User talk:Eric55lv

Your comments regarding the controversy over the name of the Las Vegas Plaza have been reverted because you did not cite a reliable source that verifies your statement. Realkyhick 06:44, 21 August 2007 (UTC)


 * A specific citation is required, with publication name, article title, date of publication, and so on. See WP:REF for more info. I'm not disputing your statement, but it simply must be backed up with a source citation. Realkyhick 18:39, 21 August 2007 (UTC)


 * That's what we're looking for! I put the references into standard Wikipedia reference form. Many thanks. Realkyhick 23:33, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Crystal Palace Laughlin, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Davidprior 22:34, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:IPod 1st Gen.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:IPod 1st Gen.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 03:08, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:IPod 1st Gen.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:IPod 1st Gen.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 15:08, 9 September 2007 (UTC)