User talk:Eric Schucht

October 2018
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Lester W. Smith has been reverted. Your edit here to Lester W. Smith was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jTV6EuWOFxo&t=1s) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. music or video) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 04:44, 27 October 2018 (UTC)

Talkback
Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 22:10, 28 October 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Maurice H. Rees has been accepted
 Maurice H. Rees, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer. Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Robert McClenon (talk) 07:52, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Maurice_H._Rees help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Wikipedia and copyright
Hello Eric Schucht, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Bill Harris (aviator) have been removed, as they appear to have added copyrighted material without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues here.


 * You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
 * Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
 * Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Copyrights. You may also want to review Copy-paste.
 * If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Donating copyrighted materials.
 * In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
 * Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Translation. See also Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 01:07, 14 December 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Art Ducko (December 19)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Art Ducko and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Art Ducko, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Art_Ducko Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:AngusWOOF&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Art_Ducko reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF ( bark  •  sniff ) 01:44, 19 December 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nathan Levy (May 8)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nathan Levy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Nathan Levy, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Nathan_Levy Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:AngusWOOF&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Nathan_Levy reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF ( bark  •  sniff ) 16:31, 8 May 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Moses Polock has been accepted
 Moses Polock, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer. Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!  DGG ( talk ) 11:23, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Moses_Polock help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

May 2019
Your addition to A. S. W. Rosenbach has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 22:08, 16 May 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Art Ducko


Hello, Eric Schucht. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Art Ducko".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CptViraj (📧) 08:34, 19 June 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Nathan Levy concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Nathan Levy, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 22:57, 19 October 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Nathan Levy


Hello, Eric Schucht. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Nathan Levy".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia!  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 11:43, 9 November 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Miriam Weiner (genealogist)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Miriam Weiner (genealogist) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sainsf -- Sainsf (talk) 08:21, 22 April 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Miriam Weiner (genealogist)
The article Miriam Weiner (genealogist) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Miriam Weiner (genealogist) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sainsf -- Sainsf (talk) 16:41, 6 May 2020 (UTC)

COI Edit Request Assistance Catlin Gabel School
Hi User:Eric Schucht. I see you participate in WikiProject Oregon and was wondering if you would be able to assist me with edits/update to the Catlin Gabel School page? I am in a COI/paid relationship with them and am working within the Wikipedia rules to make some updates. If you are amenable to this request, we can continue our conversation on the school's page. I have a request there awaiting review. Editor User:PortlandSaint helped me with a few edits, but has perhaps gotten busy. I'd greatly appreciate your consideration of my request. My ultimate goals are always to improve Wikipedia and work within the rules and guidelines to update articles. Thank you LeepKendall (talk) 16:55, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

Hitler-fighter articles need help: Erhard Auer & Münchener Post
Erhard Auer was the Editor in Chief of the Münchener Post, it was shut down by Hitler in March 1933 immediately after he became the Reich Chancellor. Adolf Hitler and the Nazi Party called the newspaper and its editors "Giftküche" (The Poison Kitchen) and "Münchener Pest ("Munich Pestilence" or "Munich Plague"). Hitler considered the paper one of his most vexing public adversaries, and the paper was the target of libel actions by the Nazi Party. The paper was one of the few early warning voices regarding the dangers posed by the rise of the Nazi Party, although their warnings went largely unheeded at the time. Auer was imprisoned in the Dachau concentration camp and died 20 March 1945. The first book written on Erhard Auer and the Münchener Post was in 2013, in Brazil. .... 0mtwb9gd5wx (talk) 19:52, 18 September 2021 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Black Press into David Holmes Black. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g.,. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted copied template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 00:16, 10 September 2022 (UTC)

February 2023
Your edit to David Holmes Black has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 22:17, 8 February 2023 (UTC)

Sorry
Sorry about this. I don't know what I was thinking and wonder if I may have had a senior moment there. Regards, TransporterMan  ( TALK ) 19:38, 19 May 2023 (UTC)

Australian newspapers
Interesting that you add journalism project - are you aware of the relationship between the newspaper and journalism projects, that it is such that there is an argument possible that you are unnecessarily adding a redundancy?

