User talk:Erumpfsnavely/sandbox

I assigned myself to the prison sexuality page. I was at first thinking about adding a new section for LGBT relationships. I think the page would be better laid out if there was a section on female prisoners, male prisoners and then LGBT relations within prison. Moving the LGBT content to the new heading and discussing more personal issues such as libido, psychological and physical health issues for prolonged periods of no sex, masturbation, sexual assault statistics etc. And then have LGBT sexual acts, relationships and expanding the idea of sexuality as a whole under LGBT. If that doesn't work I would like to update rape activity statistics because the current article has number from 1999. Also maybe talking about the connection between sex and power within the prison political structure. Still thinking through some ideas. Erumpfsnavely (talk) 07:00, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

Ok so the original text is in lowercase and anything in caps is suggestions or revisions I made/want to make. I am sorry for the confusion! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Erumpfsnavely (talk • contribs) 21:32, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

Original Text W/ SOME CHANGES
Prison sexuality (or prison sex or penitentiary sex) deals with sexual relationships between confined individuals or those between a prisoner and a prison employee (or other persons to whom prisoners have access). Since most prisons are separated by gender, most sexual activity is conducted with a same-sex partner.[1] Exceptions to this are sex with an employee of the opposite sex, as well as conjugal visits.

Prison sexuality is a topic in the criminal justice system that is unclear and misunderstood due to it being a taboo subject and one that hasn't been researched extensively.[2] There are rules in place to prevent sex in prison, but it still remains a very sexualized environment. Consensual sexual activity is most common in prisons.[3] SUGGESTED REVISION:: (Prison sexuality is an issue that has been commonly misunderstood and misrepresented due to the taboo nature of the subject. Despite having regulations of sexual activity while incarcerated, prison remains a very sexualized environment.)

Prisoner-prisoner relationships Female prisoners The first research done on prison sexuality was on women in 1913. In 1931, researcher Selling, found that different levels of relationships exist between females in prison (and female juvenile facilities), such as "friendship, pseudofamily membership, pseudohomosexuality, and overt homosexuality".[4] The forming of pseudofamilies HAVE BEEN MORE COMMONLY FOUND in women prisons. These are families women create in prison that provide them support, bonds and relationships, like a real family would. Typically, only the main couple in the family has sexual relations. The women take on masculine and feminine roles to mimic a real family. "Mammy" or "mumsy" is given to the older, maternal woman in the family. While "Popsy" is given to the dominant woman, who is least feminine. These "parents" are typically older and are seen as mentors to younger inmates. Roles within pseudofamilies are flexible and do change with time.[4]

In 1965, Ward and Kassebaum conducted research in Frontera through questionnaires and concluded from staff and inmates that "between 30% and 75% of the inmates had sexual affairs while in prison", 50% of those engaging in same-sex sexual activity. Sexual intercourse between these women were typically for fun and enjoyment, sometimes transitioning into a serious relationship. Furthermore, these relationships occurred between women who were housed together or between women of different races; same-race relations are not as typical. After a survey taken in a study conducted by Propper in 1976, his results for reasons for homosexual relationships include "game playing, economic manipulation, loneliness, the need for companionship, and genuine affection".[4] MORE RECENTLY, Researcher, Otis studied what was seen as "unnatural relationships" between interracial women.[4] In 2014, consensual sexual relationships between women in UK prisons were described as "commonplace" by The Daily Telegraph.[5][6]

In homosexual relationships, sexual types for women include: "butch" or daddy" refers to the masculine female who is dominant. The "femme" or "mommy" is the submissive one. A "trick" is a girl who allows herself to be used by others. A "commissary hustler" is manipulative. "Cherries" have never had lesbian experiences and a "square" will not take part in homosexual acts.[7] POSSIBLE LGBT SECTION

