User talk:Erik Le Mesurier

Vandalism alert
You have been paged because a user has reported a high level of vandalism and you are listed as a contact.

Recovery of Article & Absolute Vandalism by WP:ADMIN's Chzz, Sowhy, Slon02
To Wikipedians & WP:Admin's, I appealed for Peer Review for my article few time back. In the name of Peer Review, one of our WP: Admin - Chzz has vandalized the TNPL article. He has cut short the complete article without properly going through the entire article. In few places there are copy right violation which i have checked & corrected after his advice. But complete article has been cut short to one paragraph without properly analyzing the contents. ''Pls Take action / provide your assistance for the above subject. Thank you!'' Raj6644 (talk) 11:56, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) TNPL is subsidy of Govt of Tamilnadu. So in Govt of Tamilnadu's website, information about TNPL has been displayed for the information of public. Pls read Disclaimer information at Govt of Tamilnadu's website. Under Right To Information Act 2005, the government website is liable to display information to the public & also the website it is not holding any copyrights.
 * WP: Admin - Chzz has read & matched TNPL article contents with TNPL website contents & he has tagged the article as Copyright violation without Checking Govt of Tamilnadu's website.
 * 1) Also he has deleted Criticism / Controversy Section which has reliable reference document (Public Hearing Proceedings) from Tamil nadu Pollution control Board. To maintain transparency,normally Public Hearing Proceedings are published for Public information.Criticism / Controversy Section has information from Public Hearing Proceedings & also from Newspaper information (the Hindu).
 * WP: Admin - Chzz doesn't care about the effort behind the work. Being an administrator it's easy to delete entire contents of the article instead of helping to improve the article.
 * 1) The article has nearly 25 references, i request WP:ADMIN's to cross check & punish me if references are wrong. If references are not enough for the article Chzz would have asked the user's / me to add more references instead of discarding all the contents.
 * 2) Contributors to Wikipedia are normally volunteers, if admin's using their power discourage user instead to extending assistance has demoralizing effect on New User's.
 * 3) Apart from Deleting contents of the article, downgrading article rating none of the Admins (Chzz,Sowhy,Slon02) made any sort of constructive edits like adding References, correcting grammatical mistakes,etc.

''This is an automatically generated message. If problems occur, please contact User:nathanww''.

Vandalism alert
You have been paged because a user has reported a high level of vandalism and you are listed as a contact.

''This is an automatically generated message. If problems occur, please contact User:nathanww''.