esculated.

I feel I need to make my own page of definitions of special terms and colorable law definitions available to the world.

Blocked indefinitely
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest this block by adding the text below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

"unblock" I deny engaging in any disruptive behavior. I have offered clarity in definitions of special terms being used and circumstances to what has been proposed against Kevin T. on that page. I do not know him, but I have determined that there are many misleading statements therein.

I feel it is vital that people reading such an article created by a “person” or any similar type of article should be more semantically accurate to prevent the misconstruction or abuse received by unsuspecting readers. I understand this accusation against me is a sign that ambiguity is o.k.

I will refrain from correcting mistakes I find in terminology that confuses the unsuspected reader; since my offer to assist is obviously treated as “disruptive”.

Therefore, let it be known I will not offer my knowledge to correct what I know to be wrong. I understand that it is not wanted.

If offering such corrections is not wanted, then editing should not be allowed.


 * This unblock request has been declined due to your history of vandalism and/or disruption to this encyclopedia. However, we are willing to give you another chance provided that you can earn back the trust of the Wikipedia community. To be unblocked you need to demonstrate that you are willing and able to contribute positively to Wikipedia. You can do this by:


 * Familiarizing yourself with our basic rules.
 * Read our guide to improving articles
 * Pick any pre-existing article you wish to improve.
 * If you have trouble choosing an article to improve, see this index of articles needing improvement for ideas. Once you have decided on the article you will propose improvements to:
 * Click the Edit tab at the top of that article;
 * Copy the portion of the prose from that article that you will be proposing changes to. However:
 * do not copy the "infobox" from the start of the article (i.e., markup like this:  );
 * do not copy any image placement code (i.e., markup like this:  Name.jpg );
 * do not copy the page's categories from the bottom of the page (i.e., markup like this:  );
 * do not copy the stub tag (if there) from the bottom of the page (i.e., markup like this:  );
 * Click edit at your talk page, and paste at the bottom under a new section header (like this: ) the copied content but do not save yet ;
 * Place your cursor in the edit summary box and paste there an edit summary in the following form which specifies the name of the article you copied from and links to it (this is required for mandatory copyright attribution): "Copied content from [ [exact Name of Article]] ; see that article's history for attribution."
 * You can now save the page. However, if your edits will include citations to reliable sources (which they should), place at the end of the prose you copied this template   and then save.


 * Now, edit that content to propose significant and well researched improvements by editing the selected portion of the article. Please note that we are not looking for basic typo corrections, or small unreferenced additions; your edits should be substantial, and reflect relevant policies.
 * When you are done with your work, re-request unblocking and an administrator will review your proposed edits.
 * If we (including the original blocking admin) are convinced that your proposed edits will improve Wikipedia as an encyclopedia, you will be unblocked.

If you need help while working with your proposed edits, you may add "" to your talk page. Thank you. PhilKnight (talk) 20:20, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

BE IT KNOWN TO ALL: Based on your “basic rules” and “guide to improving articles;” I have determined that your reason for blocking me are frivolous and dishonorable at best. Therefore, your offer to communicate is accepted for value and your dishonor is returned to you. I no longer have any interest or desire to correct grammatical mistakes and misleading statements created to bash anyone publically on this site. That’s your problem; I get it.

Therefore I will only focus my attention on creating my own pages with “accurately defined words and special terms” not to mislead the ignorant or bash the innocent; who would happily hire some ambulance chasing attorney and sue for meritless claims without good cause and reason. Which such suits has become the norm in this country. So good luck to you.