User talk:Erykah gandy/sandbox

Great evaluation. This may be something you consider working on for your contribution. BootsGordon (talk) 14:22, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

Audra DeLaney Peer Review
Erykah, I think it is awesome that you have picked this article to update. From doing a hardy academic skim of the article, I can see that it is something that is important to the executive branch and that the public needs to be able to find accurate information on it. I think your next step should be to talk to Vera Lux about the type of research you need to find. She is such an awesome research librarian and will help you do a thorough search. I think once you find links/articles that give you the information you need, you will see a gap or two where you will be able to put in your own research information. Even if you do not find a gap, I bet some of the information in this article at this point is not as factual as it could be and updating it is crucial to making sure people talking about it have accurate information to build their thoughts and statements. Audradelaney (talk) 20:26, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

Kamillia Forbes Peer Edit
I really like how to decide to check the links of the resources that were listed at the bottom of the article that you chose. I think that Oval Office Addresses is a good topic and its pretty interesting. It's definitely a page that needs to be kept up because its very important. I think that its also a great idea for you to talk to the librarian so you can figure out how he/she could help you get more information. I think that maybe in addition to updating the sources, you could maybe add a small amount of information of who works there. Or you could just add links at the bottom. Overall good job with you update and good luck on your page.Kamillia Forbes (talk) 19:33, 6 October 2018 (UTC)

Caitlin Vartorella Peer Review
Erykah, When we did the little in class assignment where we had to explain to each other what we were working on I remembered you saying this was your topic, and I was unsure of what it actually was, so I thought I would come check out your article! I think you did such a great job on this update. You did a lot of the dirty work that not many people are willing to do by going through and updating all of the important links on the page, which is so important to a wikipedia page and it's accuracy. I think this is a really interesting topic as I didn't really know too much about it before reading the article and your contributions. You definitely gave the page the hearty update it needed. I have seen a few other people comment that you should maybe talk to a BGSU librarian about where you can fill in the gaps with more accurate information and I agree that that definitely couldn't hurt!

Cavarto (talk) 20:49, 6 October 2018 (UTC)Caitlin Vartorella