User talk:Erika.boll

Welcome
Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! —C.Fred (talk) 15:41, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Copyright problems with Leadership Initiatives
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Leadership Initiatives, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, Leadership Initiatives appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Leadership Initiatives has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 15:41, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

I was hoping you could help in establishing a credible Wikipedia page. I'm a newbie and could use any advice! Thank you.


 * You'll need to find independent reliable sources that demonstrate that the organization is notable. Sources written by Leadership Initiatives are not sufficent to verify the notability of the organization.


 * See also Articles for deletion/Leadership Initiatives. This is not the first time somebody (apparently) connected to the organization has tried to write an article on the organization. For the article to stand, it must be written from a neutral point-of-view and must rely on independent sources. —C.Fred (talk) 16:41, 17 May 2009 (UTC)


 * I suggest reading The business FAQ, but over all, the best thing you could do is follow the suggestions in the below welcome message, and also talk to us live.  Chzz  ►  16:48, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

Welcome
Hi, Erika.boll. This is NOT some automated message...it's from a real person. You can talk to me right now. Welcome to Wikipedia! I noticed you've just joined, and wanted to give you a few tips to get you started. If you have any questions, please talk to us. The tips below should help you to get started. Best of luck!  Chzz  ►  16:48, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

Question
Welcome!

I'm having trouble regarding copyright issues. I have sent in the necessary information to wikipedia, but have not had a response in days. I am a neutral point of view writing the article because I believe this organization is doing amazing things, and those who have not heard yet should have the sources to find out. Please help me!! Thank you.
 * Do you have any reliable sources about the organization? That may be the biggie here. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 22:22, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Okay, official primary sources are fine only if you have secondary sources to back it up. Do you have any news articles or the like? Non-trivial coverage from reputable websites? Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 14:52, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
 * I saw your revision in the sandbox here. It reads very, very promotionally, you might wanna read WP:NPOV. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 17:02, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Terms like "Created to empower men, women and children around the world…" are certainly promotional, as is making a big list of their visions. Try starting smaller. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 19:03, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 19:02, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

Leadership Initiatives is a repost of previously deleted content
A tag has been placed on requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, place the template hangon underneath the other template on the article and put a note on the page's discussion page saying why this article should stay. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of continuing to recreate the page. See specifically Articles for deletion/Leadership Initiatives. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 16:39, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

My page is deleted and I have taken all necessary action to prevent it! I have the copyright issues cleared and am confused as to further improvements. Help!
 * Please ask the admin who deleted it to userfy it, so you can keep the page text. Then, have an independent editor review it (use for that). fahadsadah (talk,contribs) 17:04, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
 * But if most of the article can be read at http://www.leadershipinitiatives.org/index.html, as with the version C.Fred just deleted, it will just be deleted again. If by "copyright issues cleared" you mean that you have obtained permission to use the website text in an article, you need to follow the steps in WP:Requesting copyright permission.--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 17:09, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
 * I can restore it into user space. One section of the article was a copyright violation. The remainder was still a (self-)promotion similar to the previously deleted version. In the absence of independent sourcing to demonstrate general notability, it was deleted as a repost of previously deleted material. I've just reviewed the version that went through the AfD process again, and the similarities with the most recent version are pretty extensive. Accordingly, I have deleted it under criterion G4, recreation of an article that was previously deleted through deletion discussion. —C.Fred (talk) 20:59, 28 May 2009 (UTC)


 * It's been restored to User:Erika.boll/Leadership Initiatives. —C.Fred (talk) 21:03, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

Help request
I was wondering if someone could look over this text for me! Thank you!


 * Don't panic :-) I have simply moved the article into a user subpage. It is now in User:Erika.boll/Leadership Initiatives - this is a user subpage, and you can develop the article there before it goes live. Also, notice that I removed the initial heading == Leadership Initiatives ==, and put the name in bold at the beginning; this is the standard format for articles.


 * The main concern is about the use of self-referential primary sources; all of the facts must be supported by reliable sources that are secondary - ie newspaper reports, books, etc. The references for facts need to go 'in-line'; I will add a section to the end of this talk page to explain how to do that, in a moment.


 * Please try to sort out the referencing issues, and when you have, or when you need further help, please add another section to the end of this talk page, and place another . Best of luck,   Chzz  ►  18:51, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 17:47, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

Simple references
These require two parts;


 * a)

Chzz is 98 years old.

He likes tea.


 * b) A section called "References" with the special code " ";

Named references
Chzz was born in 1837, in Footown.

Note that the second usage has a / (and no closing ref tag). This needs a reference section as above; please see user:chzz/demo/namedref to see the result.

Citation templates
You can put anything you like between, but using citation templates makes for a neat, consistent look;

Chzz has 37 Olympic medals.

Please see user:chzz/demo/citeref to see the result.

For more help and tips on that subject, see user:chzz/help/refs.

 Chzz  ►  18:54, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

Text Help!
 Chzz  ►  01:43, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

...I have replied again, as above.  Chzz  ►  23:36, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
Thank you for submitting an article at Articles for Creation. Your submission has been reviewed and has been put on hold pending clarification or improvements from you or other editors. Please take a look and respond if possible. You can find it at Wikipedia&. If there is no response within twenty-four hours the request may be declined; if this happens feel free to continue to work on the article and resubmit when you believe the concerns have been addressed. Thank you. Alexrexpvt (talk) 15:20, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

Leadership_Initiatives
 Chzz  ►  15:53, 3 June 2009 (UTC)


 * ...and I've just added a bit more to the above.  Chzz  ►  15:59, 3 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Just in case you hadn't seen the replies - it has now been archived, because messages on my talk page over 100 hours old are archived off. It is now in User talk:Chzz/Archive 10. You can always use the archive box at the top of my talk page to find such things - just search for your username.  Chzz  ►  12:08, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

Spotlight
Hi there. Hopefully you'll remember me, from my trying to help you; well, now it's my turn to ask for help.

I'm trying to help re-launch an idea called "Spotlight". The notion is to select an article and work on it collectively, via live discussion, for one week. If lots of people get involved, it can work really well; in the past, the project died off through lack of participants. Anyone can help out, because that's the whole point - we have many and varied skills, but between us, we can do amazing things. So - please join the channel, and add yourself to the participants in WP:SPOTLIGHT. Thanks for your time!  Chzz  ►  22:27, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

Non Profits
Hello, I replied to your note at  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fulldecent (talk • contribs) 18:25, 23 October 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Leadership Initiatives concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Leadership Initiatives, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 16:46, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Leadership Initiatives


The article Leadership Initiatives has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:NORG."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AleatoryPonderings (???) (!!!) 03:03, 29 October 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Leadership Initiatives for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Leadership Initiatives is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Leadership Initiatives& until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. AleatoryPonderings (???) (!!!) 03:05, 29 October 2020 (UTC)