User talk:EsamOmeish

January 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Esam Omeish has been reverted. Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://dromeish.wordpress.com/ (matching the regex rule \bwordpress\.com). If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 14:06, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Esam Omeish, you will be blocked from editing. ''For the reason discussed often and in great detail in edit summaries, at the article talk page, and in the 5 warnings (which were accompanied by 1 block) on the talk page of the IP who also described himself as being Esam Omeish (as you do) while making many deletions, this is not slander (or libel).

You continue to state that it is, and to delete material properly sourced to RSs such as the Washington Post with nothing more than your bare assertion. Since it is not slander, that is not appropriate. You appear to be operating under the belief that anything said about Omeish that is not wholly positive constitutes "slander". That's not the case. These are all proper, as they reflect what reliable sources say about Omeish. Please stop edit-warring and removing appropriate content without a legitimate basis. Many thanks'' Epeefleche (talk) 03:34, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you delete or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to Esam Omeish‎, you will be blocked from editing.

''Per prior comments left on your talk page. Note, as well, that Omeish was a candidate for public office. His salary, which he reported as part of the candidacy process, and which was made public record, is not personal information. Also, the continued deletion by you of sourced text from references such as the Chicago Tribune and the United Nations is not appropriate. Similarly inappropriate is the continued deletion by you of what other candidates for office and newspaper columnists said with regard to your candidacy.'' Epeefleche (talk) 04:24, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. --SineBot (talk) 04:30, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest this block by adding the text below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

I am debating and trying to remove libelous material from my biography that is shown to the internet all over the world. If I can not be allowed to edit my page then I demand full removal of the wiki page in its entirety EsamOmeish (talk) 04:57, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
 * I don't believe there has been any debate. You have been assertions that appear baseless.  The material is properly sourced (in fact, to materials that are also on the internet).  The material ise also about a public figure, who has served on a government committee, and been a candidate for political office.  There has been no showing that the material is libel. And yet you -- in the form of this identity and an IP identity, have deleted them many times, despite many warnings.--Epeefleche (talk) 05:27, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

I will be requesting the full removal of the article since it appears that it is not possible for positive information that refutes false allegations can be posted. I did not "personally hire" Al-Awlaki and neither is my brother a terrorist - amongst other false allegations - yet this person Epeefleche insists on posting this false informationEsamOmeish (talk) 05:41, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

Why is it that when positive and sourced information was added, that it was removed? It is better for the admin to remove this article in its entirety than to allow such allegations to flow from Paul Sperry and his minions EsamOmeish (talk) 05:46, 28 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Feel free to post here any positive information that is relevant which comes from reliable sources for consideration as to inclusion in the article, as was previously suggested on the article talk page. I'm not aware of it.  You were reported by the Washington Post as having been one of the mosque officials who hired Anwar al-Awlaki (and Paul Sperry wrote you "personally" hired him); you are also quoted in the Washington Post as having said in 2004 that you were convinced that al-Awlaki: "has no inclination or active involvement in any events or circumstances that have to do with terrorism."  Those are properly sourced.  Are you saying that the article does not accurately reflect the sources?  The same question as to the reference to your brother.  Or alternatively are you saying that the article does accurately reflect the sources, but you find the information is negative, or that the sources are incorrect?  Also, are you the same person as the IP that says it is Esam Omeish?  And if so, have you made all edits under that IP address?  Thanks.--Epeefleche (talk) 05:55, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

I am telling you that what Paul Sperry is posting on my wiki page is FALSE information regardless of whether it is in the Washington Post or not. I can post that a certain thing happened in the newspaper while leaving out the other side of the story which is what you have continuously done. I have tried on numerous occasions to add positive information about my being a first responder to 9/11 and my awards as well as remove the libel that my brother is a "terrorist" yet these attempts failed because Sperry's people continue to remove it. Why for example should a wiki page on George Bush be exclusively edited by far left Democrats? There is no neutral tone in the article either saying that I am "insideous", calling my brother a "terrorist" and such things. As for the IP address, then the posts that says that I am Esam Omeish are indeed me. The other earlier posts not related to my wiki page were not made by me. EsamOmeish (talk) 13:39, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
 * If material is reported in sources such as the Washington Post, it is proper to reflect it in the article, and it is improper for you to delete it. As I said above, feel free to post here any positive information that is relevant which comes from reliable sources for consideration as to inclusion in the article, as was previously suggested on the article talk page.  Lastly, have you also been editing under the username "Abuzzzubair"?--Epeefleche (talk) 14:03, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

I am NOT editing under the username "Abuzzzubair" but it could be someone that knows me. I see that "Abuzzzubair" attempted to add in positive and sourced information and Paul Sperry's people have removed it proving that there is an agenda here by them. Why does it matter that Paul Sperry says that I "personally hired Awlaki" and I am not allowed to post anything refuting that information? I deny that that is the case and am not allowed to say so? This process is unfair and I am in the process of contacting the wiki foundation EsamOmeish (talk) 14:47, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The reliable sources (including the Washington Post) say you hired al-Awlaki, and the Washington Post also quotes you as to your views on al-Awlaki. If reliable sources said the opposite, we would reflect those statements as well.  But we look to what is said in reliable sources, and limit ourselves to that information.  As to Abuzzzubair, he did not attempt to add anything positive and sourced, as you maintain -- all he did was revert sysop Fastily's edit, deleting a number of paragraphs from the article, much as you have done repeatedly.  By the way, I'll reiterate again that you should feel free to post here any positive information that is relevant which comes from reliable sources for consideration as to inclusion in the article.--Epeefleche (talk) 16:08, 28 January 2010 (UTC)