The same question could be specifically asked of the -


 * Ships and Shipwreck


 * Death and Cemeteries

There are many other similar combinations, and I cannot remember ever seeing discussions

about whether redundancies (as perceived in these circumstances) were actually resolved,

there are very few if any recognised policy/guidelines as to project tagging... unless I missed something...

I would be very interested in your take - as having done the australian items - by precedent alone - the rest of the world waits your touch... Or perhaps what the item that suggested to you the process of adding extra tags, as guidelines of adding such closely related items are non existent. Death and cemeteries for instance is an interesting double tag that is usually found.

For the note - a considerable number of the Australian newspaper articles were created before newspaper project was started. At that stage the journalism project tag was the default choice.

They were created some years ago during a nationally coordinated exercise in trying to correlate newspaper articles with items that existed in the National Library Trove collection - so that references utilising trove collected items would not be all red links. Those items used the journalism tag, as the newspaper project and tag were not available at that time.

You may well have a good reply, or even find in my edit history inconsistencies with project tagging, the interest here is to let you know the background of the group of oz arts and tagging, and possibly a point or two for discussion... JarrahTree 13:19, 27 June 2023 (UTC)


 * I agree that using both the Newspapers and Journalism WikiProject tags is redundant. In my opinion, Newspapers should just be a work group or subset of Journalism. The reason I use both is for consistency. There is no set policy that I'm aware of that says both should always be used, but I've come to find that many pages about newspaper use one or the other, but a lot of times both. I've even found some that are tagged with the Brands or Media WikiProject tags, which I find too broad. So right now I'm adding both Newspapers and Journalism because they both seem to fit these pages the best and I don't know of an alternative solution. Eric Schucht (talk) 14:20, 27 June 2023 (UTC)


 * Thanks for your reply - I have a deep distrust of the 'media' tag after years or so of tagging ...- if you have removed brands and media, thanks. Maybe we just leave as is - correcting obvious mistakes happens, but hey, cest la vie, or whatever it is.  Keep up the good work!  JarrahTree 04:37, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks! You too. Eric Schucht (talk) 04:41, 28 June 2023 (UTC)

wp:journalism
Hi there may I ask why are you adding wp:journalism although there is wp:newspaper? Egeymi (talk) 22:40, 4 September 2023 (UTC)


 * For consistency. It appears most articles on newspapers have both the journalism and newspaper tags, so I always add both. Eric Schucht (talk) 23:50, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Hello again, you're just adding redundant wps bc WP:Journalism is a parent WP and WP:Newspapers is part of it. Hope you'll stop adding it. --Egeymi (talk) 15:37, 9 September 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Eric Schucht. Thank you for your work on CherryRoad Media. User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 01:09, 11 September 2023 (UTC)

Epoch Times
I just read Wikipedia's version or description of the Epoch Times. I find it amazing how the Epoch Times can be characterized by Wikipedia, and by yourself Eric, with such glaring inaccuracies when other truly slanted and clearly ajendized publications that interestingly enough are opposite or opposed to what the Epoch Times stands for are not characterized in the same fashion albeit opposite of. It truly shows the clear lack of any true "journalism" on Wikipedia's part. But deep inside I'm confident that you know and understand what I am saying 100%. Sad. Steven Gehrke

DYK for Winsted Citizen
—Kusma (talk) 13:07, 29 January 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Comstock's magazine has been accepted
 Comstock's magazine, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Comstock%27s_magazine help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! Jamiebuba (talk) 19:21, 27 March 2024 (UTC)

Whitehorse Star
I am assuming that you have an interest in this publication, and I know that geographically you are far nearer that newspaper's location than I am. A question I posed on the article's talk page some time ago asked whether the organ is actually named the  Whitehorse Daily Star . Certainly its online site used that title a couple of years ago. I realise that the paper no longer publishes on a daily basis, so perhaps the name has altered accordingly. I have no real interest as such, other than trying to ensure the Wikipedia article uses the correct title for the newspaper. Any thoughts ? Thanks. - Derek R Bullamore (talk) 13:51, 18 April 2024 (UTC)


