User talk:Eric Jack Nash

--Celestianpower hab 23:00, 14 August 2005 (UTC)

Link
2006 is already linked where is states the release date. The page only needs one link for 2006, one of those needs to be removed. Bignole 18:00, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
 * I don't know if it is preferable to link to a general page (i.e. 2006 the year) or to a specific page (i.e. films of 2006). You may need to requisition a help bot for that. Otherwise, since they are going to two separate pages I don't know of a reason to not have both. Bignole 19:57, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

Links
Please refer to WP:MOS-L for more information about having too much links in an article.

Internal links

The use of links to other Wikipedia articles, for example, Ant, is encouraged. Use the links for all words and terms that are relevant to the article.

The purpose of internal links is to allow readers to easily and conveniently follow their curiosity or research to other articles. These links should be included where it is most likely that a reader would want to follow them elsewhere — for example, in article introductions, the beginnings of new sections, table cells, and image captions. Generally, where it is likely that a reader may wish to read about another topic, the reader should not have to hunt for a link elsewhere in the page.

On the other hand, do not make too many links. An article may be considered overlinked if any of the following is true:

* more than 10% of the words are contained in links; * it has more links than lines; * a link is repeated in the same article (although there may be case for duplicating an important link that is distant from the previous occurrence); * more than 10% of the links are to articles that don't exist; or   * low added-value items are linked without reason — such as, 1995, 1980s, and 20th century.

This also applies to tables, considered by themselves.

As a general rule, do not put links in the title; however, this may be acceptable with complex titles or verbose leads, such as those concerning multiple concepts.

Thanks

Electrical engineering comments
Hi Eric,

Thanks for your comments. I was mindful of building services when revising the article and so the article does actually mention building services (although not in those words) and has done so since August of 2005. Quoting from the article: From the global positioning system to electric power generation, electrical engineers are responsible for a wide range of technologies. They design, develop, test and supervise the deployment of electrical systems and electronic devices. For example, they may work on the design of telecommunication systems, the operation of electric power stations, the lighting and wiring of buildings, the design of household appliances or the electrical control of industrial machinary.

However if you feel you can improve the article further please feel free to do so.

Cedars 11:23, 28 March 2006 (UTC)

Re: Supernova
I wasn't aware that there were two bands by the same name. I dismissed the rewritten article as a hoax. I looked at the pop/punk band's Myspace page, and as far as I can tell they're not a notable band by Wikipedia standards. I'll bring this up on the talk page and see if we can reach an agreement to the band's notability. Jtrost (T | C | #) 20:06, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

Rock Star: Supernova
Just an honest mistake. I was removing a formatting error the same anon introduced, and didn't notice I had removed that paragraph either. I've put it back. Kirjtc2 14:44, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the help in the clean up. I was going back to revisit what I just wrote and it still could use some polishing. But I appreciate your help :) --vi 01:11, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

re:Rock Star - compromise
No problem. I'll be there to fix any other problems with the article or related articles. P.S. Go Magni and Josh! :P íslenska hurikein #12 (samtal) 17:49, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Well, I like Josh because he's from Manchester, NH. But I like Ryan too, especially after he sang Losing My Religion. That was awesome. íslenska hurikein #12 (samtal) 17:58, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

RfA
Check it out. I've been nominated for admin. I hope you vote. Thanx. íslenska hurikein | #12 (samtal) 19:08, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

WPWikiProject Musicians
Wikipedia is in sore need of a policy on for musician pages, and you have been active in this area before. Therefore, please provide your comments and opinions on the policies there. Thanks in advance!--Esprit15d 19:35, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

FYI
You are the spitting image of actor Jason Lee (see?)--Crestville 20:19, 30 August 2006 (UTC)


 * You made the key mistake of providing a link to your myspace site on your wikipedia profile, and me being the curious cat I am checked it out. It's a complament BTW and you look much better now than you did in that older pic where you looked a little bit like Fred Flintstone.--Crestville 18:29, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

Quarrymen
Can you sort out The Beatles line-ups? The Quarrymen is missing a lot of people.--andreasegde 16:22, 22 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Are you familiar with The Beatles line-ups? The rock family tree in The Quarrymen is continued in The Beatles line-ups.  If by missing you mean that Ringo Starr isn't listed, then the reason is because he is in the continuation in the other line-up/rock family tree.  Maybe we need to note that it is continued there.  Otherwise, if you mean something else, then please let me know and I'll try to help.  Thanks.  --luckymustard 17:20, 22 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Pete Shotton and (the other ones?) were in it. I´ll find the photo and get back to you. I don´t want to touch the editing, because it´s too complicated for an amateur... I´ll be back soon. --andreasegde 18:18, 23 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Ahhh... I see now. My point is that as it seems impossible to put the whole Quarrymen line-up on The Beatles line-ups page, is there a way of directing readers to The Quarrymen without putting the line-up on there? "See: The Quarrymen", might be better. At the moment it looks as though McCartney and Harrison were in it right at the beginning. --andreasegde 18:29, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

WikiProject The Beatles Newsletter, Issue 6, October 2006

 * Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? – It's all here.

WikiProject The Beatles Newsletter, Issue 7, November 2006

 * Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? – It's all here.

WikiProject The Beatles Newsletter Issue 8, December 2006

 * Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? – It's all here.

