User talk:EricAhlqvistScott

Your GA nomination of Louis Upton
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Louis Upton you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of EricAhlqvistScott -- EricAhlqvistScott (talk) 04:01, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

Issuing level 1 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Gardenista. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—cyberbot I  Talk to my owner :Online 05:36, 27 January 2020 (UTC)


 * Contesting this. Talk:Gardenista clearly states decision was to keep. EricAhlqvistScott (talk) 05:57, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Louis Upton
The article Louis Upton you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Louis Upton for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of EricAhlqvistScott -- EricAhlqvistScott (talk) 07:41, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

Women in Red
Hi there, EricAhlqvistScott, and welcome to Women in Red. On the basis of the work you've recently done on Julie Carlson, you are going to be a useful member. I hope you will soon be creating new biographies yourself. If so, you might find it useful to look through our Ten Simple Rules. As a Swede, you might be inspired to pick someone from our redlist on Sweden or from one of our other redlists. Please let me know if you run into any difficulties or need assistance. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 08:17, 3 February 2020 (UTC)

Riley Reid
Greetings. Would you care to elaborate which "religious views" you think motivated the AfD nomination of the above article, and what led to to the conclusion that I possess them? Thanks. —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 13:29, 3 February 2020 (UTC)

April 2020
Hello EricAhlqvistScott. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:EricAhlqvistScott. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Praxidicae (talk) 16:56, 30 April 2020 (UTC)


 * No I'm not being paid for any of my posts. EricAhlqvistScott (talk) 00:00, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

September Women in Red edithons
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:54, 29 August 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging

October editathons from Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:09, 21 September 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging

November edit-a-thons from Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:52, 28 October 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging

December with Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:43, 26 November 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging

A New Year With Women in Red!
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 03:02, 29 December 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging

April editathons from Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 20:16, 22 March 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging

May 2021 at Women in Red
--Rosiestep (talk) 21:35, 28 April 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging

August Editathons at Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:24, 23 July 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging

January 2022 Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:02, 28 December 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging

February with Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:09, 31 January 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

March editathons
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:37, 27 February 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Proposed deletion of File:EricAhlqvistScott.jpg


The file File:EricAhlqvistScott.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Unused personal photo. Out of scope."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax &laquo;&brvbar;talk&brvbar;&raquo; 14:58, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

April Editathons from Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:44, 22 March 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

May Women in Red events
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:52, 30 April 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

June events from Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 09:20, 31 May 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red in July 2022
--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:45, 27 June 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red in August 2022
--Lajmmoore (talk) 10:57, 29 July 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red in September 2022
--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:34, 31 August 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red October 2022
--Lajmmoore (talk) 14:58, 29 September 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red November 2022
--Lajmmoore (talk) 17:33, 26 October 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red December 2022
--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:53, 26 November 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red January 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 18:00, 27 December 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red in February 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:26, 30 January 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red March 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 12:52, 26 February 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red April 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:51, 27 March 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red May 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 18:27, 27 April 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red - June 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 09:15, 28 May 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red July 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:43, 27 June 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red 8th Anniversary
--Lajmmoore (talk) 11:00, 18 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red August 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 19:24, 28 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

September 2023 at Women In Red
--Victuallers (talk) 16:49, 25 August 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red October 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 10:51, 29 September 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red - November 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 08:22, 26 October 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red December 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:22, 27 November 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red February 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 20:08, 28 January 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red March 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 20:22, 25 February 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red April 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 19:41, 30 March 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red May 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 06:16, 28 April 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red June 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 07:04, 23 May 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red July 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 14:27, 30 June 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Ways to improve Robert Schleip
Hello, EricAhlqvistScott,

Thank you for creating Robert Schleip.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

"We would need to see a substantial piece on him as a notable person in a quality independent source, as I don't think he meets WP:NPROF for academics. A lot of the references are primary, or not really about him. thanks."

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with. Remember to sign your reply with. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Aszx5000 (talk) 14:53, 15 July 2024 (UTC)


 * Hey @Aszx5000,
 * I appreciate the general curation process. I've addressed the points on the talk page: Talk:Robert_Schleip. Please give it a lookover, and hopefully I've addressed the concerns.
 * Thanks,
 * EricAhlqvistScott (talk) 16:53, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Hey, I'd love another passover on the article's talk page. I believe I've made a solid case to remove the notices. If you agree, I'd really appreciate it if you removed them yourself, since you added them I think it says more than if I, the author, removes it myself. If you have further doubts, also feel free to express them and I'll do my best to address it as well as I can. EricAhlqvistScott (talk) 15:42, 19 July 2024 (UTC)