User talk:Erik the Swed

Talk page guidelines
You do not have the right to add your comments within the context of mine on a talk page. Your latest addition is a violation of Wikipedia policy, "Generally, do not alter others' comments, including signatures.", "Never edit or move someone's comment to change its meaning, even on your own talk page". Your additions into what I have posted is a clear violation. --Kansas Bear (talk) 01:19, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

Cute, I was actually cleaning up the text and format it correctly, you do not have a very productive attitude about talk sections and resort to threats as I will assume the IP address comment is intended to be a IRL threat implication. Erik the Swed (talk) 01:27, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

Edit warring on Huns talk page
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount and can lead to a block, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. This includes your IP. --Kansas Bear (talk) 01:20, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Guidlines are clear, you can't bully people off comment pages, expecially when they have made a good faith effort to maintain order and the information they post is both relevant and sources.Erik the Swed (talk) 01:27, 4 February 2015 (UTC)