User talk:Ericwirtanen

Hey Eric, just wanted to say hi, and welcome, remember me from NHC? Anyway hope to see you more around here. -- Will Mak  050389  16:13, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Nohomers.png
Thanks for uploading File:Nohomers.png, which you've sourced to http://www.nohomers.net. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  Ron h jones (Talk) 00:46, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of The No Homers Club


A tag has been placed on The No Homers Club, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate,. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here.  Taylor Trescott  - my talk + my edits 21:35, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

It appears from your username that you appear to be the owner of the site. This means you should probably stay away from editing the page, as you may have a conflict of interest. The site looks nice, but it does not appear to be notable. I suggest creating a draft in your userspace before moving it to main.  Taylor Trescott  - my talk + my edits 21:50, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

"No Homers" under any title
Hey Eric. Per the tagging noted in the message you received directly above, I saw you recreated, which was recently deleted after an Articles for Deletion discussion at Articles for deletion/NoHomers.net (2nd nomination), at the new title. The issue is that once consensus has been reached to delete a page after discussion, it cannot be recreated with the same or similar content that does not address the deletion basis. In practice here, this means that any page on the same topic (by any title) would have to show notability by citation to reliable, secondary sources entirely unconnected to the topic that substantively discuss it. I saw that you had spent a good deal of time doing tasks such as adding links to the page in others articles, creating redirects and uploading images, and I wanted to alert you to these issues because it's a shame when anyone's precious time is spent on matters that have little chance of not being undone. This does not mean that Wikipedia can't ever have an article on Nohomers.net/The No Homers Club, but it does mean that simply recreating the article without citation to the necessary sources to address the deletion is not going to work, and because it appears people looked for sources that would meet notability requirements and came up short, it's likely that no article on this topic will be possible at least right now. Best regards--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 22:31, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Hey again Eric. I've left you a message on my talk page in much more detail. Please see there, but in short, I've userfied the content to User:Ericwirtanen/The No Homers Club where you can work on it.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 16:48, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:Ericwirtanen/The No Homers Club
User:Ericwirtanen/The No Homers Club, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Ericwirtanen/The No Homers Club and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of User:Ericwirtanen/The No Homers Club during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 22:05, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:42, 23 November 2015 (UTC)