User talk:Erik4j

Proposed deletion of Raul Escribano


The article Raul Escribano has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp/dated tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. red dogsix (talk) 04:42, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

November 2016
Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you may have added public domain content to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as Raul Escribano. You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Plagiarism, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:31, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

Information about Confllct of interest editing
Hello, Erik4j. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about in the article Raul Escribano, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:


 * avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
 * instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the request edit template);
 * when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
 * avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
 * exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 02:20, 1 December 2016 (UTC)


 * Hi Erik4j. The above post contains various links to policy/guideline pages where you can find more information on conflict of interest editing. Please take some time to read through them because knowing what kinds of edits are generally considered acceptable for COI editors to make might help you avoid problems with other editors. -- Marchjuly (talk) 02:23, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

Fellow Airman
Hello, I'm an AF E-6 and also an admininstrator on Wikipedia. I can help you explain to the BG why asking you to edit Wikipedia is a bad idea. Click here and send me an email which I'll reply to with my .mil address and we can chat about this.--v/r - TP 19:26, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Hi Erik4j. I think it might be a good idea for you to contact . He is not only a fellow member of the military, but he is also a Wikipedia administrator and he can fill you in on the dos and donts of COI editing. You probably should also take a look at Wikipedia:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide and familiarize yourself with the types of edits generally considered acceptable by the community for you to make to the Escribano article. It's important for you to try and edit in accordance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines and not how you think would please your boss. There are other editors watching the article now and although they might be sympathetic to your situation, they will also make sure nothing (good or bad) which is not in accordance with relevant policies and guidelines is added/removed from the article. I recommend that you try to engage these editors on the article's talk page and discuss any changes that you would like to make which are not minor edits (as defined by Wikipedia) or are not clear violations of Wikipedia's policy on biographies of living persons. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:40, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks Marchjuly. We're in contact now and I've been sharing bits about WP policy on the subject and the best way to go about proposing changes.--v/r - TP 02:15, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks . Maybe you can also help explain the differences between Wikipedia and Commons to Erik4j. He uploaded some images to Commons as "own work", but they really aren't. They are probably OK as c:Template:PD-USGov-Military-Army, but Erik4j should try to provide as much info as he can about the respective sources of these photos. -- Marchjuly (talk) 02:33, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Will do.--v/r - TP 05:47, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

Maintenance template removal
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Raul Escribano. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:22, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Hi Erik4j. Maintenance templates are often added to articles to let other editors know about a particular problems which needs addressing. They templates often add articles to special list pages which are often checked by editors who clean up these types of things. It generally not a good idea to remove such a template without explaining why in an edit sum or on the article's talk page. Templates like this are especially important in articles about living persons because any article content deemed controversial and unsupported can be removed by any editor. Please refer to Help:Maintenance template removal for more information on removing these templates. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:30, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Raul Escribano for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Raul Escribano is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Raul Escribano until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Coretheapple (talk) 00:09, 15 December 2016 (UTC)