User talk:Eruvian

I wish all first pages looked like this. It's complete, concise, referenced, formatted and even categorized. Fantastic job, more than I can express. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 08:58, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

Quality Score

 * I've moved the page as you requested. It's quite easy just click on the 'move' tab at the top of the article, welcome to Wiki and happy editing. Paste Let’s have a chat. 09:19, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

February 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Quality Score has been reverted.

Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): \byoutube\.com (links: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ssegwi1w1l8, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b8f1zr2uexo). If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file. Video links are also strongly deprecated by our guidelines for external links, partly because they're useless to people with slow internet connections.

If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 18:24, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

Good question
It isn't really a speedy deletion candidate, so the best way to look to get it deleted is to post it on the "Articles for Deletion" page which you can find at WP:AFD. It's a pretty well-established article, but if it's redundant, we can get a community consensus and likely get it deleted. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 23:15, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

Why, thank you! Always glad to help. Please feel free to ask for it anytime you'd like. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 00:39, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

Another godd question. SanDisk is a notable company, but I don't know enough about the products in question to determine how important they are. The articles themselves are neutral and they do have some third-party references. Should be OK to stay IMO. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 23:16, 2 March 2009 (UTC)