 * The newspaper was called the Whitehorse Daily Star until 2019 when they dropped the word Daily from the name after they cut back on print days. Here's my source:
 * https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/north/q-a-jim-butler-whitehorse-star-closing-1.7167136 Eric Schucht (talk) 01:45, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
 * OK. Thank you for that. If it is fine with you, for completion I will copy your statement over to the article's talk page. - Derek R Bullamore (talk) 11:24, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
 * That is fine by me. Eric Schucht (talk) 17:45, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
 * ✅ - Derek R Bullamore (talk) 19:13, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

Could use some advice...
Hey Eric Schucht!

I've seen your name and your awesome work around a good deal, especially on newspaper articles, and was hoping you'd be willing to give some advice on expanding newspaper articles, especially their history.

So, I came across your edit at The Olympian - - about the 2024 print decrease (you beat me to it!) - and I've been loathe to use sources that report on themselves because over at many of the WP's regarding sourcing, self-reporting isn't great. However, as you obviously know, newspapers are gonna have to report on themselves (well, outside of FoxNews and CNN constantly "reporting" how much the other sucks).

I've been wanting to expand on the historical background of The Chronicle (Centralia, Washington) - it's absorbing/buying up competition, the early newspaper history in the city - and have gathered limited sources over the years so far. Unfortunately, only in-depth reporting comes from itself (there's some from extinct newspapers in Chehalis, Washington). Could not find anything definitive in consensus discussions, so based on your expertise, is there leeway here I can be comfortable with regarding self-reporting from The Chronicle?

I'm not in any great rush to work on that Chronicle history, but my thanks if you can provide some guidance before when I think I'm ready. Again, awesome work over 17,000 edits. A bit jealous!

Shortiefourten (talk) 17:58, 24 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Hmmm, well no one has ever scolded me for using newspapers as sources on themselves. Even the page on The New York Times uses self-reported sources. You just gotta use your own judgment, I think. Otherwise most wiki pages on newspapers would be blank because they're too small for any other media outlet to care about.
 * As for sources on The Chronicle, I suggest looking through the paper's digital archive on newspapers.com. The other option is to try finding a local history book focusing on Lewis County. Google Books might be a good place to check for old stuff in the public domain. Eric Schucht (talk) 23:54, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Eric,
 * Yeah, my logical assessment as well, but man, can some editors be sticklers, though, which is why I wanted to reach out first to someone with the experience before I made a move. I do have some books set aside as well as some newpaperarchive.com stuff, but the good stuff is directly from The Chronicle. But I'll keep looking. Maybe by the summer, after I finish some other works here, I'll be ready to go.
 * Thanks for the link and for giving me some feedback! No doubt I'll see your name pop-up and I know it'll be great work, like usual. Again, jealous.
 * Shortiefourten (talk) 15:03, 25 April 2024 (UTC)

May 2024
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from News-Times (Newport) into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g.,. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted copied template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia. In the future, please make sure to use the merged-to and merged-from templates on the relevant talk pages to make it easier to track the contribution histories.  Sounder  Bruce  23:08, 14 May 2024 (UTC)

CS1 error on List of newspapers in Florida
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page List of newspapers in Florida, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:Qwerfjkl/Botpreload&editintro=User:Qwerfjkl/boteditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:Qwerfjkl&preloadtitle=Qwerfjkl%20(bot)%20–%20Eric_Schucht&section=new&preloadparams%5b%5d=&preloadparams%5b%5d=1224867343 report it to my operator]. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 23:38, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
 * A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ([//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_newspapers_in_Florida&action=edit&minor=minor&summary=Fixing+reference+error+raised+by+%5B%5BUser%3AQwerfjkl%20(bot)%7CQwerfjkl%20(bot)%5D%5D Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:Qwerfjkl%20(bot)/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F1224867343%7CList%20of%20newspapers%20in%20Florida%5D%5D Ask for help])

