User talk:EricXu100

June 2015
If you make a change to an article, and it gets reverted, please discuss your change on the article's talk page instead of simply re-doing the change. See BOLD, revert, discuss cycle for more information. Kendall-K1 (talk) 18:57, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

May 2015
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Hewlett-Packard has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:39, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Hewlett-Packard was changed by EricXu100 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.974983 on 2015-05-31T20:39:16+00:00.

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Motorola Mobility, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Thomas.W talk 20:45, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Hewlett-Packard, you may be blocked from editing. Thomas.W talk 20:48, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Hewlett-Packard. Final warning for repeated vandalism. Thomas.W talk 20:51, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:. —S MALL JIM   20:54, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

Lenovo
First of all, thank you for contributing to the article Lenovo. I noticed you were trying to delete the mention of Lenovo as a Chinese company. I understand how Lenovo tries to brand itself as an international company, largely due to the current lack of recognition of Chinese brands. This is understandable. However, Lenovo cannot change the fact that they are a Chinese company at root and at heart, and Wikipedia, as a neutral source of information should reflect the fact. Also, probably in a few years as more Chinese brands go global, Lenovo will be more willing to identify itself as Chinese. So let's keep the fact a fact for now, shall we?

Happy editing :) -JesseW900 (talk) 20:56, 31 May 2015 (UTC)