User talk:Erkunkel/sandbox

Article evaluation
Article evaluation for https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_communication.

Content evaluation: '''Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?''' ·Underneath the strategies section, only three forms of communication are mentioned- direct, entertainment, and interpersonal. While these are valid topics, what about them makes this type of communication effective? They mentioned social networking, but what about print?

'''Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?''' ·The section denoting establishment appears out of date, but also does not really give background information as to why the topic of health communication was created. ·Under the research section, statistics are mentioned but are not cited. In addition, are these statistics still correct? Since a citation was not included, the legitimacy of the article has decreased.

What else could be improved? ·Under the research section, citations need to be dramatically improved. When citing a source, a professor during my undergrad told me "author "comma" year" will keep you here". In addition, page numbers should be cited such as (p.34).