User talk:Erikswedberg

Speedy deletion of CoughPHP
A tag has been placed on CoughPHP, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. CardinalDan (talk) 01:04, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Coughphp
A tag has been placed on Coughphp, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Dengero (talk) 01:45, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

Welcome
Welcome!

Hello, Erikswedberg, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted (if it hasn't already).

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on. Again, welcome! GraemeL (talk) 02:40, 21 November 2008 (UTC) --GraemeL (talk) 02:40, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Re: coughPHP
Well, first of all, for an article to be included in Wikipedia, it must meet the notability requirements found here. We have to follow this policy because if the subject of the article is not notable enough to have received at least a moderate level of coverage in reliable third-party sources, there is no way that readers can verify that what is written is true. Also, all articles must be written from a neutral point of view. While you may be able to fix your article's problems with neutrality, I'm afraid you won't be able to establish the subject's notability because there are no available reliable sources that will allow us to verify that what is written in the article is true. (the links above point to the various policy pages that relate to this) Regards. Thingg &#8853; &#8855; 02:40, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
 * To answer the second part of your question: (I was writing the above when you wrote it) Those two articles are included because they both have some coverage by reliable third party sources. While I would have to say the first article you mentioned is iffy, the second is definitely notable as it receives multiple reliable hits. Also another (though not really scientific) indication that those two projects are better known is the number of total hits they receive on a search engine. (1.55 million for the first and 2.84 million for the second versus 17100 for your article) Again, this isn't a really good way to test for notability, but does work fairly well to determine the level of interest in a particular computing project. Also, if you can find a reliable source that provides information about your article's subject, I will be more than willing to restore your page. I'll even help you write it if you want me to. But if you can't find a reliable source, I'm afraid I can't really do much to help you make the article meet Wikipedia's guidelines for inclusion. Thingg &#8853; &#8855;  02:51, 21 November 2008 (UTC)