User talk:Erikvoss

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place   on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! -- Rory 0 96 05:03, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Appeal for Human Rights
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Appeal for Human Rights, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.crmvet.org/docs/aa4hr.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 05:32, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

Erik Voss - Feb. 26th, 2010: While the content in question is presently removed, I believe the Committee on the Appeal for Human Right' very likely considers this document to be the public domain. I intend to confirm this today, Feb. 26th, 2010, at a meeting with COAHR and re-post full text version if that is indeed the case.'

Re:Please advise as to what you are concerned about in regards to edits to page African-American Civil Rights Movement (1955–1968)
-  F ASTILYsock (T ALK ) 06:34, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

'Erik Voss: Feb. 26th, 2010 - Well that is a relief ... just a coincidence, fortunately.'

Proposed deletion of An Appeal for Human Right - March 9th, 1960 - Full Text


The article An Appeal for Human Right - March 9th, 1960 - Full Text has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Should be moved to wikisource

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. De728631 (talk) 18:32, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of An Appeal for Human Rights v.III
A tag has been placed on An Appeal for Human Rights v.III requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Ironholds (talk) 19:15, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ethnocism


The article Ethnocism has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unreferenced, needs reliable sources, e.g. more than mere blogposts; Most likely neologism (no entry in Webster's), if so, see WP:NOT (dictionary); needs to be more than a coatrack.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 02:18, 23 June 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Ethnocism for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ethnocism is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Ethnocism until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Tijfo098 (talk) 19:58, 2 April 2011 (UTC)