User talk:Erutuon/2018

Nomination of Ancient Greek grammar (tables with transliteration)/Adjectives for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ancient Greek grammar (tables with transliteration)/Adjectives is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Ancient Greek grammar (tables with transliteration)/Adjectives until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Professorjohnas (talk) 13:52, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

Remember me?
Hello Erutuon, I hope you are well. Do you remember months back we made edits on Module:User:Awesomemeeos/turkish? Well, I decided to go back there again and so I got a request for you. The  is a separate function from , which should be the primary function of the module.

Is it possible to integrate  into the   function, and that it would be activated by a separate parameter, prop, such as ? Also, if no pos is specified, can you write extra code that would automatically put the stress in the last syllable, as a starting point?

Many thanks in advance! — they call me AWESOMEmeeos ... [ˈɔɪ̯]! 11:22, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

Nomination for merging of Module:Table
Module:Table has been nominated for merging with Module:TableTools. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the module's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. &#123;&#123;3x&#124;p&#125;&#125;ery (talk) 16:13, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

Module:Language
Hi Erutuon. As I'm sure you're aware, Wiktionary and Wikipedia use different names for different languages, so sometimes this module and templates using it can't link to the right language section. (e.g., ). Also, Wiktionary doesn't have all the same languages as Wikipedia (e.g., and languages at Module:languages/datax). Is there a way to add data to the module to make sure the links are correct? Thanks, – Julia (talk) 02:12, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes, the module to add data to is Module:Language/data. To get the template to link to the right section, you just need to add a language data table to the "languages" table, indexed by the Wiktionary code, with its name field set to the Wiktionary language name. Hopefully that is enough information. — Eru·tuon 03:10, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks! I added a bunch of data and it seems to have fixed some problems. I'll add more when I come across other differences. – Julia (talk) 13:55, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Hmm, I should have explained that if a code is not used on Wiktionary, it should be in the redirects table, so that the data for the corresponding Wiktionary code doesn't have to be duplicated. (For instance,,  ,  , and   all need to use the entry-name replacements assigned to  .) So I moved some of the codes that you added, using  to figure out what needed to be done. — Eru·tuon 23:03, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Welp. Thanks for telling me. I'll be sure to just add different names in the future. – Julia (talk) 00:17, 27 May 2018 (UTC)
 * (That came across as super passive-aggressive; not my intention at all) One more question: is there a way to redirect depending on which script is used? Thinking of Chinese varieties– if written in Hanzi, redirect to "Chinese", if in Latin, Cyrillic, Xiao'erjing, etc., don't redirect. – Julia (talk) 00:38, 27 May 2018 (UTC)
 * I suppose it could be done, because there is a script detection function in Module:Language/scripts. Basing it on script would work in some number of cases, but I found out that Cantonese words in Han script use Cantonese as the header as well as Chinese, which might complicate things. I don't know how is actually used and whether the issue will actually come up. (I searched   and  .) — Eru·tuon 09:00, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

Mtavruli
Hello there. Your addition of the new Mtavruli Unicode characters to the Georgian scripts page seemed useful. I'm curious, is there a reason you undid yourself? DRMcCreedy (talk) 03:30, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
 * I just wasn't sure how the Mtavruli characters should be arranged in the table and didn't want to spend time working that out. You can restore them if the arrangement looks fine to you. (I wish the table were generated by a module: that would make it easier to modify.) — Eru·tuon 03:42, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
 * I've verified each character is in the correct row and have restore your edits. Thanks. DRMcCreedy (talk) 15:56, 12 June 2018 (UTC)

Error
List of species described in 2016 is generating an error and populating Category:Articles using Template:IPNI with missing parameters. Can you fix it? It would probably take me more time to figure out the solution. Thanks, wbm1058 (talk) 20:07, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Done. It was using positional parameters, which haven't ever been supported. I guess before my recent edit adding the tracking category, it was not working but nobody noticed. — Eru·tuon 20:16, 15 July 2018 (UTC)

Template:EFloras
Hi, can you revisit your changes to EFloras as it appears to be putting "no volume" into a date parameter and causing cite date errors. Thanks. Keith D (talk) 00:53, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Fixed. — Eru·tuon 01:18, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Many thanks for the quick response. Keith D (talk) 08:21, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

Language categories
Hello. When using the lang template as here please can you make sure that the appropriate categories exist and create them if not? Per WP:REDNOT you shouldn't make edits that add red-linked categories to articles. TIA Le Deluge (talk) 13:37, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Sure. I thought maybe there was a bot that would handle it. — Eru·tuon 20:34, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

ICNafp authorities
I noticed that others have fixed your edits, but for information, we don't use dates with 'botanical' (ICNafp) authorities, only 'zoological' ones. Peter coxhead (talk) 17:16, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
 * You mean years after taxonomic authorities in taxoboxes, like ? I don't remember ever adding those. But thanks for the information; I didn't know they were against policy. — Eru·tuon 19:28, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Module:Log globals
Module:Log globals has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the module's entry on the Templates for discussion page. &#123;&#123;3x&#124;p&#125;&#125;ery (talk) 15:33, 30 September 2018 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Show file signature
Template:Show file signature has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. &#123;&#123;3x&#124;p&#125;&#125;ery (talk) 23:49, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Language/Wiktionary code to name
Template:Language/Wiktionary code to name has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. – BrandonXLF   (t@lk)  05:34, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Language/Wiktionary name to code
Template:Language/Wiktionary name to code has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. – BrandonXLF   (t@lk)  05:37, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

Nasal vowels

 * http://ufdcimages.uflib.ufl.edu/UF/E0/02/50/40/00001/lawton_m.pdf

Hello Erutuon. In Parisian French, nasal vowels are really changed, the word "enfant" was pronounced [ɑ̃fɑ̃], but now it's pronounced [ɒ̃fɒ̃]. In Modern Quebec French, it's pronounced [ãfã], [ãfã] is similar to [ɑ̃fɑ̃], but it's not exactly the same vowel. 104.244.64.173 (talk) 21:38, 16 November 2018 (UTC)

Labiodental [ɱ] in Italian
Hello Erutuon. I've seen that you've edited Help:IPA/Italian in the past, so I thought you could help me to understand a thing. Note 5 says: "the n in /nɡ/~/nk/ is a velar [ŋ], and the one in /nf/~/nv/ is the labiodental [ɱ]". I was wondering why in the symbol list does appear ŋ but ɱ doesn't, but I've read in the same note: "but for simplicity, ⟨m⟩ is used here". Why such a distinguo is made here? In Italian a nasal always assimilates to the following consonant, so ŋ can be found just before k and g while ɱ can be found just before f and v. If it's for simplicity, then also ŋ should be transcribed as n (since, unlike in other languages, in Italian this sound can't be found elsewhere). But this makes the transcription less accurate. Then, why doesn't ɱ have its own place in the list? It's weird to me such a different treatment... Could you enlighten me about this issue, please? Viviocon (talk) 09:18, 19 December 2018 (UTC)