Thoughts on circulation, notability, and reliable sources
Hi, Eric! You look like just the person I need to consult. (Unrelated: I see you once worked for the Everett Herald, my family lived in Anacortes for 50 years.) I have two questions, one narrow, one broad. Answers to these questions might be helpful to you as well in overcoming objections: Narrow question: I see that you regularly edit List of newspapers in Texas, and that the principal source for this list is the Texas Newspaper Directory. There is a column for circulation for each of those papers, and I'm wondering whether it should be changed to indicate "Print circulation." Here's why: I followed the link to their publication, downloaded and reviewed it. I noticed that for each entry, below the titles and founding dates, there are five blocks of data, the fourth of which is for publication days, page size, column width, and circulation. I'm living in El Paso, so I checked the entry for the El Paso Times. (In a minute you'll see what I'm getting at.) Now, I have a couple of lists that show that in 2023, the El Paso Times was the sixth leading newspaper by circulation in Texas. About themselves, the El Paso Times says the following: Circulation: 35,023 daily; 117,715 Sunday The El Paso Times has proudly served far West Texas and southern New Mexico residents since 1881. The El Paso Times is read daily by about 180,400 people and provides the most comprehensive news coverage of El Paso County. The TND reports the EPT's circulation at 9,625, 72.5 percent less than the daily figure reported by the newspaper at their website, 92 percent less than the Sunday edition. It looks like TND is reporting print specifically and not digital circulation. The WP entry for the El Paso Times follows suit, citing the circulation figure from the TND. The actual circulation is relevant to my second question, which is whether, at the levels of circulation claimed by the El Paso Times, this newspaper, or any others in the Paso del Norte region, such as El Diario in Ciudad Juarez, meet requirements for reliable sources in WP:NEWSORG,WP:SOURCE, and WP:SOURCES; and specifically in respect of reporting on organizations, whether their reports meet the requirements of WP:AUD. I have my own opinion, but would like to hear yours. WilliamEHillis (talk) 00:36, 3 June 2024 (UTC)


 * Hi William,
 * Narrow Answer: I think the circulation numbers in the Texas Newspaper Directory includes both print and digital subscriptions. If you look at the circulation number for The Dallas Morning News in the TND, it appears to be the total number. You can check by looking at the newspaper's Wiki page at the circulation numbers listed in the infobox. Those numbers come from the company's annual 10-K filing to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. I trust them to be correct as I assume it's a crime to lie or misrepresent numbers on a government form.
 * As for those circulation numbers you have for the El Paso Times, I assume you go them from this webpage. I have no idea what year those number are from. They could be a decade old for all I know. TND is dated and I assume they either get their circulation numbers from the paper's themselves, an auditing service like Audit Bureau of Circulations (UK) or from the post office via the Statement of Ownership, which you can do a FOIA request for if you want a copy. The point is I trust the TND numbers more than the paper's self-reported numbers that are undated and unsourced.
 * Broad Answer: Circulation size doesn't matter when it comes to whether or not a newspaper is a reliable source. I advise you to read the essay WikiProject Newspapers/Notability from WikiProject Newspapers. It can answer this question better than I can.  Eric Schucht (talk) 22:06, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Thank you, Eric! Your reply has been very helpful.
 * friendly regards, William
 * WilliamEHillis (talk) 01:56, 6 June 2024 (UTC)

Good job on The Advertiser News
Hi - just wanted to say thanks for your changes on The Advertiser News - just a couple hours after I put a template on the article you cleaned it all up and put fresh sources on there. Good work! BugGhost 🪲👻 09:18, 11 June 2024 (UTC)


 * No problem! Turns out there were two of the same page: The Advertiser News and Advertiser News. So I just merged the sources over from the latter and turned it into a redirect. Funny that there was duplicate articles for like a decade and no one ever noticed. Eric Schucht (talk) 11:57, 11 June 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 9
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited McKenzie River Reflections, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page KLCC.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:13, 9 July 2024 (UTC)