User talk:Eriut68

Conflict of interest warning
If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. cab (talk) 12:14, 13 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Please stop including the &reg; mark for your product's name. We don't use this mark on Wikipedia. See WP:TRADEMARK for full guidelines. cab (talk) 06:47, 19 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Thank you for the link to the guidelines regarding use of trademarks. So many guidelines, so little time - I managed to miss this one, so please don't bite the newcomer. For what it's worth, it's actually not our/my product's name, but I have worked with trademark administration/prosecution/consulting for so many years that unless instructed otherwise, I will always use these markings by default. In many legislations, improper use may be detrimental to trademark rights. As a matter of fact, in the country where I live and work at the moment, publishers of encyclopedias, dictionaries or other similar printed matter are bound by law to respect trademark rights e.g. by using due markings or other appropriate indications. Also, as far as I understand, it is in accordance with Wikipedia policy and mission to spread accurate information, which implies that it is important, and certainly in the interest of the public at large, to distinguish between trademarked products and their generic denominations, isn't it? But once again thanks for your message. Eriut68 (talk) 08:37, 19 January 2010 (UTC)