User talk:Erpert/Archives/2015/March

Kelly Shibari

 * Thanks for the email. I noticed that the msbehaved.com link doesn't actually state her exact date of birth (I've only seen it listed on other wikis), so I'm leaving it out. But the other sources give me a lot to work with.  Erpert  blah, blah, blah... 18:45, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
 * D'oh! Just saw the other sources. Thanks again.  Erpert  blah, blah, blah... 19:03, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

{{Proposed deletion/dated
The words: suggests, seems like etc. were inadvertently used in the article. The article is fully referenced and the necessary editing has been done. Will be really happy to do further editing as deemed appropriate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ahmed99999 (talk • contribs) 01:35, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

March 2015
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is User:KTMUSIC1 and article Kimberly Thompson. Thank you. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  14:16, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
 * I think the ANI thread can probably be closed now. I believe you created the article and wrote it to a good standard in absolute good faith, and there's no way you could have predicted this drama. However, just because all information on Wikipedia must be cited to a reliable source, it doesn't follow that all information cited to a reliable source must be in Wikipedia! Normally, I wouldn't have touched the article, but having met people who have add articles on Wikipedia without any involvement at their end, the behaviour of someone who is only on Wikipedia under duress (as the article's subject appears) can be unpredictable. They seemed to have calmed down a bit with the announcement of the AfD, and OTRS is now involved, so hopefully things will sort themselves out. We can always get back to your version in the long term. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  19:33, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes, I did create the article in good faith, but considering that I am the creator, it wouldn't be proper for me to close the thread, imo.  Erpert  blah, blah, blah... 19:36, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

Third Opinion
I just wanted to say thanks for ensuring that my first request at WP:3O will also be my last. Did you actually read the argument at Talk:WWE Hall of Fame? It's between two users, another one just chips in a thought here and there. Did you simply stop when you saw there were three users? I've seen 3O requests filled in arguments that involved more than two people. If you didn't want to do it, you should have left the request. -- Scorpion 0422  19:44, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Out of curiosity, why would you possibly haunt places like WP:3O when you clearly know nothing about dispute resolution (Unofficial Wikipedia Rule #2112: When someone is angry about something you did, archiving and refusing to respond merely pours gasoline on the situation). I waited a long time hoping someone could help out and instead I get this. I'd like a response as to why you dismissed my request. -- Scorpion 0422  02:36, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
 * "Unofficial Wikipedia rule"? And why in the world would you expand a thread that I collapsed on my own talk page? Go away, please.  Erpert  blah, blah, blah... 02:42, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Hey, if you realize you were wrong and can't defend your actions, you can just admit it. You don't have to be rude. In which case, I'd like you to please restore my request at 3O and remove your statement from the talk page. So I can get a third opinion. -- Scorpion 0422  02:47, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
 * I counted at least four editors giving actual opinions in the discussion. And telling you to go away was not a suggestion, so I am also leaving a message on your own talk page because you aren't seeming to get the message.  Erpert  blah, blah, blah... 02:55, 12 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Now you see, that's no fair. You keep giving these contentious statements that clearly require a response, then you tell me that if I respond you'll have me blocked. Fine, I've had my fun. If you want to waste your time getting a largely inactive user blocked be my guest. -- Scorpion 0422  03:04, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

3O re Talk:Matthew VanDyke

 * Hello Erpert - apologies if I've missed something, but I do not think my 3O request has been addressed? You deleted the request from the 3O page but nobody has given a 3O as far as I can see. Grateful for your comments. - Slugfilm (talk) 05:34, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
 * It was addressed right here. Given that, I think WP:BLPN would be a better venue for this issue (I personally have no opinion on it).  Erpert  blah, blah, blah... 07:39, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Thank you for explaining Erpert. I hadn't realised a Third Opinion didn't actually need to be labelled as such.  I will pursue the discussion on WP:BLPN as you suggest. - Slugfilm (talk) 07:58, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

3O re Talk:Scott_Walker_%28politician%29
Thank you Erpert for getting involved. Have another question for you (at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Scott_Walker_%28politician%29#Third_opinion ), namely, should this sentence ...

(On March 9, 2015, Walker signed legislation making Wisconsin a right to work state.[69])

... be added at the end of the paragraph so casual users know how the incident was resolved. --BoogaLouie (talk) 14:58, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

Undiscussed moves

 * Please stop moving (pornographic actress) to (actress) without discussion, the stable title should be held, if you wish to use a RM then use a RM, thanks. In ictu oculi (talk) 17:31, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
 * They were discussed, as I clearly explained here.  Erpert  blah, blah, blah... 19:12, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
 * For that matter, why are moving them back before discussion can start? WP:CONCISE and WP:QUALIFIER seem fairly explanatory. Neither of them provide for your interpretation that the parenthesis must include the word "pornographic" along with "actress" as you have been doing. The latter actually specifies "to limit the tag to a single, recognizable and highly applicable term". --Scalhotrod (Talk) ☮ღ☺ 02:23, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the support,, but let's continue this at the discussion that I linked to above.  Erpert  blah, blah, blah... 02:27, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Hey, I voted early on. I just happened to run across the variety of moves this User has done which lead me here. --Scalhotrod (Talk) ☮ღ☺ 02:54, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Because of guidelines about article stability and project local consensus. In ictu oculi (talk) 07:19, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
 * As I have clearly stated several times, this "local consensus" that you speak of is not going in your favor. I'm closing this so the discussion can be finished at the above talk page like I requested.  Erpert  blah, blah, blah... 07:51, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Alex kyza


The article Alex kyza has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Lakun.patra (talk) 08:11, 30 March 2015 (UTC)


 * I simply moved the article; I didn't create it (the history got jacked up somehow; I'll ask at WP:AN for someone to fix it). JohannaLopez012 created it.  Erpert  blah, blah, blah... 08:45, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

Fair Stone Draft: Your third opinion
Hello Erpert,

thanks for your opinion! Could you give me some pointers as to what sections or which phrase and wordings sound like marketing blah blah? I know the standard and the association behind it and would like to make the article as neutral and objective as possible. I removed the whole adulation phase about WiN=WiN and other minor details.

Greetings from Germany! FairStoneLabel (talk) 08:07, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Before you do anything else, I suggest you file a change of username request at WP:RENAME, because your username right now sounds like you are editing for your company, which violates the username policy.  Erpert  blah, blah, blah... 09:56, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

——————————————————————————————————— ———————————————————————————————————
 * Thanks, just requested a name change.FairStoneLabel (talk) 12:16, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Done :) Would you mind having another look just in case I missed any biased phrases? Either way, thanks for you advices. Will resubmit the article till friday. Azradon (talk) 07:24, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
 * I have responded on the draft's talk page. Have a good day.  Erpert  blah, blah, blah... 00:36, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

——————— Azradon (talk) 08:11, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks, replied on the talk page for the article. Good day to you too :)