Sexual behaviors in prisons are grouped into five categories. The first one is suppression; with suppression inmates choose celibacy. (This type is focused on abstinence while serving time, whether as a personal choice or for staying loyal to one's partner outside of prison.) The second type is Autoeroticism which is taking part in masturbation and pleasuring oneself. (This act is looked down upon in prison and is viewed as self-abuse. IS IT? Safer option) Third is homosexuality consist of two types, consensual true and consensual situation. Consensual true refers to those who were homosexual before prison and situation are those who have homosexual experiences for the first time in prison. The fourth and final is sexual violence. This includes manipulation, coercion and compliance. Manipulation is done for power or some kind of reward. Compliance is done for safety, protection or out of fear.[7] POTENTIALLY REWORKED INTO INTRODUCTION, APPLIES TO BOTH MEN AND WOMEN

Male prisoners Prison sexuality for males has been studied since the 1930s. Research is lacking on consensual sex because most research done has focused on coercion.[3] Sexual abuse is more common among male inmates. Although, the fear of sexual abuse is higher than the amount it actually happens. Men sexually abuse others TO ESTABLISH dominance, power and to maintain their masculinity.[4] Men who are PHYSICALLY weaker will OFFER consenUAL SEX IN EXCHANGE for protection, security, goods or support.[3]

HETEROSEXUAL men in prison, view their homosexual acts as being "situation specific" and do not consider themselves bisexual. These men describe how they imagine being with a woman while taking part in sexual activity with a male inmate. During masturbation, they picture past sexual experiences with women.[8] They take part in homosexual activity due to having no “heterosexual outlets”.[4] REWORK POSSIBLE LGBT SECTION

A dominant sexual partner in prison is called "daddy". Their mate is called "kid" or “girl” and is the submissive one. The dominant partner has their mate take on the feminine role in order to feel more masculine and powerful.[9] LGBT SECTION

Prisoner and other relationships Around the world many prisons offer conjugal visits to the partners of inmates, in which prisoners are permitted to spend time in private rooms with their partners in a prison-facilitated environment. Conjugal visits are restricted to only inmates with good behaviour, and in some jurisdictions this is only permitted for married couples, while others allow domestic partners.[10][11]

Relationships also occur between correctional staff and prisoners.[12] Prisoners and staff spend a great deal of time together, and much of the time the staff would be the only venue for sex with the opposite sex. This applies to security staff, teachers and counselors, medical workers, contractors and religious workers. REWORD

A government report in the UK in 2014 found that female prisoners in England and Wales have been coerced into sex with staff in exchange for alcohol and cigarettes.[13]

Potential for rape activity According to a 2001 Human Rights Watch report "No Escape: Male Rape in U.S. Prisons", sexual slavery is frequently posed as a consensual sexual relationship inside prisons. Rape victims are often intimidated into feigning consent to sexual activity, to the point of becoming "slaves" and the figurative property of their rapists. HRW also stated that many studies report the prevalence of rape perpetrated by black prisoners against caucasian prisoners.[14] TAKE OUT LAST STATEMENT

Prospective slaveholders will sometimes use intimidating innuendo, as opposed to overt threats of violence, which the prospective slave unwillingly accepts, thereby disguising the coercive nature of the sexual activity from even the enslaver.[15] VICTIMS might not even see themselves as being coerced, if the ABUSE is negotiated as repayment for a debt. It is argued that in prison, consent is inherently illusory.

