User talk:Ericbobbie226

March 2019
Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to J Hus. Thank you. Scorbunny (talk) 00:07, 13 March 2019 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on J Hus. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Scorbunny (talk) 01:18, 13 March 2019 (UTC)

Content is sourced. References are made in the artists music and songwriting credits. Ericbobbie226 (talk) 01:27, 13 March 2019 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Kojo Funds. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 03:41, 13 March 2019 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 36 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   04:04, 13 March 2019 (UTC)

Birth records
Do birth records online count as reliable sources? Ericbobbie226 (talk) 17:30, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
 * No. Such public records shold not be used on Wikipedia. See WP:BLPPRIMARY. Huon (talk) 18:44, 13 March 2019 (UTC)

Legitimacy
Even if they clearly hold more validation than articles ? Why not? Ericbobbie226 (talk) 19:58, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
 * One reason is that a birth record merely states that someone was born - there's not enough context to prove that the person born is indeed the subject of the Wikipedia article. There are privacy concerns, too. Huon (talk) 04:11, 14 March 2019 (UTC)

March 2019
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Ramz (rapper). Equine-man (talk) 01:15, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Not3s. Equine-man (talk) 01:21, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Krept and Konan. SKay (talk) 09:32, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Chip (rapper), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. SKay (talk) 09:36, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

Please do not attack other editors. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. SKay (talk) 12:34, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

Edits made to Chip (rapper)
Hello, I noticed that you recently removed content from this article without making any attempt to explain why. In the future, it is necessary that you explain your reasoning to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. I also noticed that you made a comment that didn't seem very civil in your edit summary. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. Simply typing "Fuck you" does nothing to build on our encyclopedia, and shows bad faith as an editor. Please keep this in mind in the future. SKay (talk) 12:54, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

March 2019
Hello, I'm Breawycker. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person   on J Hus, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Breawycker (talk to me!) 00:14, 27 March 2019 (UTC)

April 2019
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Nipsey Hussle, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you.  General Ization Talk  00:03, 1 April 2019 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Nipsey Hussle.  General Ization Talk  00:03, 1 April 2019 (UTC)


 * The section on his shooting should not be a part of the "Personal life" section at this point; it may ultimately evolve into a section on his death. I have moved it toa separate section.  If you continue to revert, you will be blocked from editing.  General Ization  Talk  00:09, 1 April 2019 (UTC)

Vandalism
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Nipsey Hussle. Ericbobbie Talk 00:03, 1 April 2019 (UTC) Ericbobbie226 (talk) 00:07, 1 April 2019 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for violations of Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Materialscientist (talk) 00:10, 1 April 2019 (UTC)

Nipsey
The section on his shooting remains a part of the "Personal life" section at this point; unless his death is confirmed. I have moved it toa separate section. If you continue to revert, you will be blocked from editing. Ericbobbie Talk 00:09, 1 April 2019 (UTC) Ericbobbie226 (talk) 00:11, 1 April 2019 (UTC)