User talk:Erokhin

June 2020
Hello, I'm WikiHannibal. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Norilsk oil spill, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. WikiHannibal (talk) 16:13, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
 * WikiHannibal this is a translation of Russian Wikipedia, sources in there: Утечка_дизельного_топлива_в_Норильске. --Erokhin (talk) 16:19, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Hi, sources need to be in the article, usually as refs to each statement (sentence/paragraph). See WP:RS, WP:BURDEN for more guidance. Thanks, WikiHannibal (talk) 16:22, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
 * WikiHannibal thanks for the advice, I will do it. Russian Wikipedia has more details. --Erokhin (talk) 16:31, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

Oleg Deripaska
On a related note, why have you removed large portions of sourced text from Oleg Deripaska in February? Unexplained removal of sourced content may be seen as WP:VANDAL. WikiHannibal (talk) 16:23, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
 * WikiHannibal, I'm not a vandal. I wrote an article as in Russian Wikipedia. --Erokhin (talk) 16:26, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Hi, I did not say you were. However, unexplained removals of sourced content may be seen as illegitimate blanking, i.e. as vandalism, see WP:VANDTYPES. There is no reason the English version of the article should mimic the Russian (or any other) version, esp. when that involves removing sourced content. Generally, it is good practice to explain the reason behind your changes in the edit summary (or at the talk page in case of large changes such as your removals). I have restored much of the content you removed. Feel free to improve the article by checking/adding sources and editing according to them, adding new sourced content, removing unsourced content. WikiHannibal (talk) 18:22, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
 * WikiHannibal thanks, I really was in a hurry. I will be more attentive. --Erokhin (talk) 18:28, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 9
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Alexander Shishkov, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Polish. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 9 November 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 7
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dmitry Galkovsky, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Conservator.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:22, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 3
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Moscow, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Armenian, Chechen and Tajik.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

Igor Teologov moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Igor Teologov, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ItcouldbepossibleTalk 15:14, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ksenia Shoygu


The article Ksenia Shoygu has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "BLP lacks non-routine coverage in independent sources"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MrsSnoozyTurtle 08:13, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Ksenia Shoygu


A tag has been placed on Ksenia Shoygu requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Articles for deletion/Ksenia Shoygu. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. MrsSnoozyTurtle 21:30, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, Erokhin. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Oleg Deripaska, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Conflict of interest);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Spam);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. ''You have a history of removing negative content from the page of Oleg Deripaska and adding negative content to the page of Vladimir Chernukhin. Given that the two persons Deripaska and Chernukhin are involved in a litigation, do you have any conflict of interest? If you don't have as such, can you explain your such behavior? Moreover your attempts to create non-notable individuals linked to Derpaska e.g. Ksenia Shoygu and Igor Teologov make this appear to be a very probable case of COI. Please state and explain the facts.Vloskim Kramář (talk) 19:31, 10 April 2022 (UTC)''
 * Pinging, who identified unexplained content blanking from Deripaska's page. Vloskim Kramář (talk) 19:35, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

April 2022
Hello, I'm Vloskim Kramář. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Vladimir Chernukhin seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. ''Though there are lot of other issues, this seems to be one of the primary concern of Erokhin's edit history in relation to Vladimir Chernukhin page. See Talk:Vladimir_Chernukhin for more.'' Vloskim Kramář (talk) 19:37, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Igor Teologov
Hello, Erokhin. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Igor Teologov, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:03, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Igor Teologov


Hello, Erokhin. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Igor Teologov".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 15:23, 29 July 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)