In general, such prisoner-prisoner relationships would by necessity be same sex relationships, as prisons are generally segregated by gender. An exception to this general rule took place in Canada, where two convicted killers of the opposite sex, Karla Homolka and Jean-Paul Gerbet, were able to engage in touching that was sexual in nature through a chain-link fence. The fence was the only barrier separating men and women at Sainte-Anne-des-Plaines prison. The prison is Canada's highest security prison where especially dangerous inmates of either sex may be sent.[18] NOT NEEDED PARAGRAPH

In several surveys conducted by U.S. Department of Justice, Female rapes in prison are significantly higher than that of men. 36.7% of females under the age of 18 were sexually assaulted in some way before admission into the justice system. The number for males under 18 was 14.4%, which is less than half the amount as females. That same number skyrockets when all men and women are considered. 57.2% of all females and 16.1% of all males report to having experienced some form of sexual assault. When considering the relationship between the inmates and the predator, 95.4% of federal woman inmates and 86.3 male inmates report having known the suspect beforehand. The surveys also indicated that women were abused by family members and social acquaintances, whereas men were mainly abused by family members alone.[19] (MORE ACCURATE STATS)

In news media The printed news media in the historical era emphasized the issue of prison rape by establishing a social problem and blaming the U.S. correction system. According to major newspapers, the U.S. correction system not only involved the correctional personnel but the inmates who engaged in homosexuality.[20] Later in the contemporary era, print news media shifted the United States' focus on prison rape from a framed-problem perspective to a political rights and civil rights issue within the U.S. correction system. [20]

The issue of prison rape gained national attention in the press thus creating an open door for new perspectives on how to understand and eliminate the issue. News media contributed to the U.S. government's initiative to intervene in the matter.[20] (NEEDS TO BE COMPLETELY REWORKED BUT GOOD IDEA)

Inmate contraceptive access The amount of STD's in prisons is higher than the general population among both males and females.[3]

As of September 2013, condoms are available inside prisons in Canada, most of the European Union, Australia, Brazil, Indonesia, South Africa, and the US state of Vermont (on 17 September 2013, the Californian Senate approved a bill for condom distribution inside the state's prisons, but the bill was not yet law at the time of approval).[21]

As of September 12, 2016, A bill passed stating that birth control and hygiene products are allowed for female inmates to use if they are prescribed by their physician. All forms of birth control approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) will be made available to all inmates capable of becoming pregnant.[22]

Social constructionist approach Some explanations for prison sexuality include the social constructionist theory by Groth. He implies that sexuality is not only an "inherent part" of a person but also that it may be a "construct of that person's society".[23] Additionally, he mentions that you cannot classify the prisoners sexuality as heterosexual or homosexual during their prison time because it could not be accurate; their sexuality is on hold meanwhile because they act rather on personal needs than interpersonal needs. This, however does not fully conclude that this is the sole reason for prison relationships because they also feel the genuine connection that can turn into a serious relationship.

A similar perspective was penned by Donald Clemmer, who in 1940 theorized that inmates engaged in homosexual behavior partly as they, "were deprived of a heteronormative sexual identity".[24] As sexuality has been historically separated into heterosexual, or homosexual categories, this deprivation model of an inmate satisfying their needs at the cost of changing from heterosexual to homosexual fits with the social constructionist theory.[24]

In 1958, Gresham Sykes created the deprivation model. In this model, heterosexual inmates struggle with deprivation and create a prison subculture. Inmates are deprived of their sexual needs and desire some activity, resort to masturbation, consensual or coerced sex.[2]

John Irwin & Donald Cressey created the importation model in 1962. With this model, inmates create a unique prison culture based on values from the outside. The social constructionist model is made up of social situations and values.[2] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Erumpfsnavely (talk • contribs) 06:04, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

I think this has good information. I am a little confused as to what is the original text and what is revised/drafted. A suggestion I would make would be to add subtitles between all this information so it isn't all jumbled into one category. I think it has very interesting and intriguing information but it is a little hard to follow since it seems to be just one large source of information. Tessakirk (talk) 19:08, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

I agree with the fact that this was kind of hard to make out. I'm not exactly sure what is being added or removed, and what is from the original article. I think that your idea of creating a separate category for the LGBT side of the issue is very smart seeing how the structure of the article is a little weird. I think separating the article up would make it easier to follow so it isn't just like a giant essay full of dense information. Aslider (talk) 06:41, 26 February 2017 (UTC)