User talk:ErikTheBikeMan/archive2

Sid Bernstein Photo
–I got the photo from this site(http://www.bagism.com/library/nyc-stamp-ceremony.html), and am not sure if it's fair use or not. If you could help me find a better photo it would be appreciated, as I'm not sure where to find fair use photos. Thank you. Drsmoo (talk) 03:00, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

-Trying very hard to get a photo for this page, asking alot of sources, I asked on guy, and he approved, but the image was deleted first, now he's not responding. If you can help find photos, and help build up the page through the regular channels it would be very greatly appreciated. AS your help up to this point has been greatly appreciated. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.113.157.160 (talk) 02:11, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

Reply
To do a good GA review you should:


 * Always state your concerns clearly, with links to the appropriate policy pages (eg. This article has many citations, but few are reliable. See WP:RS for more information.
 * You state what criteria is meets (Good article criteria
 * You check references carefully to ensure reliability.
 * You compare it to similar articles.

I'm about to review a good article so if it helps i will give you info on what i am doing and why as i do it.

Now onto featured articles, to be honest I've never done an FA review but if you give me a day or so I will research it and come back to you with an answer.

Thanks,

Anonymous101 (talk) 19:47, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

Tokyo Tower
Did you post a GA review someplace? I didn't see one. Jclemens (talk) 02:49, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks for taking the time to review the article, but you didn't really review it well or give me a chance to rectify any of the problems you had with it to try to get it to GA. It was almost as if you quick-failed it, which I do not think is appropriate. --TorsodogTalk 13:42, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Ah, no problem. I'd just like a couple of specific reasons why you failed it so I can fix them for you. For example, which paragraph are you referring to that needs sources? Also, what kind of extra construction/history are you looking for? I know it is a bit short when compared to the facilities section, but I do think that it hits all of the major aspects and answers most questions anyone would have about the structure's construction and history. (I think the major problem might be that the facilities section is too bloated). --TorsodogTalk 21:47, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

Reply
It doesn't seem to show up as a red link for me. Anonymous101 (talk) 07:30, 5 October 2008 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXI (September 2008)
The September 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:31, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

Minneapolis Meetups
Town Hall Brewery maps.google.com 1430 Washington Ave S Minneapolis, MN 55454 (612) 339-8696 October 11, 2008 Saturday at 12:00 noon (midday) Meetup RSVP

Muddy Waters maps.google.com 2401 Lyndale Ave S Minneapolis, MN 55405 (612) 872-2232 October 10, 2008 Friday at 10:00 PM (at night) Alternate meetup RSVP

Hope you can make it. Feel free to pass along these invitations. -SusanLesch (talk) 16:02, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

Changes on the Jack Chanin page
Dear ErikTheBikeMan,

I am writing in reference to the Jack Chanin biography page.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jack_Chanin

I write you because, I am new to Wiki too, so I want to do this right. You made two changes that I think should be reverted back.

Your two changes consisted of:

1) removing the Ukrainian Magicans Category.

Mr. Chanin was born and raised in the Ukraine, and was a prominent magician in the Ukraine. Therefore, he deserves to be categorized there as well.

2) you changed the title from Books and Media about to references.

Both items listed in that section are pieces of Media about Mr. Chanin's life. While 'Books and Media about' might not be the right way to list it, I'm 100% positive the word 'references' is not the right word we're looking to use. In my opinion, 'Books and media about' is a better choice.

I am going to revert the article back, unless you wholeheartedly disagree.

Thank you for your time in advance.

Leeasher (talk) 17:04, 8 October 2008 (UTC)(talk)

AFD of Femida Bilasuvar
Not sure if you noticed that Twinkle never created Articles for deletion/Femida Bilasuvar. Could you please either create the page or remove the tag and the link on the AFD page. Thanks, MrKIA11 (talk) 22:03, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 20:36, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion
I notice that you tagged the page Maximum Wage (Music Video) for speedy deletion with the reason "an article about a real person, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content that does not indicate the importance or significance of the subject". While that's a valid reason for speedy deletion in general, this page does not qualify for speedy deletion under that criterion because it is not an article about any of those; it is an article about a music video. If you still want the page to be deleted, please consider tagging it with a speedy deletion template which does apply, redirecting it to another page, or using the WP:PROD process. Thanks! Stifle (talk) 10:01, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

