User talk:EricKikkert

May 2023
Please do not add information to an article about an unrelated topic, as you did at Church of Humanity. If the topic you added is notable on its own, then you should start a new article for that topic. — Shelf Skewed  Talk  17:44, 11 May 2023 (UTC)


 * Excuse me? Hence the note also refers to as it does refer to that church. When you pull your head out your butt you will figure it out. When someone looks up church of humanity it needs to include all references to that term not just the one you want. EricKikkert (talk) 18:17, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Unrelated topics sometimes have the same name, and each should be dealt with in a separate article, with a distinct title—for example, Mercury (planet) and Mercury (element). If you think the 2020 Church of Humanity should have an article, you should create that article, with a unique title, rather than adding that information to an article about a completely different church. — Shelf Skewed  Talk  18:24, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
 * When the time comes I will re-add the information to that page and report you for removing it. You do not own that page and the related information is relevant. Keep your hands off. If appears to be unrelated to you that’s your problem as it is related to the article and to others. EricKikkert (talk) 18:23, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
 * You can start by removing Albert Einstein from this page.
 * https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass%E2%80%93energy_equivalence EricKikkert (talk) 19:20, 11 May 2023 (UTC)

Hello, I'm ShelfSkewed. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Quantum gravity have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.— Shelf Skewed  Talk  18:10, 11 May 2023 (UTC)


 * It was an inclusion of a notable formula created and available for view and even published on orcid. You don’t own the information and I would appreciate it if you would not delete valuable data the world should have access too. EricKikkert (talk) 18:19, 11 May 2023 (UTC)

Please stop adding promotional links and your own name to Wikipedia articles. See the Wikipedia policy on external link spam. Your edits are disruptive and have been reverted. signed, Willondon (talk) 18:52, 11 May 2023 (UTC)


 * Then remove every name on this site. When someone wants to look up an informational article and states it was created or solved they expect to see the name. Regardless of what you personally think that fact exists. EricKikkert (talk) 19:12, 11 May 2023 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because you are clearly not here to contribute constructively to the encyclopaedia, as is clear from your editing, using more than one account. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page:. Please bear in mind that you are still able to edit this talk page only in order to enable you to make an unblock request; if you use it to post spam, nonsense, personal attacks on other editors, or any other unconstructive material (as you have done in the past) then your ability to edit the page will be removed. JBW (talk) 20:11, 11 May 2023 (UTC)

spam-tracking info
-- A. B. (talk • contribs • global count) 03:25, 12 May 2023 (UTC)