User talk:Eric Yurken

Wikipedia editor, math equations
I need help finding a good Wikipedia editor for math equations; would appreciate some pointers.
 * Try asking here. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 17:20, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks!--Eric Yurken (talk) 19:23, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

Carl Lindgren
Dear Eric:

I was hoping to find your personal e-mail or Wikipedia e-mail. Alas no luck. This information is concerning any potential nobility my entry would have. I am sending you this, no so you may change your mind, but that you may be abreast of the entire situation. I did note that some of the links were incorrect and if it is to stay should be corrected.

My only notable aspect, if there be any, is that since the creation of Annam (Chinese province) and later the Annam (French protectorate) I am the first and only Occidental to ever be appointed and occupy the position of Chancellor by the Nguyễn Dynasty for the Order of the Dragon of Annam. Because of this, the son of the late Emperor Bao Dai, Crown Prince Bao Long gave me the title of Hau (European Marquis) and the Collar of the Order of the Dragon. Because of this position, I have received numerous other awards (knighthoods) listed in Wikipedia. Noted under Carl Edwin Lindgren.

I am also one of only a few specialists in Metagogiek.

Regarding academies, although I have membership in numerous royal societies the only one of notability is the World Academy of Art and Science which states: "Distinction or accomplishment in one’s profession. A candidate should be a person who would qualify for membership in a national academy of his or her field."

Thank you and I wish you the best. You and I have similar interests.

Royalhistorian (talk) 08:08, 14 December 2008 (UTC)

Re: Denis Rancourt
You were right about my erroneously considering at least one Google Scholar hits as a false positive for this person. I was going to correct myself, but the discussion was already closed. I guess this was a snowball keep. Best regards.--Eric Yurken (talk) 03:07, 20 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Thanks for responding, Eric. I always worry with subjects that I don't understand at all in case I'm missing something really obvious. I wasn't sure why Neuro closed the AfD early, as it didn't seem an obvious snowball to me, but I'm not going to complain as it was the result I believe to be correct in this case. Regards, Espresso Addict (talk) 03:17, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Ludwig Carl Christian Koch
You might want to take another look at the afd, and redo your WorldCat search. Don't count on full names being used there. DGG (talk) 20:24, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
 * I did, and also checked other sources. As you probably noticed, I changed my vote to a keep. Thanks.--Eric Yurken (talk) 16:13, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

From user Inhocsignovinces
Dear Eric,

I am neither familiar with (nor do I care to be) up to snuff on the rules of, "Wikihoaxia" as anyone with a knowledge of how it works lends it very little credence at all as any adolescent can get on here and present him/herself as some self proclaimed expert in any field. That being said you did in fact put your two cents in regarding titles/orders (and the validity of such) on several occassion's and I would like to know exactly where your knowledge of the same stems from as you are obviously clueless. And judging by your past posts your, "expertise" has little or nothing to do with the same. So I find it offensive for one of your stature to, "sound off" about that which you have no knowledge of (much like many of the idiots on here) that gets some sense of, "self-importance" to deny the recognition of someone who does buy into this nonsense but is yet on the same hand quite, "notable" as you folks tend to label it. The whole gist of, "Wikihoaxia" needing donations should give one a glimmer of the fact that it is nothing more than a money machine for its inventor and allows one some sense of self-import by allowing said individual to, "edit" someone else's post. I find you to have been tried, weighed and found guilty of the same and simply another useless source of information that you claim to have been in the position to hold court over outside of your field. I would suggest you, "reign in" on those subjects that you have a clue about and remain silent on those to which you do not. If I have offended you in any way, please note that was most certainly my intent and perhaps it will make you think twice before running your mouth or adding your uninformed opinion on this piece of garbage again. If you would like to debate or rebutt what I have posted here please feel free to contact me at fornax@oh.rr.com. Have a good holiday. Cheers! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Inhocsignovinces (talk • contribs) 06:17, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

Perspective
The explanatory comments at Articles for deletion/Joshua Greenberg were useful for me.

Pondering the array of views in this thread helped me to step back only slightly; but even small movements do evoke a changed perspective, a new appreciation of our focal point. --Tenmei (talk) 16:22, 6 October 2009 (UTC)


 * In my opinion, the AfD thread resulted in an improved article. Let me take this opportunity to acknowledge your contribution specifically.  Undoubtedly, your participation in this thread caused me to re-examine an imperfect understanding of what WP:Notability and WP:PROF require.  Thank you. --Tenmei (talk) 18:19, 10 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Thank you for the note. All the best,--Eric Yurken (talk) 22:16, 10 October 2009 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:55, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Broadcom Corporation and/or Broadcom Limited
I noticed you have contributed to articles on Broadcom Corporation and/or Broadcom Limited. Just a quick note that there is a discussion here about whether or not Broadcom should be a disambiguation page or refer solely to Broadcom Corporation. Cheers! Talk to SageGreenRider 17:48, 17 February 2016 (UTC)

Broadcom (disambiguation) AfD?
Greetings! I noticed that you've contributed to articles on Broadcom Corporation, Avago Technology, and/or the new merged entity Broadcom Limited in the past. I'm pinging you to see if you wanted to add an opinion to a deletion debate on a disambiguation page (Broadcom (disambiguation)). If so, the debate is here. Thanks! Talk to SageGreenRider 23:32, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 28 November 2023 (UTC)