Proposed Deletion
You proposed that the page Maximum Wage (Music Video) should be deleted on the grounds that it is not a notable topic. I am the creator of said page, and I am trying to figure out what criteria you are basing that judgement on. It seems notable to me. It has been added to IMDB, shown in two San Francisco bay area film festivals, and has generated a lot of attention on Youtube. Please specify what in particular you believe needs to be changed in order to make this a viable wiki article. Rycer (talk) 21:28, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

Second Battle of Corbridge
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Second Battle of Corbridge, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.ipedia.net/information/battles+of+Corbridge. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 02:01, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

Kuru_(shoe_company)
Hiya, on your proposed deletion: How many references must one have before submitting an article on a topic? Forgive me, but I'm new to this. In addition, assertions of notability seem somewhat subjective. Are you saying that the fact that someone wanted to create (or even 'note') an article isn't reason enough to assert the topic notable...? In other words, how many people need to note something for it to be notable? Thanks! Steve.null (talk) 22:24, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

Hrmmm... just read thru the deletion article that explains this; I understand the nomination. Basically, the only reason i wanted to create the article was to update the disambiguity page of the Kuru. I don't really care of this article is here but since there was no info, I started an article. Would it be better just to update the ambiguity page and wait until it's notable enough for a full-fledged article? Thanks. Steve.null (talk) 22:40, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

CWii's RfA
Just to let you know, I reversed your !vote on CWii's RfA. He had withdrawn before your !vote and there is no need to rub salt into a failed rfa.--- Balloonman  PoppaBalloon 16:03, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

Re
Just in case you didn't see, your Template Problems have been fixed (but not by me). Anonymous101 (talk) 15:58, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

My assessment drive
Hi, I have started to assess the articles in the Norse history and culture project, and the articles A to E are now finished. If you feel that I have wrongly assessed any of them, don't hesitate to change the assessment.--Berig (talk) 09:17, 9 November 2008 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXII (October 2008)
The October 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:52, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

Assessment
Thanks for assessing so many articles. I just ask you to heed that in Scandinavian studies, things Icelandic are not necessarily considered more important than things Swedish.--Berig (talk) 14:40, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

I think the articles on more general Germanic topics only belong if there aren't specific Norse articles already covering the same subjects in more detail. Germanic peoples does not belong because whe have articles like Norsemen and Vikings, and likewise an article like Germanic paganism doesn't belong since we have Norse mythology and Norse paganism. However, Germanic chieftain is within the scope since there's no "Norse chieftain" article, and Germanic monarchy belongs since there is no article "Norse monarchy" (and none should be needed). I do think Germania (book) is very much within the scope of the project since it is usually referred to in Scandinavian history books.--Berig (talk) 10:27, 15 November 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for November 17, 2008 and before.
Because the Signpost hasn't been sent in a while, to save space, I've condensed all seven issues that were not sent into this archive. Only the three issues from November are below.

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 10:48, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXIII (November 2008)
The November 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 16:22, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

Assessment
You could ask several established editorrs with an interest in Old Norse culture.--Berig (talk) 08:21, 14 December 2008 (UTC)

Reply
Yes, to move images to commons you find the image you want to move and then use CommonsHelper to transfer the image. Does this make sense? if not, please ask me. Anonymous101 (talk) 15:49, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

DYK nom page
Hello! there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! --Rosiestep (talk) 23:25, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

Help
Dear Erick,

Can you please leave some pointers as to how not to have my wikipedia page deleted. I', very new in this and am not sure how to have my page not deleted. I'm still trying to grasp on the whole wiki concept. Pls advise. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ribboners (talk • contribs) 03:31, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

Hello my name is max
Hello, my name is max and i made a new wikipedia article 'Taeyeon' today,

but it is considered for deletion because it is a 'non-notable person.'

Can I protest, because I genuinely think that Taeyeon is a celebrity worth having a wikipedia page devoted to her name.

if you search Taeyeon on google, it yields 277,000 results, which i think is a considerable amount, considering she never debuted in english-speaking countries.

please preserve Taeyeon's wikipedia entry,

thanks

Max

Werogatda (talk) 05:31, 21 December 2008 (UTC)

Deletion review
I have posted a question at Deletion review which you may be able to answer. Can you please return to that discussion to answer it? Stifle (talk) 10:31, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

Hello! there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath and respond there as soon as possible.

geo-stubs
Hi Erik - just a quick heads up that you're going about things slightly the wrong way with geo-stubs. I note that, for instance, with Suong, Cambodia you added cambodia-stub and geo-stub, then added Category:Cambodia geography stubs by hand. What you would have been better off doing was simply adding Cambodia-geo-stub (which automatically adds the category). All countries have their own geo-stub types (geo-stub is only for things which don't have a specific country, like List of past presumed highest mountains). Cheers, and keep up the stub-sorting work :) Grutness...wha?  01:32, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

