User talk:ErnestoCabral2018

Sa

October 2018
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to Goosebumps 2: Haunted Halloween, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the article will look like without actually saving it.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Peaceray (talk) 06:20, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

November 2018
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Goosebumps (film), it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. ''Please don't add your own personal analysis of whether something was a "success". Wikipedia does not label whether a film is successful or not. It just states how much it grossed.'' NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:36, 29 November 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 24
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Wally's Wonderland, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kevin Lewis ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Wally%27s_Wonderland check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Wally%27s_Wonderland?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:13, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

April 2021
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Z16 talk  04:20, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

July 2021
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Chucky (TV series), it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. — Young Forever (talk)   23:55, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

The Suicide Squad (film)
Please refrain from edit warring as you are doing at this article. I have already explained that the information should not be included several times, and why. You need to stop reverting. - adamstom97 (talk) 05:28, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Please self-revert. You are vandalising the page because you are repeatedly adding incorrect information to the article that has been reverted many times. Take it out and stop edit warring, or I will need to report you. - adamstom97 (talk) 06:00, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry about reverting your talk page comment, clearly I was interpreting your comments in a way that others did not. In the future, when other editors are telling you to stop and are starting discussions about your behaviour at your talk page you really must stop edit warring. - adamstom97 (talk) 05:33, 13 August 2021 (UTC)

August 2021
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on The Suicide Squad (film). This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. —El Millo (talk) 16:53, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Spider-Man: No Way Home, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. —El Millo (talk) 02:58, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at It Chapter Two, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.

What If...? Episode 9 summary
190 words. Count them: "The Watcher recruits Strange Supreme, Captain Carter, Star-Lord T'Challa, Party Thor, Black Panther Killmonger, and a variant of Gamora who killed Thanos from their respective universes to battle Ultron. They travel to an uninhabited universe to prepare, but Thor accidentally draws Ultron's attention. T'Challa steals the Soul Stone from Ultron and Strange summons zombies as a distraction while the team escapes to Ultron's home universe, where they are joined by Natasha Romanoff. Ultron overpowers them until Romanoff, with Carter's help, shoots Ultron with an arrow containing Arnim Zola's mind. Zola wipes Ultron from the inside while Killmonger takes the Stones. Zola, now controlling Ultron's body, fights Killmonger for the Stones until Strange and the Watcher freeze them in a pocket dimension. Strange returns to his collapsed universe to guard Zola and Killmonger while the Watcher returns Carter, T'Challa, Gamora, and Thor to their respective universes. Romanoff refuses to return to her destroyed universe, so the Watcher brings her to the universe in which the Avengers candidates were assassinated, where she helps defeat Loki. In a mid-credits scene, Carter and her universe's Romanoff discover the Hydra Stomper armor with someone inside."

Fullmetal2887 (discuss me) 01:44, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
 * If you keep reverting my changes and engaging in edit warring, I will get you blocked from that page. Fullmetal2887 (discuss me) 01:47, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

October 2021
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Willy's Wonderland. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. – wallyfromdilbert (talk) 15:57, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

December 2021
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Child's Play (2019 film). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. – wallyfromdilbert (talk) 03:48, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Child's Play (2019 film), you may be blocked from editing. – wallyfromdilbert (talk) 19:57, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Nomination of Pibby for deletion
A discussion is taking place to determine if the article Pibby is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Pibby until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 00:01, 25 December 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Death by Misadventure
Hello, ErnestoCabral2018. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Death by Misadventure, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:01, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Death by Misadventure


Hello, ErnestoCabral2018. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Death by Misadventure".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 16:31, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

May 2022
Hello, I'm Centcom08. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Centcom08 (talk) 14:38, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

The Mean One moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, The Mean One, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. BOVINEBOY 2008 08:17, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

December 2022
Hello. I have noticed that you edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks!  Mike  Allen  03:31, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

January 2023
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Winnie-the-Pooh: Blood and Honey, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. According to the production company the character is credited as "Pooh Bear". Is there something you aren't understanding when you change content while ignoring hidden notes and provide no edit summary?  Mike  Allen  01:40, 18 January 2023 (UTC)


 * You don't own any page on Wikipedia. Just follow the guidelines and collaboratively edit peacefully.  I don't have to like a goddamn movie to edit the article. I'm not going to edit war over Five Nights at Freddy's (I mean really..)  I've just been trying to keep francruft out of it and making sure it stays reliably sourced.    Not that you give a shit, but the source you posted is not reliable.
 * You won't last much longer here, I mean your talk page is full of so many goddamn warnings it's mind blowing you've haven't been blocked. So carry on... :)  Mike  Allen   02:40, 21 July 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Five Nights at Freddy&#39;s (2023) - Theatrical release poster.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Five Nights at Freddy&. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:14, 7 September 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Pibby
Hello, ErnestoCabral2018. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Pibby, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:01, 8 September 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Untitled Winnie-the-Pooh: Blood and Honey sequel for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Untitled Winnie-the-Pooh: Blood and Honey sequel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Untitled Winnie-the-Pooh: Blood and Honey sequel until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Di (they-them) (talk) 06:59, 9 September 2023 (UTC)

November 2023
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Demon Slayer: Kimetsu no Yaiba, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Xexerss (talk) 08:09, 16 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on Demon Slayer: Kimetsu no Yaiba – To the Hashira Training
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Demon Slayer: Kimetsu no Yaiba – To the Hashira Training, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:Qwerfjkl/Botpreload&editintro=User:Qwerfjkl/boteditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:Qwerfjkl&preloadtitle=Qwerfjkl%20(bot)%20–%20ErnestoCabral2018&section=new&preloadparams%5b%5d=&preloadparams%5b%5d=1198173801 report it to my operator]. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 07:57, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
 * A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ([//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Demon_Slayer:_Kimetsu_no_Yaiba_%E2%80%93_To_the_Hashira_Training&action=edit&minor=minor&summary=Fixing+reference+error+raised+by+%5B%5BUser%3AQwerfjkl%20(bot)%7CQwerfjkl%20(bot)%5D%5D Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:Qwerfjkl%20(bot)/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F1198173801%7CDemon%20Slayer:%20Kimetsu%20no%20Yaiba%20–%20To%20the%20Hashira%20Training%5D%5D Ask for help])

MfD nomination of Draft talk:Saving Bikini Bottom: The Sandy Cheeks Movie
Draft talk:Saving Bikini Bottom: The Sandy Cheeks Movie, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft talk:Saving Bikini Bottom: The Sandy Cheeks Movie and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Draft talk:Saving Bikini Bottom: The Sandy Cheeks Movie during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Magical Golden Whip (talk) 19:28, 23 January 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Demon Slayer: Kimetsu no Yaiba – To the Hashira Training for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Demon Slayer: Kimetsu no Yaiba – To the Hashira Training is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Demon Slayer: Kimetsu no Yaiba – To the Hashira Training until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:33, 24 January 2024 (UTC)

May 2024
Hello. I have noticed that you edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks!  Mike  Allen   16:38, 17 May 2024 (UTC)