User talk:Erpert/Archive 13

Nomination of Ippy Aiona for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ippy Aiona is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Ippy Aiona until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  DGG ( talk ) 21:02, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

Justin Kuykendall
I've gone ahead and relisted this article at AFD. The debate may be found Articles for deletion/Justin Kuykendall (2nd nomination). When you closed the original debate, the Pulpo Media debate had already been going for a week. Adding in an article at that late date isn't going to work, and was actively opposed by some editors (including the original nominator). Given that, it's cleaner just to re-do the debate. No Problem, just wanted to make sure you knew what I was doing and why. Best, UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 20:13, 23 August 2013 (UTC)

Hi! I'm Smrithi! Thanks for advicing! It helped me! Nd how do u came to know tat i edited it? Smrithi Suresh (talk) 16:38, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

sorry to bother you but
my edit to "mac & me" was correct so if you don't mind I'm going to revert it, thank you 5.65.133.230 (talk) 13:11, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Yeah, sure it was.  Erpert  WHAT DO YOU WANT??? 18:46, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

have you actually watched mac & me? if you had you would stop trolling me 5.65.133.230 (talk) 19:12, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

Consequences for cyberbullying
This is your last warning. The next time you attempt to bully users, as you did to 5.65.133.230 (talk) 19:21, 17 November 2013 (UTC), you may be given a time-out without further notice.  Erpert  5.65.133.230 (talk) 19:21, 17 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Warning you for your own persistent vandalism is cyberbullying? That's a new one (plus, you signed the template with my name).  Erpert  WHAT DO YOU WANT??? 02:03, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

Category:People from Fayette City, Pennsylvania
Category:People from Fayette City, Pennsylvania, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. ...William 13:22, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 24
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Sarah Shevon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Caucasian people


 * Sovereign Syre (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Caucasian people

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Earth Balance concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Earth Balance, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:04, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 1
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Aleska Diamond, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page AVN (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:34, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Josh Hutchersonm

 * Hello Erpert. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Josh Hutchersonm, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: not recently created, so not R3; let the RfD take care of it. Thank you.  JohnCD (talk) 08:56, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
 * I searched the archives and I didn't see an RfD for it. System error?  Erpert  WHAT DO YOU WANT??? 09:02, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
 * It's one of a large batch of ridiculous redirects at Redirects for discussion/Log/2013 December 4. JohnCD (talk) 09:11, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

ANI open on Iryna Harpy
I'll bring to your attention that this isn't the first case of cyberbullying by Iryna Harpy. See my comments son the open ANI. Please note, I am completely uninvolved with the Holodomor article. Ajh1492 (talk) 17:24, 15 December 2013 (UTC)

Enlightment on JMS article

 * macauthors contributions were not primary sources which Harizotoh9 seems to be using as the basis for the reversion. It appears no effort was made by HARI to review the citations. Secondly primary sourcing IS PERMITTED with conditional guidelines laid out in the rules section under BLP.  Have you read that section?   Apparently no single contributor including the admin contributors have read that section.  Therefore, I ask that you not pontificate to me about good faith edits on the JMS page.MrTownCar (talk) 13:20, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
 * You could have easily discussed this in the ANI thread.  Erpert  WHAT DO YOU WANT??? 18:50, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

Official website

 * Regarding [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nica_Noelle&diff=prev&oldid=581155280], what makes you say http://nicanoellestudios.com/ is not an official website. It says it's official, it looks official, and it's for example linked at http://www.salon.com/writer/nica_noelle/. The user who added it in [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nica_Noelle&diff=563239415&oldid=560896382] said "I am her publicist" at Help desk. We haven't checked the identity and a publicist has obvious COI issues but the site looks official regardless. PrimeHunter (talk) 00:50, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
 * I'm at work so I can't check the site out right now (it's been so long since I posted that that I forgot what the site looks like). It'll be about seven hours before I can get to it.  Erpert  WHAT DO YOU WANT??? 00:57, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Okay, now I see it. I don't remember why I disputed it, actually. No objections.  Erpert  WHAT DO YOU WANT??? 09:31, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks. The website has been readded. PrimeHunter (talk) 11:08, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