Help
Hi, is there any way to see only the articles that are in two categories, such as All articles lacking sources and People in Norse Mythology? Thanks ErikTheBikeMan (talk) 15:23, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Lacking sources:
 * This has a lot of the norse mythology:
 * Hopefully that helps, if you need anything else, post here and I will try to help you. -- Terrillja talk  15:38, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

Unref tag
Hi Erik. I suggest that you don't add unref tags to articles that give their sources. Herrauðr clearly tells from which primary sources the information is taken.--Berig (talk) 20:08, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

Help
helpme

What is the Wiki markup for columns? Thanks, ErikTheBikeMan (talk) 23:23, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Do you mean tables? There is a collection of links at WP:tables. NuclearWarfare  contact me My work  23:25, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

320 mm
I undid your recent rollback, I assumed it was in error? Maury Markowitz (talk) 01:38, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

Hello
Thank you for your message. I had never submitted a DYK nomination before and I didn't realize you needed to repeat the article name within the hook. In any event, someone else was kind enough to correct my oversight. Happy New Year! LiteraryMaven (talk) 16:21, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

GA Review 320 mm mortar
I'm reviewing the article 320 mm mortar and I have a list of points to ponder posted here: Talk:320 mm mortar/GA1. I'm heading away from home until January 5th but I'll be leaving the GAR open... I don't believe in putting a review "on hold" when holding it open for a few days serves the same purpose. Cheers! Binksternet (talk) 05:30, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

==

North Sea
Hi, Erik, thanks for the offer to finish the GA review of North Sea, but I going to resume now. I found a lot of sourcing issues in the first pass and it's taken the editors a while to deal with them - and then, of course, there was Christmas. Best wishes --Philcha (talk) 10:12, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

Tagging problems
Hi Erik, when you find an article that lacks inline citations, but does indeed refer to sources (e.g. Hörgr), I suggest you do not add a tag because it is not accurate. There are other tags to add if you are unhappy with the referencing, like .--Berig (talk) 10:24, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with File:51TgbAN-nFL. SL500 AA240 .jpg
Thanks for uploading File:51TgbAN-nFL. SL500 AA240 .jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check


 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
 * That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 06:02, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

Re: Fair User Rationale Problems
Hi Erik. I can see is that the fair use rationale is linked to the disambiguation page, rather than the page the image is linked on. Once you fix that, the issue should be fixed. Cheers, –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  15:25, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

Bob Conley
I see you voted for Keep before my rationale for Merge was added, so perhaps you would consider changing your vote? Articles_for_deletion/Bob_Conley Flatterworld (talk) 16:38, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

Signpost updated for November 24, 2008 through January 3, 2009
Three issues have been published since the last deliver: November 24, December 1, and January 3.

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 21:42, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

DYK for IR-40
(manually credited after the new bot freaked out) --Dravecky (talk) 01:39, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

A note from the GACC

 * Notice delivery by xenobot  13:49, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXIV (December 2008)
The December 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:51, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

No problem
Thanks for the critical analysis.

--LIL T (talk) 23:10, 10 January 2009 (UTC)LIL T--LIL T (talk) 23:10, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia Signpost, January 10, 2009
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 20:00, 11 January 2009 (UTC)  §hepBot  ( Disable )  19:18, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Uncat
The reason I'm marking pages as "uncat" is to clear out the specialuncategorised pages as quickly as possible so we can get to pages further along in the alphabet. If I tried to categorise all of the 1000 pages, there's no way I could do it in time, since the bot updates the entries every three days, and that isn't enough time for me to categorise all 1000 of the entries. By marking the entries as "uncat" it means that, for example, the last entries, alphabetically, aren't "lost" when the bot updates the pages. T@nn (talk) 03:51, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Firstly, I don't know how to do that and besides, if it were that easy wouldn't someone else have done it by now? T@nn (talk) 04:04, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Okay, I stop the "uncatting" for now. T@nn (talk) 04:09, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

Talk:The Game (mind game)
Unhelpful comments such as the ones you left on this talk page are considered to be disruptive. OhNo itsJamie Talk 06:20, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia Signpost, January 17, 2009
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 21:12, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 23:32, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

Help
helpme

Could someone please explain how updates on transclusions work? On my user page, I have a chart of active RfAs, but I have to make an edit to the page to see updates.

