User talk:Erowe33

Pyramid power
Please note that Wikipedia's standard response to people who persist in trying to insert pseudoscience into articles is to block them from editing. Either discuss it on the article talk page, after reading Reliable sources, or take this nonsense somewhere else. AndyTheGrump (talk) 01:13, 9 June 2021 (UTC)

And while you are at it, read Edit warring. AndyTheGrump (talk) 01:46, 9 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Thank you for taking it to the talk page - I have moved your comment to the bottom of of the page, where new threads normally go, and added a signature (see Signatures). I will respond there shortly. AndyTheGrump (talk) 01:53, 9 June 2021 (UTC)

June 2021
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, you may be blocked from editing. ''Wikipedia is not a soapbox for the promotion of fringe theories. If you do not stop edit warring, you will be blocked from editing to prevent further disruption.'' RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 01:50, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Additionally, note that you already appear to have broken the 3 revert rule. Consider the above as final warning - on Wikipedia, collaboration is required. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 01:52, 9 June 2021 (UTC)

On Wikipedia
Hello, I have noticed your recent editing and user page. I would just like correct a few misconceptions about Wikipedia: The WP:GEVAL policy makes clear that ideas and opinions are not all equal and should not be presented as having equal validity. A reading of WP:NPOV, WP:PSCI and WP:RS will also show that Wikipedia must present the mainstream academic view like those of reliable sources (and their bias). Happy editing, — Paleo Neonate  – 01:25, 12 June 2021 (UTC)

Notice
 Acroterion   (talk)   16:36, 13 June 2021 (UTC)