Talk:Swingin'
Thanks, I took up your invite and did make the jazz album stub. In ictu oculi (talk) 02:19, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

European Court of Human Rights's Decision is NOT a DEFAMATORY content
You warned me to add "defamatory content" in Talk:Armenian Genocide page (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Armenian_Genocide). Notice that what I added is the DECISION OF EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS about Armenian "Genocide". You CANNOT LABEL the decision of ECtHR as "Defamatory Content". I will complain about you in related Wikipedia forums. Notice and think twice whether the following content is defamatory:

European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) Decision On The 1915 Armenian Event
This must be added to the article: On 17 December 2013, (the case: Perinçek v. Switzerland (application no. 27510/08)) European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) punished Switzerland for criminally convicting Mr. Perinçek for publicly challenging the existence of the Armenian genocide. Perinçek said "Armenian genocide is an international lie". ECHR punished Switzerland for violating Perinçek's right of freedom of expression (Article 10). ECHR referenced three decisions on its verdict: a. In November 2007, The Spanish Constitutional Court had found unconstitutional the offence of negation and had taken the view that the mere negation of a crime of genocide did not constitute direct incitement to violence. b. In February 2012, the French Constitutional Council had declared unconstitutional a law which made it a criminal offence to deny the existence of the genocides recognised by the law, finding it to be incompatible with freedom of expression and freedom of research. c. The United Nations Human Rights Committee had expressed its conviction that “[l]aws that penalize[d] the expression of opinions about historical facts [were] incompatible with the obligations that the Covenant [on Civil and Political Rights] impose[d] on States parties ...” and that the “Covenant [did] not permit general prohibition of expressions of an erroneous opinion or an incorrect interpretation of past events”.

I hope now that the researchers can freely and without any fear research what happened in 1915. Notice that in 2013 ALL Ottoman Empire archieves are open to the researchers and any researcher can freely read ALL the archieves and documents in Turkey. However, Armenia still does not allow its archieves to be searched and reserached. 212.174.38.3 (talk) 14:20, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
 * You seem to be really confused as to what Wikipedia is all about. And judging from your statements, I'm guessing English isn't your first language, so you might be better at the wiki of your native language (also, reference sections don't belong on talk pages).  Erpert  WHAT DO YOU WANT??? 08:30, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
 * If you cannot tolerate or become patient about a counter thought what can I say more?!! You even qualify the "Decision of European Court of Human Rights in 17.12.2013" as a "Defamatory Content" in my talk page (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:212.174.38.3). Do you really believe what you say? Is the "Decision of European Court of Human Rights in 17.12.2013 on 1915 Events" a "Defamatory Content" according to you? If so, then, what is not a defamatory content? 212.174.38.3 (talk) 08:36, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Go away or I'm reporting you to WP:AIV.  Erpert  WHAT DO YOU WANT??? 08:43, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
 * The reporting of you may give enough idea whether "I am really publishing a defamatory content" or "you are not neutral enough on the subject discussed".212.174.38.3 (talk) 08:48, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

Harrasment
Whilst accepting my remark to AssociateAffiliate was cheeky - I would like you to show where I have harrassed him. He, after all, uses abusive responses (User CDTPP) and believes any editing of his submissions is some fundamental crime. By examining some of his edits you will see he is prone to repitition and clunky grammar. In perhaps a dozen occasions over several months, I have proof edited them — Preceding unsigned comment added by LTWAP (talk • contribs) 14:16, 28 December 2013 (UTC) CDTPP (talk) 14:17, 28 December 2013 (UTC)(someone else had logged in)

Thank you
Hi Erpert, thank you for providing a WP:3O at Talk:Ocean Grove, New Jersey. Also, I'm sorry you were inexplicably attacked by another editor for doing so. Coincidentally, coming to your talk page led me to this for the first time. Amen. Safehaven86 (talk) 08:29, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
 * I don't really think that was an attack, but whatever. Have a nice day. :)  Erpert  WHAT DO YOU WANT??? 18:41, 30 December 2013 (UTC)