User talk:Eric Corbett/Archives/2019/February

IARC
Thank you for your help in getting the International Aerial Robotics Competition (IARC) article to "GOOD" status a number of years ago (in fact it was granted GOOD status about a decade ago). In the intervening time, the only changes have been to update the article with summaries of the new missions as they occurred, and an effort to keep citation links live. Recently, I noticed that an editor "Cnzx" has tagged this GOOD article as being unencyclopedic and like an "advertisement". I was wondering if you would take a look at it, as the advocate for elevating it to GOOD status, and see if you can justify the "advertisement" tag that it now bears. I believe that it has maintained its original neutral encyclopedic nature of the past 10 years and in no way has morphed into an "advertisement".  &#8259; Fire wall   02:47, 18 February 2019 (UTC)


 * The advertisement tag is clearly ridiculous,so I've removed it. It's worth pointing out though that much of the material added since the GA review is uncited, so the article's GA status could be challenged on that basis. Eric   Corbett  09:59, 18 February 2019 (UTC)

Books & Bytes, Issue 32
 The Wikipedia Library Books & Bytes

Issue 32, January – February 2019  French version of Books & Bytes is now available on meta!
 * # 1Lib1Ref
 * New and expanded partners
 * Wikimedia and Libraries User Group update
 * Global branches update
 * Bytes in brief

Read the full newsletter Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:29, 26 February 2019 (UTC)