User talk:Eriuvation

Speedy deletion nomination of User:VoxWorld.Coop


A tag has been placed on User:VoxWorld.Coop, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Peridon (talk) 16:47, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

September 2015
Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames which give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; please take a moment to create a new account with a username that represents only yourself as an individual and which complies with our username policy. You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose. If your username does not represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text below this notice. You may simply create a new account, but you may prefer to change your username to one that complies with our username policy, so that your past contributions are associated with your new username. If you would prefer to change your username, you may appeal this username block by adding the text below this notice. Thank you. Peridon (talk) 16:48, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

Contested deletion
This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... (I am new to Wiki and am learning your rules. I have no interest in it being promotional in nature. I gave a whole series of Citations but forgot to Save them - being new to Wiki postings - and being in Ireland just went to dinner but came back to find Citations not saved and your notice instead. I wrote the piece as the start of establishing what I hoped and still expect to be a long and fruitful relationship with Wiki - which I have always use for reference and greatly respect. I will learn what I need to learn by reading more of your guidance information as advised, and amend my text accordingly, plus add all the necessary Citations as evidence of VOX business name registrations and relationships. I have a strong social media presence in general and want to proceed to wiki books with you. If you require more information please ask, I will be happy to oblige. Regards, Richard O'Farrell, Social Innovator & Sociopreneur, VoxLabs & VoxWorld.Coop )--VoxWorld.Coop (talk) 18:38, 24 September 2015 (UTC) Richard O'Farrell, Social Innovator & Sociopreneur, VoxLabs & VoxWorld.Coop
 * No-one is saying you aren't to do with Vox - the problem is that we don't allow user names that appear to represent organisations, and unless that's 'coop' as in chicken rather than in 'co-op' yours does. On your user page, terms like 'new and dynamic' and 'promotes Communities as a force-for-change, uniquely...'are regarded as promotional. Things on Wikipedia must be neutral. Peridon (talk) 21:28, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
 * By the way, Wikipedia is not social media. It is an encyclopaedia. Peridon (talk) 21:29, 24 September 2015 (UTC)


 * I've sorted out the template above - you'd lost a bracket at both ends. Won't work without double brackets. Someone independent will look in now. Peridon (talk) 18:23, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Kilcurl


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Kilcurl requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. -&copy;2015 Compassionate727( Talk )( Contributions ) 15:05, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 15
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ballyhale, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael Fennelly. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Thank you, I've sorted that link now, thank you and much appreciated.Eriuvation (talk) 12:56, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

January 2016
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=700910403 your edit] to Glanbia may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:49, 21 January 2016 (UTC) Thank you. I have corrected that now.Eriuvation (talk) 11:58, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Loughcullen Co-Operative Creamery Ltd.

February 2016
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=704806414 your edit] to County Kilkenny may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:52, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
 * County Kilkenny]] Co-Operative Agricultural &amp; Dairy Society Ltd., Kilmanagh, County Kilkenny] Co-Operative Creamery Ltd., Kilkenny City Co-Operative Creamery Ltd., Leinster Milk

Thank you, I have made those amendments.

I have extensively edited National Ploughing Championships article with extensive citations, to make it a true and accurate reflection of its authoratively recorded history in print and video so far. Could you please guide on what else should to be done to satisfy your editors as per their continuing note on its header. Thank you. Eriuvation (talk) 10:49, 24 February 2016 (UTC) ==Deletion pending for File:Mr Sean O&#39;Farrell, Managing Director of National Ploughing Association (NPA) of Ireland meets President of French Republic, Charles De Gaulle, at 9th World Ploughing Championships in Grignon, Paris, France, 1961.jpeg== Hello, Eriuvation. Some time ago, a file you uploaded &mdash; File:Mr Sean O& &mdash; was tagged with OTRS pending, indicating that you (or perhaps the copyright holder if you did not create this image) submitted a statement of permission to permissions-en@wikimedia.org. Though there is often a backlog processing messages received at this address, we should have received your message by now.


 * If you have not submitted (or forwarded) a statement of permission, please send it immediately to permissions-en@wikimedia.org and let us know at the OTRS noticeboard that you have done so.


 * If you have already sent this message, it is possible that there was a problem receiving it. Please re-send it to permissions-en@wikimedia.org and let us know at the OTRS noticeboard that you have done so.

If we don't hear from you within one week, the file will be deleted. If we can help you, please feel free to ask at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 14:45, 6 May 2016 (UTC) OTRS pendingEriuvation (talk) 13:31, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

==File permission problem with File:Mr Sean O&#39;Farrell, Managing Director of National Ploughing Association (NPA) of Ireland meets President of French Republic, Charles De Gaulle, at 9th World Ploughing Championships in Grignon, Paris, France, 1961.jpeg== Thanks for uploading File:Mr Sean O&. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. OTRS pendingEriuvation (talk) 13:33, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

ATTENTION : This is an automated, BOT-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate your file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

I have now located and provided written proof of creator/ owner of photo Charles de Gaulle and my late uncle Sean O'Farrell from 1961 and forwarded written declaration of ownership together with permissions for use as you requested to permissions-en@wikimedia.org Eriuvation (talk) 09:56, 4 April 2017 (UTC) I do understand what a heavy workload editors must have at Wikipedia. I would appreciate, however, if you could give some indication of when you can grant permission for this photo to be republished based on the appropriate permissions evidence having been obtained and provided on April 4th after a year of searching.Eriuvation (talk) 12:15, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Hi Eriuvation, I have commented out two OTRS pending tags on your talk page. These tags need to be placed on the file page or article talk page (including the talk page of draft articles) - NOT on your talk page.  If there is a deleted item for which permission has been submitted to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, you can ask at WP:OTRSN for someone to look for the email and restore the article if they can find it. --B (talk) 01:33, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

Dublin
I've reviewed your additions to the Dublin article. All those people are already mentioned in the arts section so a separate section in unnecessary and beside which those details you added are appropriate to their own article not to the city article. We don't need lots of details about all the topics listed in the article about the city. Thanks ww2censor (talk) 11:44, 10 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Thank you for your observations, I have relooked at your thinking. I believed that I was adding real value to the existing article by only selecting and briefly highlighting great Dublin born achievers of exceptional merit who had been recognised by exceptional international and rare Irish awards including Nobel Prizewinners for Literature, French Order of Merit, Order of the British Empire (MBE and Irish Oscar winners. These distinctions matter a great deal to Dublin people, living as we are on a small island and especially matter to our vast Diasporas. However, I do understand if you do not still agree with my point of view.Eriuvation (talk) 12:06, 10 May 2017 (UTC) Alternatively, would a separate page on Great Irish Prople be acceptable in principle to you, including only exceptional people of the past that were born in this country, separared by county and distinguished from famous others by being recipients of international awards of great merit such as I described earlier. I would appreciate your guidance in this matter. Thank you again.Eriuvation (talk) 13:13, 10 May 2017 (UTC)


 * We already have List of people from Dublin, so you suggestion is somewhat redundant though as a list it is not populated with lots of facts about the person, which are intended for their own articles. One should really keep the prose on point to the topic in question, especially as it is so easy to add links for readers to follow if they want more details. ww2censor (talk) 12:40, 11 May 2017 (UTC)Thank you, I understand and will act on your adviceEriuvation (talk) 07:36, 16 May 2017 (UTC)