User talk:Eric8729

Your submission at Articles for creation: Last Cloudia (January 15)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zxcvbnm was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Last Cloudia and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Last Cloudia, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Last_Cloudia Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Zxcvbnm&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Last_Cloudia reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ZXCVBNM (TALK) 13:33, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Last Cloudia (January 19)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.


 * Draft:Last Cloudia may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:Eric8729 Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Bkissin&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:Eric8729 reviewer's talk page] . or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bkissin (talk) 16:07, 19 January 2022 (UTC)

Reply
Thanks for message. If you have a a conflict of interest you must declare it. I can advise you haw to that if necessary. I've checked for copyright, and remove some minor promo, but you still have some way to go.
 * you must provide independent verifiable sources for games to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the organisation or company, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, logs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the company or organisation claims or interviewing its management. Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls
 * I don't think any of your refs meet the definition of a reliable source, including as they do sites affiliated with the game. Some appear to be press releases or reviews rather than independent sources of real facts. The crunchyroll links don't work.


 * I can't see any indication of how this game meest the criteria for notability I've linked above. Nothing about major awards or coverage in major media. Downloads aren't in themselves a criterion for notability, but in any case you shouldn't depend on what the game's own site claims.


 * You must write in a non-promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic, with verifiable facts, not opinions or reviews. Notability doesn't depen don whether the game gets good reviews or not, that's not a criterion, but in any case giving a single positive review looks like cherry-picking. We tend to prefer aggregation sites like Rotten Tomatoes

I don't think a reviewer will pass this as it stands. It needs proper independent third-party sources, and facts that show how it meets the notability criteria Jimfbleak - talk to me?  13:59, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Last Cloudia
Hello, Eric8729. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Last Cloudia, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:01, 28 June 2022 (UTC)