User talk:Erinkatemc

April 2015
Your addition to ASTM International has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Dennis Bratland (talk) 15:08, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

Your addition to ASTM International has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Copy paste from http://www.astm.org/ABOUT/imgs/ASTMFactSheet_Eng.pdf  Dennis Bratland (talk) 17:27, 9 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Nobody cares about the logo. It is too simple to copyright, and even if it wasn't, the terms of use you're going on about are trademark restrictions. The real problem here is that you keep copy-pasting text into articles. Your site restricts copyright on that text, even if you work for them. Even if it weren't copyrighted, it's still plagiarism. Even if it weren't plagiarism, it is promotional marketing BS. Wikipedia only wants text that is original, not copied, and neutral. Dennis Bratland (talk) 19:52, 9 April 2015 (UTC)