User talk:Esco83

April 2014
Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Reverse osmosis, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you.  Velella  Velella Talk 12:55, 13 April 2014 (UTC) Thank you for the comment, but I have read thoroughly all data from WHO and other institutions and they all state that RO water is not to be used on everyday basis!


 * But the source does not say "....at desalinated water is extremely dangerous for human health".  Velella  Velella Talk 13:43, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Reverse osmosis shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.  Velella  Velella Talk 13:45, 13 April 2014 (UTC) This is ridiculous, I have not reverted anything, but took time to add some useful info on a subject that is important for humanity. My comments were reverted numerous times, by people that obviously don't know the matter or have other intentions. I have sources, I have information, I have expertise as I sell Reverse Osmosis systems myself. I have everything! Just because there are people here that decided it will be easier to sell RO systems if it says in Wikipedia that people all over the world use them? Why isn't there a single scientist, doctor or toxicologist that goes out with her name and states desalinated, de-mineralised, reverse osmosis water is healthy or and adequate source of hydration? Because this is fiction, on the whole wide page I didn't notice where it says: RISKS from drinking RO water! This is not humane. You guys should read all the available data, travel around the world, drink desalinated water for a couple of months and then we can discuss the matter again.

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you.  Velella  Velella Talk 14:24, 13 April 2014 (UTC)


 * You may also want to look at at the relevant section of the article where there is a balanced discussion about the de-merits of RO water for drinking with three references to WHO publications. The ground is already covered and not in a sensationalist "this is dangerous!" way.  Velella  Velella Talk  15:14, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

I have corrected the part where I said it was dangerous although acidic water and substances are dangerous to the human organism. I believe it is absolutely not covered the best way possible and I believe this is done intentionally by people who trade with such RO systems! Instead of deleting my comments editors could help with editing the text and information the right way so that the end product would provide sufficient information to the reader! There can't be a balanced discussion regarding reverse osmosis water for drinking use, it is simply not good for your body, nor plants, nor soils!!!


 * Please provide references for your final assertion. I would also suggest removing all your addition from the article and posting it to the talk page instead where it can be discussed with other contributors to arrive at consensus as per WP:BRD.  Velella  Velella Talk  15:32, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

I am sorry to say this, but it seems that you are completely biased, you have not read my sources and I am not prepared to waste time on arguing with people that do not have the proper information nor expertise. My sources are clearly stated, please take a look and you will find all the information you are looking for. Strange enough for me I see no evidence or sources stating that this type of water might be suitable for everyday use. I remind you that this water is acidic and the only thing it has to do with human health is renal dialysis! Here are my sources, please show me your sources: http://www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/dwq/nutrientsindw.pdf and http://www.arava.co.il/haklaut/mop/d081007/d081007_2.pdf.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as you did at Reverse osmosis. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Bbb23 (talk) 16:00, 13 April 2014 (UTC)