User talk:Ericbank

Welcome!

Hello, Ericbank, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Domain Developers Fund, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Wuh Wuz  Dat  05:36, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Domain Developers Fund


A tag has been placed on Domain Developers Fund, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Wuh Wuz  Dat  05:36, 29 November 2010 (UTC)

Advertising, Notability and Conflict of Interest
Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a business listing directory; we do not expect to have articles for every company, and we are continually fending off attempts to use us as a free advertising platform. Among the requirements for entry are, (a) not to be unduly promotional and (b) to be notable, which is not a matter of opinion but must be demonstrated by showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." Significant means more than just listing-type mentions; reliable excludes Myspace, Facebook, blogs, places where anyone can post anything; independent excludes the subject's own website, affiliated ones and anything based on press releases. The test is, have other people, independent of the subject, thought it interesting and important enough to write about?

Looking at the deletion log, I see that Domain Developers Fund was actually deleted (not by me) as an advertisement. In fact, it does not seem to me unduly promotional, but I doubt that it meets the notability standard - the first two references seem to be based on a press release, the third is a listing, and the fourth is the fund's own site. (I was puzzled why you came to me, but I see now: when you moved the article from your user space into the main encyclopedia, it left behind a redirect, and that was what I deleted.)

Among Wikipedia's 3 million articles, there are many that are not up to standard, but we do not accept that as a reason for allowing more, so What about article X? is not an argument that is accepted.

Read the WP:FAQ/Organizations and WP:Notability (organizations and companies). Also, if you are connected with the Fund, read WP:Conflict of interest and WP:Best practices for editors with conflicts of interest. Then, if you wish, approach, the admin who actually deleted the article; if s/he does not agree, there is WP:Deletion review. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 12:46, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

Domain Developers Fund
I don't want to mislead you, I think it is borderline - the fact that this is the first such fund scores highly for notability, but some will see it as promotional.

You can move if you want, or if you aren't sure what to do, let me know, and I'll move it. I'll remove the unreviewed template.-- SPhilbrick  T  00:33, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

By the way, does the fund have an established beta yet? My guess is that it will be low, but not as low as some of the cat bond funds. However, it may be too early to measure. If is exists and is low, it might be worth adding some info on diversification and how this is an attractive asset class.-- SPhilbrick  T  00:38, 10 December 2010 (UTC)