User talk:Ertugrul Qadeer

September 2021
Hello, I'm Uness232. I noticed that you recently removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page.  The sexuality of Mehmed II is a controversial topic (rightfully so) but removing sourced information is not the way. Uness232 (talk) 10:43, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Mehmed the Conqueror, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. ''Removal of cited content requires consensus that the citation is unreliable or WP:FRINGE. Side note, the 15th century Ottoman Empire was Persianate, and therefore had a relatively open view of homosexuality. Furthermore, Mehmed II is, notably, a sultan who had bent societal rules on multiple occasions (see certain accursed ones of no significance), so even if the conservative Ulema did take a harsher stance on homosexuality than what was typical for ordinary Muslims, Mehmed II could still have had a open passion of Radu.'' Uness232 (talk) 13:21, 20 September 2021 (UTC)