User talk:Eringenetics

Welcome!
Hello, Eringenetics, and welcome to Wikipedia!&#32;Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article.&#32;Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or another editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

In addition, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for any contribution you make, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation to comply with our terms our use and policy on paid editing.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
 * The plain and simple conflict of interest guide
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! -- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 22:25, 4 December 2018 (UTC)

December 2018
Hello, I'm RA0808. I noticed that in this edit to Kenneth Blum, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. RA 0808 talkcontribs 22:15, 4 December 2018 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Kenneth Blum, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Kirbanzo (talk) 22:24, 4 December 2018 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Ad Orientem (talk) 22:31, 4 December 2018 (UTC)

I have responded Kirbanzo with evidence there are false statements listed on the page: 1. Dr. Blum was never the Chief Scientific Officer of Proove Diagnostics, so that reference needs to be removed. 2. Dr. Blum is not listed as the Chief Scientific Officer of Dominion Diagnostics, he is a consultant. That reference to Dominion and some fraud case is extremely defamatory. 3. It states RDS (reward deficiency syndrome) is not recognized by the American Psychiatric Association. It has been listed with the Sage Encyclopedia of Behavioral Health since 2016, and taught in every U.S. medical school. 4. The references to Quackwatch are almost 30 years old and were opinion articles. Since that time, genetic technology has advanced and has since proven all of Dr. Blum's science.

These are clearly false statements listed on the page, and extremely misleading how the original author is trying to tie things to Dr. Blum that are in accurate. Can we please get these statements corrected?