Wikilogos
I thought you might be interested in my proposal for Wikipedia to use logo variations created by members of the wiki community to mark national and international awareness days, Remembrance Days, notable anniversaries, and observance days. Please comment on Village_pump_(proposals) and on my talk page. Thanks! FrummerThanThou 10:40, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

WikiProject The Beatles Newsletter, Issue 9, January 2007
Hi. You are not receiving The Beatles project newsletter because we believe you are inactive. Click the link in the title, above, to see it. If you want to move yourself back to active, and get copies again, please remove your name from WikiProject The Beatles/Outreach/Newsletter/Inactive and add yourself to WikiProject The Beatles/Outreach/Newsletter/Active Thanks for your interest in the project. This is probably the last notice you will receive. ++Larbot - run by User:Lar - t/c 19:38, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

Redlink removal on List of text-based MMORPGs
Wikipedia is not an Internet directory, nor an indiscriminate collection of information - if we're including games that aren't notable enough to have Wikipedia articles, then the page becomes one or the other of these, depending on whether or not we externally link to them. --McGeddon 11:22, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
 * I don't know - the redlink issue itself is fairly clear; there's no point making a redlink for a minor MMORPG if the created article would immediately fail notability guidelines and be deleted. Making them into external links would break the "not an Internet directory" guideline - a huge list of unlinked MMORPG titles (with or without descriptions) is possibly encyclopaedic, if it makes a good attempt at being exhaustive, and sheds some light on the subject, but I think it'd have to be an "Internet directory" to some extent, to be at all useful. --McGeddon 21:34, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

News Time

 * Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? – It's all here.

BetacommandBot 23:44, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

Seinfeld WikiProject Invite
Hey there. I couldn't help noticing you appear to be interested in Seinfeld. I am interested in setting up a Seinfeld WikiProject to improve articles related to Seinfeld. At the moment I am just looking for people who are interested in joining. If you are interested in joining, please add your name here or contact me on my talk page. Thankyou, Joelster 06:17, 29 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Thankyou for expressing your interest in the Seinfeld WikiProject. Just so you know, the project has been set up and can be found here. You are welcome, but not obligated, to join anytime. Thankyou, Joelster 22:34, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Seinfeld
Thankyou for joining the Seinfeld WikiProject. Here are a few things you can do: It's up to you what you chose to do as a member of the project, in fact you don't have to do anything at all. But in any case, thankyou for joining. Joelster 06:02, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Recruit more members. (Try inviting frequent editors to articles to do with Seinfeld; check article history pages).
 * Add this template to all Seinfeld-related articles and this template to their talk pages. (A bot may be able to do this).
 * Assess articles related Seinfeld for class and importance.
 * Or just start improving articles!

WikiProject The Beatles
Your user name is on the “Inactive, or have just popped out for a cup of tea...” list on the Wikipedia:WikiProject The Beatles page. You can move it back to the “Participants” list if you feel this is not the case. :) -- WikiProject The Beatles 15:13, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

Userbox
There is an Delta Tau Delta userbox Template:User Delta Tau Delta that you could use on your page instead of your custom one. Rasamassen (talk) 18:36, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Seinfeld.
Hey Eric. I came to se if you are still interested in this project. Me, Joelster, Inkquill and Gprince007 are hard at work and could use some help. Two questions: Do you still want to do it and why? Respond to me as soon as you can. Johnnyauau2000 (talk) 12:32, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

Redesigning the Seinfeld Project Page
Hello. I have been working on redesigning the main page for the Seinfeld WikiProject at this page. So before I went on and changed the main page, I wanted to ask all the members how they felt about it. So could you take a look at it and give any suggestions to improving it at here. Thank You. -- Gman 124 talk 16:26, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

Photo consensus discussion
Hi. Can you offer your opinion on the matter discussed at the bottom of this discussion? Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 18:32, 7 March 2013 (UTC)

Requesting your opinion
Hi. Can you offer your opinion on a photo in this discussion? Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 02:56, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

Photo consensus discussion at Talk:Rick Remender
Hi. Can you offer your opinion regarding the Infobox photo discussion here? Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 19:22, 28 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Hi, again. Sorry to bother you, but another photo (more like a new set of photos) has been found and uploaded, and added to the choices in the discussion. A new issue is which photo those who participated before that photo was added would have favored had they seen it, so I'm requesting that all those who did so view the photo and indicate whether or not their favored photo has changed. Thanks, I really appreciate. Nightscream (talk) 02:12, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

Infobox photo consensus discussion
Hi. Can you offer your opinion on which photo would be better for the Rebecca Housel Infobox in this discussion? If you are unable to, I understand; you don't have to reply to this message. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 03:36, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

Infobox Photo Discussion
Hi. Can you offer your opinion in this discussion regarding the better photo for an article Infobox? Thanks, and Happy Holidays. Nightscream (talk) 23:49, 26 December 2013 (UTC)

Wil Wheaton photo discussion
Hi. Can you offer your opinion in the consensus subthread of this discussion? Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 18:16, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

Infobox photo discussion
Hi again. Happy New Year. Can you offer your opinion on which photo is better for the Infobox here? If you're not able to participate, just disregard this message; you don't have to message me. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 01:04, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:08, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Can you offer your opinion in this discussion?
Hi. In the past you've offered your opinion in choosing photos for the Infobox. Can you offer your neutral opinion in this discussion on a related topic? It may go toward a precedent regarding captions. Thanks, and Happy Holidays. Nightscream (talk) 20:10, 23 November 2018 (UTC)

Podcast
Someone has a podcast/blog/vlog and they are discussing a person/film/historical event/album/whatever. Is that podcast/blog/vlog a significant element in the history of that person/film/whatever? Probably not. Right now, there are roughly 6.3 million podcasts/blogs/vlogs discussing Star Wars/Donald Trump/Christmas 2018 sales. The are all trivial. - Sum mer PhD v2.0 20:39, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

Infobox photo discussion
Hi. Can you offer your opinion on which of two photos is preferable in this discussion? Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 15:36, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 28 November 2023 (UTC)