User talk:Errejay

Welcome!
Hello, Errejay, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or. Again, welcome. Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 18:33, 25 July 2019 (UTC)

Petra Conti
Hello Errejay. I've been reverting your edits to Petra Conti because they have been introducing material into the article which does not conform to a Neutral point of view, as well as a lot of text which is unsourced. Please note that articles on living persons are held to a high standard on Wikipedia, details of which can be found here: WP:BLP. You've reverted my removals of your content twice and reverted the removals of your content by another editor three times, which is a violation of Wikipedia's three revert rule. Please discuss your changes next time before repetitively reverting the actions of other users. -Indy beetle (talk) 03:21, 26 July 2019 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 17:17, 26 July 2019 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 17:01, 3 August 2019 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 19:42, 4 August 2019 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 14:53, 11 August 2019 (UTC)

August 2019
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Bbb23 (talk) 22:02, 11 August 2019 (UTC)
 * I forgot to put the article in the block notice: Petra Conti. As stated in the block log itself, the disruptive edits include copyright infringement, close paraphrasing, and repeatedly (slow edit war) adding the same promotional material.--Bbb23 (talk) 22:03, 11 August 2019 (UTC)