Also, could someone please explain the job queue? I don't understand how it works. Thanks, ErikTheBikeMan (talk) 23:46, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Hi Erik. I think you are being caught by a caching issue. When you view a webpage your computer often takes a snapshot of the data and in order to save tasks and memory processing, when you visit the same page, it doesn't recheck all the data and rebuild the page, but instead uses the data from its stored short term memory—its cache. In order to make your computer rebuild the page you can bypass your cache (often as simply as clicking control+F5). When you make an edit, of course as part of that function, the page must be truly refreshed, so that's when you are seeing the template update as a side result. So clearing your cache is probably all you need to do. I don't know what you're referring to with respect to the job queue so I'll leave up the helpme template. Note that Wikipedia pages can also have internal caching issues--wikipedia servers holding old data in their caches. This too can be fixed. See WP:PURGE.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 23:57, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Hi! The job queue is a queue inside the software that runs Wikipedia (MediaWiki) that periodically updates stuff like turning red links into blue links when pages are created. By default, whenever someone views a page, one item is taken from the job queue, and dealt with. If you want a more detailed explaination, take a look at Job queue. :-)  Stwalkerster [  talk  ]  00:06, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion of Croydon Hurricanes
Hi mate. As a relatively new contributor to Wiki I'm still trying to get used to its protocols! That said, I'm struggling to see how Croydon Hurricanes was deleted on the grounds of lack of notability. The club has produced Super League players and has three current England internationals in its age groups. Menorcarl (talk) 09:19, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia Signpost, January 24, 2009
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 03:08, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

Delivered at 04:02, 25 January 2009 (UTC) by §hepBot  ( Disable ) 

Deletions
I'm removing edit summary and pagemove vandalism. NawlinWiki (talk) 05:09, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
 * As NawlinWiki said, it's to remove vandal edits (commonly page move vandalism) from article histories. Take this for example. The first log entry was the revision that was removed from the history page; and ...from there, the page is deleted and all of the revisions are subsequently restored except for that particular one. ~ Troy (talk) 05:40, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

Editor Review
Sure, I'll try to review you in the net day or so. Thanks, --Anonymous101 (talk) 12:33, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

Comments please!
Since you're the primary author of the 320mm article, would you mind commenting on the talk page? Maury Markowitz (talk) 15:19, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

U-41 GA review
I've added the ship name in the lead of the article. Was that the only outstanding issue in the review? — Bellhalla (talk) 21:45, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

Requests for adminship/Mayalld
The first two links were wrong, I changed them. I hope when you say "especially the second" you're not refering to the IP edits - those weren't Mayalld - I merely linked the wrong urls - the right ones are later on in the conversation. I had left them so the conversation flowed, I guess I ought to strike 'em. Cheers, Wily D 02:35, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

RegentsPark's RFA
Hi!

Thanks for participating in RegentsPark's RFA. I would like to know your opinion on this: How would you quantify AFD experience? When would you be sure that a person would have enough experience. Regards, =Nichalp   «Talk»=  07:58, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

Re: Reheated Cabbage
✅. I declined the CSD tag, as it had little or no validity. Cheers, –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  03:44, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

Was User:Kivar2 your sock?
Hi, I was going through the WP:O and found that Kivar2's talk page had been deleted. I noticed that the last edit before deletion was you redirecting his talk page to yours. Was he your alternate account? Should he be removed from the inactive list altogether? Puzzled,--Aervanath (talk) 18:40, 31 January 2009 (UTC) Yes, he was my public sock, though I havn't had reason to use him lately. I think that it might be better to create an account along the lines of "Erik's Public Sock" or something... ErikTheBikeMan (talk) 21:51, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Ok, I'll strike it from WP:O, then. No pointing in having you on the active list and you're sock on the inactive list. :) It doesn't matter what you call your sock, as long as you're upfront about it. Mine is User:Aervasock (you can see I've marked the user page as such), and I just make sure I tagged the user pages accordingly. I'm still not sure why Kivar2's talk page redirect to your page was deleted; out of curiosity I looked into Tikiwont's contrbutions around that time, and it seemed unrelated to what he was doing.  Do you want me to restore it?--Aervanath (talk) 01:56, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: I've copied this to your page, where the conversation started; no reason to split up the conversation, as I'm watching this page.--Aervanath (talk) 02:00, 1 February 2009 (UTC)''
 * Ok, I'll continue it here. I've added the same sock template that's on your sock's page to mine (switching the username parameter, of course). I've also redirected the talk page to mine (I did leave your message, though). ErikTheBikeMan (talk) 04:19, 1 February 2009 (UTC)