User talk:Ericketts7184/sandbox

Urshela's Peer Review
The information that you added to the "Plot Summary," "Development," and "Critical Views" sections is very detailed and gives a solid overview of the topic. Per Wikipedia guidelines, you present a neutral discussion that is balanced, unbiased, and provides credible sources to support the information. I agree with your preliminary assessment that the "Critical Views" section needed more critics added to the discussion. The critical sources that you have added make the discussion more substantial and adds more credibility to the information. I also like the way you integrate direct quotes within each section to give even more substantiation to the information. The "Plot Summary" section is particularly detailed and gives the reader a clear textual survey. The only improvement that I can suggest is minor. You might want to consider linking more section information with other Wikipedia articles that are related to yours. For example, in the "Development" section, you might want to add a link to "Neoclassic" and the "Romantic Era" terms, so readers can jump to these respective Wikipedia pages for additional information. However, again this is an optional improvement, and overall your additions are well done.

Uatkins (talk) 00:16, 24 November 2017 (UTC)