User talk:Erpert/Archive 4

Wikiquette discussion

 * I posted a severe comment at your wikiquette discussion which was meant to draw the issue to a close. I asked you and to stop editing Wikipedia for a few days to cool down. By continuing to post at that discussion (diff) you are effectively inviting HuskyHuskie to post another response, which, if   then this issue will drag on and on. Such continual posting by you when you have been asked not to could be construed as WP:BAIT. I ask you once again. Please cool off for a few days Senra (Talk) 20:25, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
 * I thought that was only a suggestion. Anyway, what I said afterwards stated quite clearly that not only am I already cooled down, but that I would have no problem closing the thread as well (I have absolutely no intention of posting again in the thread; I did post later in a different thread, however). But to tell me that I can't edit for a few days at all when I haven't been topic banned, blocked, or even warned is overreacting, don't you think?  Erpert  Who is this guy? 05:55, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
 * I completely agree with Erpert on this matter. HuskyHuskie (talk) 12:52, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
 * No hard feelings then.  Erpert  Who is this guy? 16:39, 27 October 2011 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Nica Noelle Sinn Sage.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Nica Noelle Sinn Sage.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 09:06, 28 October 2011 (UTC)

Attack page
Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 18:15, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
 * What are you talking about?  Erpert  Who is this guy? 19:23, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
 * That's the standard template notification when a page is nominated for speedy deletion as an overt violation of WP:BLP. I don't recall the page name (it's already been speedied) but it was a redirect identifying a named person as a porn performer, based only on an unverifiable claim at IMDB. Those generally get deleted on sight. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 21:34, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
 * That is definitely not the standard notification template. The template you used was warning me about creating attack pages, which I have never done (and never will do). Maybe you should read WP:UTM more thoroughly.  Erpert  Who is this guy? 05:38, 29 October 2011 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Nica Noelle Sinn Sage.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Nica Noelle Sinn Sage.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please remove the tag.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. We hope (talk) 21:50, 28 October 2011 (UTC)

A couple things
Thanks for the articles that you've been creating! I just wanted to take a minute to point out a couple things though. Thanks again, Dismas |(talk) 05:06, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) WP:UNLINKDATES - Basically, don't wikilink dates (birth dates, etc) just because they're dates.
 * 2) WP:RS/IMDB - IMDb is not considered a reliable source for biographical info. Birth dates and other personal info should not be sourced to IMDb.

Notability of a Wikipedia Biography
Mr. Erpert, I am calm as can be, and if that doesn't come across in my writing, then I guess you aren't used to writers responding to you who have the capability of asserting themselves by using it as I do. Everything I said is in fact notable, whether you are talking about notability from a Wiki standpoint, or the kind of notability that is discussed in any English dictionary. Allow me to ask you this Erpert, do you like to post topics out here in an effort to get people to respond so then you can use this venue to argue about how right you are? Because that is the feeling I am getting from your comments, which means my continuing to comment will just be a waste of my time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Iammissannette (talk • contribs) 20:15, 4 November 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Kiwi Ling for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kiwi Ling is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Kiwi Ling until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 21:55, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

Don't open frivolous sockpuppet investigations to harass editors you disagree with!
Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 04:11, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Oh, knock it off. In fact, in response to your comment here, you're the one that's throwing a snit. You've even been blocked before for this kind of behavior; what is it with you?  Erpert  Who is this guy? 04:18, 15 November 2011 (UTC)

A kitten for you!
Thank you for your kind welcome to Wikipedia. Your chivalrous behavior clearly proves your virtues as a gentleman. If only more users demonstrated your tact, generosity, and discretion, this site would be greatly improved. I welcome the day when I can nominate you at RFA, with the assurance that the entirety of your conduct in this matter will significantly increase your chances of success.

Alessandra Napolitano (talk) 05:35, 15 November 2011 (UTC) 

License tagging for File:Girls Kissing Girls Vol 1.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Girls Kissing Girls Vol 1.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 10:05, 25 November 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Sweetheart Video logo.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Sweetheart Video logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a template, along with your question, beneath this message.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 17:26, 25 November 2011 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Lesbian Adventures Strap-On Specialist.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Lesbian Adventures Strap-On Specialist.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 12:05, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Melissa Monet
Hello, Erpert, and thanks for contributing to Wikipedia!

I wanted to let you know that some editors are discussing at Articles for deletion/Melissa Monet whether the article Melissa Monet should be in Wikipedia. I encourage you to comment there if you think the article should be kept in the encyclopedia.

The deletion discussion doesn't mean you did something wrong. In fact, other editors may have useful suggestions on how you can continue editing and improving Melissa Monet, which I encourage you to do. If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the Help Desk.

Thanks again for your contributions! Night of the Big Wind talk  22:54, 30 November 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Girls Kissing Girls 1: Young Lesbians in Love


A tag has been placed on Girls Kissing Girls 1: Young Lesbians in Love requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. ~ Excesses ~ (talk) 14:53, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Girls Kissing Girls 1: Young Lesbians in Love


The article Girls Kissing Girls 1: Young Lesbians in Love has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No reliable sources indicating that this film meets WP:NFILM.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SmartSE (talk) 16:21, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Girls Kissing Girls 1: Young Lesbians in Love for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Girls Kissing Girls 1: Young Lesbians in Love is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Girls Kissing Girls 1: Young Lesbians in Love until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. SmartSE (talk) 17:10, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Girls Kissing Girls 2: Foreplay Loving Lesbians for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Girls Kissing Girls 2: Foreplay Loving Lesbians is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Girls Kissing Girls 2: Foreplay Loving Lesbians until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Cavarrone (talk) 21:06, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Girls Kissing Girls Vol 6.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Girls Kissing Girls Vol 6.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 10:05, 13 December 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Girls Kissing Girls for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Girls Kissing Girls is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Girls Kissing Girls until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Fut.Perf. ☼ 12:16, 14 December 2011 (UTC)