User talk:Erreiptesc

Speedy deletion nomination of Brame & Lorenceau Gallery
Hello Erreiptesc,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Brame & Lorenceau Gallery for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 13:48, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Brame & Lorenceau Gallery


The article Brame & Lorenceau Gallery has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * Fails WP:BASIC. Even the French Wikipedia page is tagged.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. John Jaffar Janardan (talk) 11:10, 21 August 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Brame & Lorenceau Gallery for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Brame & Lorenceau Gallery is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Brame & Lorenceau Gallery until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 12:09, 21 August 2016 (UTC)