User talk:EricGPrud

Erasure
Hello there, I am contesting the move you recently made to Erasure (the band). I think your decision was a little bit premature - there are a lot of articles that link to the band article and in general I believe it is the band that is most associated with the word "Erasure". At the very least perhaps some discussion should have occurred first on its Talk Page? I've left comments there, can you please respond? An "Erasure (logic)" article hasn't even been created yet and a simple disambig link at the top of the two Erasure articles probably would have sufficed instead of moving things around and creating a new disambig page. Thanks. - eo 15:04, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

Noted and responded on discussion page. -eric 16:54, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

Nomination of Erasure (logic) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Erasure (logic) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Erasure (logic) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Paradoctor (talk) 00:37, 21 May 2018 (UTC)