User talk:Ericaw5/sandbox

Mitchell Floyd peer review

I am reviewing Erica Wilson's article. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Ericaw5/sandbox

The main improvement this article could use is clarification on where the intended edits are supposed to go. The article cites two articles, French Algeria and the Algerian War, but doesn't cite where it is supposed to fit in. Is it meant to be added to an existing section in one of those two articles or is it supposed to be an entirely new article.

The article is largely well written, and there is some clear organization in the form of subheadings, but it is unclear where it is supposed to fit in. One area that could use some additions would be the outcome of independence section, such as the line regarding the affect of the Algerian War on the relationship between the French government and religion.

For citations, the proposed edits reference to academic sources but many of them are inaccessible without access to the Cal library system, which might pose a problem. The article could also improve by replacing the in text citations, though this would probably be done in the follow up edits.

For media, the article does not use images but if the proposed passaged are meant to be incoporated into a large existing article, then perhaps there are already sufficient images.

Overall, this article could use improvements in organization and the use of citations. The passages are largely well written and sourced, and if there's a better idea of where the edits fit in, that would greatly increase its effectiveness.

I apologize for the delay and have finished the peer review on time (April 4th)and made my notes on this page courtesy of the African Politics edu page. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Ericaw5/African_Independence_Movements/Imwesley_Peer_Review Imwesley (talk) 18:06, 7 April 2020 (UTC)