User talk:Erroramong

A belated welcome!


Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Erroramong! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:


 * Introductory tutorial
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The Teahouse

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome!   20:08, 7 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Ah yes thank you. Erroramong (talk) 05:39, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Forwarding message that came to me incorrectly:

Hello, Kaihsu. Thank you for your work on Romantic literature. Triptothecottage, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Triptothecottage (talk) 02:09, 19 April 2024 (UTC) via Kaihsu (talk) 15:27, 19 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Thanks for passing that on, @Kaihsu! Triptothecottage (talk) 22:57, 19 April 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Romantic art forms


A tag has been placed on Category:Romantic art forms indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 06:57, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Scholarship of romanticism


A tag has been placed on Category:Scholarship of romanticism indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 17:10, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

Splitting
Hello Erroramong! I have come across another of your Romanticism-related articles in the New Page Patrol queue - you are doing great work on this, so thank you. Can I ask that you follow the instructions at WP:CORRECTSPLIT when you are doing this to ensure that there is proper attribution of the content of the articles? I will keep an eye out and will patrol the article when this is done, if someone else has not already got to it. Triptothecottage (talk) 03:05, 3 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Hi yes thank you for link to WP:CORRECTSPLIT I was unfamiliar. I saw issues with "§ References" but wanted finish all splits and get Romanticism structured before cleanup, which I spent all day and accomplished but then got WP:MASSR no WP:REVEXP back to the beginning. So now there's all these content forks. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
 * Erroramong (talk) 09:50, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

Category:Patrons of Romantic artists has been nominated for merging
Category:Patrons of Romantic artists has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 12:20, 2 July 2024 (UTC)