User talk:Erik Doble

Welcome!
Hello, Erik Doble, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as English National Ballet Artistic Director since 2012, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Kolbasz (talk) 09:28, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of English National Ballet Artistic Director since 2012


A tag has been placed on English National Ballet Artistic Director since 2012, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.
 * It appears to be a clear copyright infringement. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. However, even if you use one of these processes to release copyrighted material to Wikipedia, it still needs to comply with the other policies and guidelines to be eligible for inclusion. If you would like any assistance with this, you can ask a question at the help desk.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Kolbasz (talk) 09:28, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

Tamara Rojo
Your recent changes have been reverted. Please use neutral language and add references next time. Please read WP:NPOV and WP:BLP. And do not mark your edits as "minor", when they are not! Edwardx (talk) 12:28, 22 November 2016 (UTC)


 * Please respect the changes and if possible improve them. I am a close relative of Tamara Rojo and certify that all the information provided is accurate. Thank you.


 * Very sorry, but the Rojo article was already very extensive, and should really have been trimmed from its previous version, not further expanded. I don't have the time to sort out the mess your edits are making. We must have proper references - your certification doesn't cut it. And you have a conflict of interest. Please read Conflict of interest. Edwardx (talk) 13:32, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

In the edition that I have made and which you systematically erases without moral authority to do so, there is no conflict of interest whatsoever, since all I submit can be found in different public sources such as the English National Ballet page http: //www.ballet .org.uk / Tamara Rojo’s website etc. In fact, who seems to boycotting the update of Tamara Rojo is you by placing a photo where another person appears and erasing perfectly verifiable data. Tamara Rojo is not an entity, but a living artist who is entitled to her image, therefore I beg you to stop boycotting the entry of Tamara Rojo.

Conflict of interest
Hello, Erik Doble. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about in the article Tamara Rojo, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:


 * avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
 * instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the request edit template);
 * when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
 * avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
 * exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you.

In the edition that I have made of Tamara Rojo and which Edwardx systematically erases without moral authority to do so, there is no conflict of interest whatsoever, since all I submit can be found in different public sources such as the English National Ballet page http: //www.ballet .org.uk / Tamara Rojo’s website etc. In fact, who seems to boycotting the update of Tamara Rojo is Edwardx by placing a photo where another person appears and erasing perfectly verifiable data. Tamara Rojo is not an entity, but a living artist who is entitled to her image, therefore I beg whoever Edwardx to stop boycotting the entry Tamara Rojo.